PSY2002 SEMESTER 2 - WEEK 8 Flashcards
(68 cards)
define rationality as optimisation
calculate costs and benefits, with rationale decision maximising benefit
norms are important aspects
define using norm to follow when making a rational decisions
rules of action/thoughts defining optimality
name 2 rationality norms
coherence, correspondence
define coherence norm (norm of rationality)
should be consistent
define correspondence norm (norm of rationality)
correspond to a reality
define availability bias
over-estimating frequency of rare/memorable event
define framing bias
switching your decision based on question framings
what error does availability bias correspond with
correspondence error
what error does framing bias correspond with
coherence error
define correspondence error
doesn’t reflect reality of actual crashes frequencies
define coherence error
lacking coherence due to changing decision based on framing of questions
outline the Linda problem
Linda is a bank teller, or Linda is a bank teller and active in feminist movement
option 2 less likely than 1, as is subset of option 1 - needs 2 things to be true, opt 1 only need 1
most people choose 2, in defiance of norms (law of probability), making conjunction fallacy
whats conjunction fallacy
error in reasoning by assuming that specific conditions are more probable than a single, more general condition
what does decision calculus include
using logical, systematic consideration, probability for all options
for rationality, when probability is based on value, whats a good bet
expected value is greater than amount invested
for rationality, when probability is based on value, whats a bad bet
expected value is less than amount invested
in rationality, what is rational choice when investing in bet
- to invest to maximise expected value
- risk aversion= tendency of people to accept a sure outcome over riskier outcome
- but values not always most important factor in decision making
when calculating expected value, what needs to be taken into consideration?
- various possible future situations relevant to our bets
- value of investment in those situation
- probabilities that these situations occurs
what is expected value
weighted average for values in diff situ, is weighted by probabilities in each situ
how can expected value be calculated
EV= P(O1) x V(O1) + P(O2) x V(O2)…..
EV= probability of it happening x value of investment if it happen
O is future outcomes that could possibly be
give an example for calculating expected values
both of you toss a coin - heads you win both, tails she win both
2 outcomes = O1 heads, O2 tails
probability of each = 1/2
value of investment in each situ = when heads, is £2 and when tails, is £0
EV = P(heads) x V(heads) + P(tails) x V(tails) = 1/2 x £2 + 1/2 x £0 = £1
so EV £1, investing £1 with expectation of £1 back
define utility
benefit that you are getting (rather than just thinking about its costs)
taking into consideration not just value but significance of outcomes, and degree to which contributing to wellbeings
define expected utility
weighted average of satisfaction from possible outcomes
compare decision making method and rational decision making in utility
calculating option with highest expected utility is decision making method, rational decision making may assume choose option that maximises our utility