PSY2002 SEMESTER 2 - WEEK 8 Flashcards

(68 cards)

1
Q

define rationality as optimisation

A

calculate costs and benefits, with rationale decision maximising benefit
norms are important aspects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define using norm to follow when making a rational decisions

A

rules of action/thoughts defining optimality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

name 2 rationality norms

A

coherence, correspondence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define coherence norm (norm of rationality)

A

should be consistent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

define correspondence norm (norm of rationality)

A

correspond to a reality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

define availability bias

A

over-estimating frequency of rare/memorable event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

define framing bias

A

switching your decision based on question framings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what error does availability bias correspond with

A

correspondence error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what error does framing bias correspond with

A

coherence error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

define correspondence error

A

doesn’t reflect reality of actual crashes frequencies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

define coherence error

A

lacking coherence due to changing decision based on framing of questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

outline the Linda problem

A

Linda is a bank teller, or Linda is a bank teller and active in feminist movement

option 2 less likely than 1, as is subset of option 1 - needs 2 things to be true, opt 1 only need 1
most people choose 2, in defiance of norms (law of probability), making conjunction fallacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

whats conjunction fallacy

A

error in reasoning by assuming that specific conditions are more probable than a single, more general condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what does decision calculus include

A

using logical, systematic consideration, probability for all options

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

for rationality, when probability is based on value, whats a good bet

A

expected value is greater than amount invested

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

for rationality, when probability is based on value, whats a bad bet

A

expected value is less than amount invested

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

in rationality, what is rational choice when investing in bet

A
  • to invest to maximise expected value
  • risk aversion= tendency of people to accept a sure outcome over riskier outcome
  • but values not always most important factor in decision making
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

when calculating expected value, what needs to be taken into consideration?

A
  • various possible future situations relevant to our bets
  • value of investment in those situation
  • probabilities that these situations occurs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what is expected value

A

weighted average for values in diff situ, is weighted by probabilities in each situ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

how can expected value be calculated

A

EV= P(O1) x V(O1) + P(O2) x V(O2)…..

EV= probability of it happening x value of investment if it happen

O is future outcomes that could possibly be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

give an example for calculating expected values

A

both of you toss a coin - heads you win both, tails she win both

2 outcomes = O1 heads, O2 tails

probability of each = 1/2

value of investment in each situ = when heads, is £2 and when tails, is £0

EV = P(heads) x V(heads) + P(tails) x V(tails) = 1/2 x £2 + 1/2 x £0 = £1

so EV £1, investing £1 with expectation of £1 back

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

define utility

A

benefit that you are getting (rather than just thinking about its costs)
taking into consideration not just value but significance of outcomes, and degree to which contributing to wellbeings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

define expected utility

A

weighted average of satisfaction from possible outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

compare decision making method and rational decision making in utility

A

calculating option with highest expected utility is decision making method, rational decision making may assume choose option that maximises our utility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
define marginal utility
additional satisfaction gained by unit of goods/services as amount of money has increase, each addition to one fortune become less important from subjectiv POV eg; £1000 to Bill Gates means little, but to me means lots
26
explain how value isnt utility
utility is compressed with respect to value = ie dont enjoy 10 pizza 10x more than 1, even though it cost 10x more than just 1 - utility is how much you enjoy/prefer it, degree to which it contributes to your overall wellbeing/satisfies your desires
27
according to expected utility theory, how should we behave when flips coins
should behave to maximise expected utility ie, if option a is head to win £1000, but tails £0 or b no coin flip = £499, then choose A
28
whats equation for calculating expected utility?
E=p*U expected utility =probability x utility
29
give example of calculating expected utility for bet, 50% chance of a £40 payoff?
E=0.5 x 40 = £20
30
give equation for calculating expected utility under multiple option
E=p1*U1 + p2*U2.....
31
give an example of calculating expected utility for multiple option?
eg; offered lottery ticket for £15 with 20% chance of paying out £50 and 10% chance of paying out £100 according to expected utility theory, should you buy? expected utility (E) need to exceed cost (0.2 x 50) + (0.1 x 100) = 20 20 is more than £15 = YES
32
define 'effect of uncertainty'
everything has uncertainty but differ in amounts
33
for graph with smooth curve of uncertainty, what does it mean??
things will most likely be okay but they could go very good or bad
34
for graph with small bump, then a big bump, mean with uncertainty
things will probably be good but there's a small chance they might go bad
35
for graph with big bump, then another a big bump, mean with uncertainty
things could be good or bad
36
define loss aversion
if garunteed loss, opt for option where loss may/not happen instead of optimal utility = aversive to garunteed loss if have £100, lose £50, likely feel worse than if had £0 and gained £50 innate motive to prefer avoiding losses rather than achieving similar gains
37
how does loss aversion align with biases in making decision
feel pain of loss more than pleasure of equivalent gain
38
define risk aversion
tendency accept sure thing over risk, despite lower expected values
39
if have $1000, choose to either a. flip, heads win another $1000, tails win nothing b. an additional $500 if have $2000, choose to either a. flip, heads lose $1000, tails lose nothing b. lose $500 what would utility theory suggests do
choose b for both= coin flip between £1000 and £2000 and b is £1500 for certain
40
define prospect theory
alternative to utility theory, accounting for regularities in humans economic behaviour ie, willing overpaying for a small chance at large gain like for lottery ticket, willingness to pay premium to eliminate small risk (insurance), willingness to take on risk to avoid large loss, etc
41
outlines why rationality 'bounded'
complex environment so decisions need making quick, time limited, cog capacity also is limited
42
what does ecological rationality perspective suggest regarding why we would use heuristic
rationality are defined by how should behave in environment to survive, not just norms correspondence with environment (how cog work in world) more important than coherence (logic processing) past behaviours may fail when environment rapid changes
43
define adaptive value
value of action, across evolutionary time, with evolution maximising long-term expected value error permissible if average benefit, avoids costly mistake, avoid high cost
44
why are heuristics good?
heuristics give us strategy in uncertain world, make assumptions and allow decision when unable to use systematic strategy don’t attempt to find optimal solution but good enough solution, but can have biases
45
when does a recognition heuristics work
works when have some (not none) knowledge and when likelihood of hearing of option correlate with its value/importance/size
46
when does a recognition heuristics not work
when doesn’t work (knows too much, little, when incidence isn’t related to value) can lead to systematic error
47
why should an good heuristic be frugal
ignores info, don’t trying optomise but satisfice (finding good enough solution) eg; choosing max of function is form of optomising but choosing first option that exceeds aspiration level is satisficing
48
what is computational heuristic model
make precise predictions and can be tested experiment via computer, promoting theoretical progress use tractability and robustness
49
what is tractability (computational heuristic model)
many real world problem computationally intractable - computer cannot find best strategies
50
what is robustness (computational heuristic model)
we use hindsight to analyse our past with relev info from past experiences divided in 2 group (relev for future, + irrelevant noise) if criter more diff predict = more nosie
51
define default heuristic
if there is default do nothing about it = why more French organ donor>Americans
52
how can you study heuristic
- analyse on phylogenetic, ontogenetic and cultural dev level - determine environ structures that heuristics successful at
53
how does reinforcement learning impact how heuristics selected
heuristic is selected based on individual reinforcement learnings, guided by individual reinforcement learning, social learning (being told where to look up info as doctor), evolutionary learning (rules of thumb on predation)
54
what 2 judgements used to check ecolog rationality of heuristic before is applied regular
1. recognition judgement: determine whether heuristic can be used in situ 2. evaluations
55
what 3 laws/theory define bias/error
- expected utility theory - laws of logic - laws of probability (eg, conjunction problem)
56
summarise 2-4-6 tasks (Wason)
find generating rule using to create 3 number sequence, propose test examples and get told whether fits/break rules found most people mostly think highly specific rule, generate examples to fit= use confirmation bias
57
define positive test strategy
seek to verify hypothesis, but then can find it false
58
define negative test strategy
seek to falsify hypothesis, but can find it true
59
outline process of positive test strategy, when rule is general
belief- rule is specific truth- rule is general positive test strategy- always confirms belief, belief never improves
60
outline process of positive test strategy, when rule is specific
belief- rule is specific truth- rule is specific positive test strategy- rapidly converges on truth
61
apply positive and neg test strategy to knocks at door
hear knock at door hypothesis: someones at door - positive test strategy: open door - negative test strategy: eliminate other possible sources of knocking (check window and wardrobe, etc) fir between hypothesis and reality determines which is best
62
define communication interpretation
when info is given, tend to be for reason so use that info to come to answer
63
compare bias/error
- mistake one off, but systematic errors consistent - biases are making wrong choice but for reason
64
name 3 reason for making systematic error
- using strategy optimised for diff environ - considering diff bundle of choice - using different cost/benefit analysis
65
state dual process theory predictions for rational v heuristic thinking
features should go together= no conscious heuristic thinking or rational thinking should switch between modes of thinking in right circumstances (eg, more time = more deliberate thinking)
66
what are dual process theories
psychological theory which posits 2 processes which work at same time, or support same capacity usually work together, can be in conflict with eachother, one usually has system 1-like properties, one system-2 like properties (ie, 1 like heuristics, 1 like a rational)
67
name implications for investigating diff biases
we try understand - their perception of costs & benefits - their experience of similar decisions - their assumptions about environment
68
what 2 systems does dual process theory state we have?
fast system 1 slow system 2