PSY2002 SEMESTER 2 - WEEK 6 Flashcards

(33 cards)

1
Q

define cognitive psychology

A

study of human mental processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

name tools/measures of cognitive psychology

A

tools- tasks that employ specific cognitive processes
measures- accuracy, RT, eye-movements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

define neuroscience

A

study of brain and nervous system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

name tools/measures of neuroscience

A

tools- brain imaging tools (EEG, fMRI)
measures- EEG signal, BOLD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

define cognitive neuroscience

A

study of relation between brain structures/activity and cognitive functions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is N170 response to faces and objects, what does it suggest?

A

larger to face>object, concluding reflect structural encoding of faces prior to identification
ALTERNATIVEexplanation - assoc with low level features of faces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how does MRI work

A

H atom spin, align in scanner magnetic field. send in radio waves, makes them face into new directions

when relax, return to past alignment - emit energy = scanner uses to create images

H atoms in different tissues have different relaxation times, weaker signal = darker area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

give 3 advantages in fMRI

A

spatial res + structural data
non-invasive
tells us which parts of brain are used in tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

give 5 disadvantages of fMRI

A

poor temporal resolution
experience
no metals
BOLD not direct measure
expensive- questionable research practice issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how does culture affect face processing - how fMRI can inform us in cog, explain Adams (2010) reading mind in eyes?

A

Japanese students more correct on Asian eye, white students on white eye = own race effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is posterior superior temporal sulcus sensitive to (found by fMRI)

A

lip reading, mouth movement, body movement, eye gaze, hand action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what does posterior superior temporal sulcus activities reflect

A

sensitive to implied motion, to stimuli signalling actions of others
so, reflects high-level reasoning, action interpretation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what can posterior superior temporal sulcus activity response to others body language be used in

A

researching own-race effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is found regarding own race effects on posterior superior temporal sulcus

A

both side of brain shows more activation on same race
correlate with behavioural findings, and with fMRI finding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why should we only focus with a single area when studying own race effect via fMRI etc

A

sensitive to “alpha inflation”, due to multiple comparison, therefore if compared many areas then eventually show statistical difference due to type-1 error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how can we avoid alpha inflation (eventual statistical differences generated through multiple area comparisons)

A

compare to unrelated task, eg “gender discriminations” task, see if results are just showing brain carrying out discriminations instead of what actually want to know

17
Q

how can study if autistic individuals/neurotypical process emot image in same way?

A

ppts pick which emotions blurred (face blurred), what object blurred (feet blurred)
emplicit- direct ask what emotions
implicit- don’t ask but emotions clear in a pic

18
Q

what is found (Kana, 2016) regarding if autistic individuals/neurotypcail process emot image in same ways

A

no behavioural diff, but in explicit both autistic/neurot activate similar areas (posterior superior temporal sulcus, medial PFC)
in implicit, autistics lower activate mPFC, pSTS

19
Q

autistics show lower activation in medial PFC, and posterior superior temporal sulcus in emotion processing, what does this suggest??

A

recruit task-specific brain region for processing emotion when they’ve been asked - apply, ask more explicit instruction
higher activity for neurotypicals suggest more automat emot proc
suggest autistic no inherent difficulty recog emotion, just less likely do it unprompted/during other task

20
Q

define social brain network

A

theres multiple brain areas active when proc social stimuli, undergoing signif development adolescent

21
Q

define 3rd person neuroscience

A

standard when studying social activities in brain

22
Q

give examples of third-person neuroscience

A

passive perception of non interactive stimulus, pre-recorded stimulus that ppts know pre-recorded

23
Q

give examples for second persons neuroscience

A

live social partner transmitted via real-time video link, gaze contingent avatar, pre-recorded stimulus that ppt thinks is real

24
Q

outline simulataneous approach used in hyperscanning dual brain studying

A

2 ppts see others resopnse

25
outline sequential approach used in hyperscanning dual brain studying
first person goes into scanner, do recording, and show to second person alongside stimulus
26
outline study of Anders (2011) using hyperscanning/dual brain study in couples, finding a 'shared network effect'
- womens task: express following emotions one by one (joy, anger, fear…) - mens task: watch partner face, try to feel with her found “shared network effect” = examined whether could predict brain activity of men based on brain activities in partner and some areas were co-activated (resulting in high classification accuracy) - and classification accuracies highest in men view partners video, rather than other videos concluded activity in 1 persons brain can influence activity in another persons brain - info can be successfully transferred and info better transferred inbetween partner
27
what does the shared-network effect show
activity in ones brain can infl activity in others, and info can be successfully transferred inbetween partners!
28
state 3 steps of 'brain as-predictor framework'
1. generate hypothesis of what brain region involv in particular cog process of interest 2. collect data in which neural activation in hypothesised regions is measured and data on behavioural outcome recorded 3. test whether activity in brain regions specified predict behaviour outcomes measured in step 2
29
define brain-as-predictor research
treat neural measures as IV in models that predict behaviour outcomes measured in step 2 use both brain map, neural activity as a DV improve ecol validity - connect neural measure directly to outcome
30
apply brain-as-predictor model to cognition
model of intelligence based on structure/functions to explain 45% variance intelligence, predict trajectories of skill acquisition + age related cog decline
31
apply brain-as-predictor model to health
identify regions assoc with persuasion of health beh examine rel between basic social, cog, affective proc
32
apply brain-as-predictor model to economic decisions
predict consumer choices donation behaviour
33
apply brain-as-predictor model in clinical/addictions
predict repsonsiv to therapy for depression, anx, relapsing, how to regulate smoking crav