PSY2002 SEMESTER 2 - WEEK 6 Flashcards
(33 cards)
define cognitive psychology
study of human mental processes
name tools/measures of cognitive psychology
tools- tasks that employ specific cognitive processes
measures- accuracy, RT, eye-movements
define neuroscience
study of brain and nervous system
name tools/measures of neuroscience
tools- brain imaging tools (EEG, fMRI)
measures- EEG signal, BOLD
define cognitive neuroscience
study of relation between brain structures/activity and cognitive functions
what is N170 response to faces and objects, what does it suggest?
larger to face>object, concluding reflect structural encoding of faces prior to identification
ALTERNATIVEexplanation - assoc with low level features of faces
how does MRI work
H atom spin, align in scanner magnetic field. send in radio waves, makes them face into new directions
when relax, return to past alignment - emit energy = scanner uses to create images
H atoms in different tissues have different relaxation times, weaker signal = darker area
give 3 advantages in fMRI
spatial res + structural data
non-invasive
tells us which parts of brain are used in tasks
give 5 disadvantages of fMRI
poor temporal resolution
experience
no metals
BOLD not direct measure
expensive- questionable research practice issues
how does culture affect face processing - how fMRI can inform us in cog, explain Adams (2010) reading mind in eyes?
Japanese students more correct on Asian eye, white students on white eye = own race effect
what is posterior superior temporal sulcus sensitive to (found by fMRI)
lip reading, mouth movement, body movement, eye gaze, hand action
what does posterior superior temporal sulcus activities reflect
sensitive to implied motion, to stimuli signalling actions of others
so, reflects high-level reasoning, action interpretation
what can posterior superior temporal sulcus activity response to others body language be used in
researching own-race effect
what is found regarding own race effects on posterior superior temporal sulcus
both side of brain shows more activation on same race
correlate with behavioural findings, and with fMRI finding
why should we only focus with a single area when studying own race effect via fMRI etc
sensitive to “alpha inflation”, due to multiple comparison, therefore if compared many areas then eventually show statistical difference due to type-1 error
how can we avoid alpha inflation (eventual statistical differences generated through multiple area comparisons)
compare to unrelated task, eg “gender discriminations” task, see if results are just showing brain carrying out discriminations instead of what actually want to know
how can study if autistic individuals/neurotypical process emot image in same way?
ppts pick which emotions blurred (face blurred), what object blurred (feet blurred)
emplicit- direct ask what emotions
implicit- don’t ask but emotions clear in a pic
what is found (Kana, 2016) regarding if autistic individuals/neurotypcail process emot image in same ways
no behavioural diff, but in explicit both autistic/neurot activate similar areas (posterior superior temporal sulcus, medial PFC)
in implicit, autistics lower activate mPFC, pSTS
autistics show lower activation in medial PFC, and posterior superior temporal sulcus in emotion processing, what does this suggest??
recruit task-specific brain region for processing emotion when they’ve been asked - apply, ask more explicit instruction
higher activity for neurotypicals suggest more automat emot proc
suggest autistic no inherent difficulty recog emotion, just less likely do it unprompted/during other task
define social brain network
theres multiple brain areas active when proc social stimuli, undergoing signif development adolescent
define 3rd person neuroscience
standard when studying social activities in brain
give examples of third-person neuroscience
passive perception of non interactive stimulus, pre-recorded stimulus that ppts know pre-recorded
give examples for second persons neuroscience
live social partner transmitted via real-time video link, gaze contingent avatar, pre-recorded stimulus that ppt thinks is real
outline simulataneous approach used in hyperscanning dual brain studying
2 ppts see others resopnse