Psychopathology Flashcards
(161 cards)
what is psychopathology?
the scientific study of mental/psychological disorders.
what is normal behaviour?
following the basic expectations of society.
what is subjectivity in regards to psychopathology?
abnormality is difficult to define because it is subjective - based on opinions and ideas rather than objectivity (free from bias).
what is cultural relativism?
the idea that cultural norms and values are culture specific and no one culture is superior to another, therefore, abnormality has to be defined in the context of the culture the behaviour takes place, otherwise it is culturally biased.
what are the definitions of abnormality?
statistical infrequency/deviation, deviation from social norms, failure to function adequately and deviation from ideal mental health.
what is statistical infrequency/deviation?
when an individual has a less common characteristic e.g. being more depressed or less intelligent than most of the population.
what is an example of statistical infrequency/deviation?
- schizophrenia affects 1% of the population.
- IQ below 70 (bottom 2% of the normal distribution for IQ) is part of the diagnosis for intellectual disability disorder (IDD)
what are the strengths of statistical infrequency/deviation?
- it looks at the whole picture, taking all the population into account so it can give a useful insight into the whole picture of a particular characteristic.
- there are benefits as some ‘unusual’ people can receive extra support from being classed as abnormal e.g. someone with a low IQ or with a high BDI.
- there is real-world application as it has been used in clinical practice; as part of formal diagnosis and as a way to assess the severity of an individual’s symptoms.
- the mathematical nature of this definition means it is clear what is defined as abnormal and what is not, there is no opinion involved which means there is no bias.
-> counterpoint: however, it takes no consideration of cultural differences e.g. in some cultures, hearing voices is normal and even considered beneficial.
what are the weaknesses of statistical infrequency/deviation?
- not all statistically unusual people benefit from labels, someone with a low IQ who can cope with their chosen lifestyle would not benefit from a label - there is a social stigma attached to such labels.
- abnormal behaviour can occur frequently e.g. in 2014, depression occurred in nearly 20% of the UK population.
what is deviation from social norms?
it concerns behaviour that is different from the accepted standards of behaviour in a community or society; different for each generation/culture so there are a few behaviours universally abnormal.
what is an example of deviation from social norms?
antisocial personality disorder (psychopathy) is impulsive, aggressive and irresponsible behaviour which, according to the DSM-5, doesn’t fit into our society’s norms and values meaning they are classified as abnormal.
what are the strengths of deviation from social norms?
- it is flexible dependent on the situation and age e.g. normal to wear full clothing whilst out shopping, but a bikini on the beach.
- adhering to social norms means that society is ordered and predictable, this is argued to be advantageous for society.
- it is used in clinical practice (has value in psychiatry) and it needed to be able to use the definition to diagnose conditions such as antisocial personality disorder.
what are the weaknesses of deviation from social norms?
- norms vary dependent on the time and legislation changes causing a lack of consensus between generations e.g. homosexuality - a mental illness in 1970s but not now.
- different cultures have different ideas about what is and is not normal, it is only being immersed in the culture for a period of time that the decision can be made, therefore this definition can be culturally biased if applying one culture’s standards of normal on another.
- social norms tend to be dictated by the majority within a culture and this means that there are sections of society where behaviour is seen as normal within an ethnic community, but not within the culture as a whole, this can lead to a lack of understanding from both the ethnic minority and the majority of people within a culture.
what is failure to function adequately?
behaviour which causes an inability to cope with everyday life and personal distress or anguish to themselves and/or others.
what did rosenham and seligman (1989) propose?
additional signs that can be used to determine when someone is not coping with everyday life.
what are the signs that rosenham and seligman (1989) proposed?
- when a person no longer conforms to standard interpersonal rules.
- when a person experiences severe personal distress.
- when a person’s behaviour becomes irrational or dangerous to themselves or others.
what is an example of failure to function adequately?
intellectual disability disorder - an individual must be failing to function adequately before given a diagnosis.
what are the strengths of failure to function adequately?
- this definition is focused on the individual and their perspective, so if someone feels as though they are struggling they will be deemed abnormal and get help.
- the global assessment of functioning scale (GAF) is used to measure the exten of the failure to function which means that it is relatively objective.
- failure to function adequately can be seen by others which means that problems can be picked up by others and if the individual is incapable of making a decision or helping themselves others can intervene.
what are the weaknesses of failure to function adequately?
- abnormal behaviours may not be a problem for the individual, but may be for others around them e.g. someone may be abnormally aggressive and not be worried by it, but family and friends are.
- some abnormal behaviour can be missed because people may appear fine to others as they fit into society and have jobs and homes, but they may have distorted thinking which is causing them inner distress that they hide.
- people have different ideas of normal everyday life which varies within and across cultures, culturally it is not unusual to have siestas or move home regularly which may be seen as abnormal, this means that the definition is not clear.
what is deviation from ideal mental health?
behaviour which fails to meet a particular criteria for psychological wellbeing.
what did jahoda (1958) suggest?
a criteria for good mental health.
what was jahoda’s criteria for good mental health?
- no symptoms or distress.
- rational and can perceive themselves accurately.
- self-actualise (strive to reach potential).
- can cope with stress.
- has a realistic view of the world.
- good self-esteem and lack guilt.
- independent of other people.
- can successfully work, love and enjoy leisure.
what are the strengths of deviation from ideal mental health?
- it allows for an individual who is struggling to have targeted intervention if their behaviour is not ‘normal’ e.g. addressing distorted thinking to improve behaviour (paranoia).
- it focuses on what is helpful and desirable for the individual, rather than looking at negatives of behaviour.
- it allows for clear goals to be set and focused on to achieve normality.
what are the weaknesses of deviation from ideal mental health?
- the criteria for ideal mental health is practically impossible to achieve, making the majority of the population, using this definition, abnormal.
- it applies well to most western cultures (individualist) but not non-western cultures (collectivist) that cannot relate to the criteria, the definition is not universal e.g. autonomy - collectivist cultures value dependence, community and seeking the greater good so would appear abnormal using this criteria.
- the criteria is vague and very difficult to measure, making it hard to decide whether someone fulfils it or not.