Cognition and Development Flashcards

1
Q

what is cognitive development?

A

it describes the development of all mental processes, especially thinking, reasoning and understanding of the world, it continues throughout the lifespan.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is piaget’s theory of cognitive development?

A

he realised that children think in different ways from adults and based on this, he proposed discrete stages in the development of a child’s thinking, he viewed cognitive development as a progressive reorganisation of mental processes that occurs as a result of both biological maturation and environmental experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is a schema?

A

a cognitive framework (mental structure) that helps us organise knowledge and understand the world, they are developed from experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

why is the role of a schema important?

A

they are ‘units’ of knowledge, each relating to one aspect of the world, including objects, actions and abstract (theoretical) concepts e.g. love, forgiveness and justice.
- they develop through a child’s experience and interaction with the physical world and as children develop, they are able to construct more detailed and complex schemas of the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how is learning motivated?

A

disequilibrium and equilibration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is disequilibrium?

A

it is what we experience as individuals when we are pushed to learn when our existing schema do not allow us to make sense of something new, an unpleasant state of imbalance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is equilibration?

A

it is used to escape disequilibrium, it is the ongoing process of balancing new information with existing knowledge (schemas) through assimilation and accommodation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how does learning take place?

A

assimilation and accommodation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is assimilation?

A

it involves fitting a new experience into an existing schema.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is accommodation?

A

it involves the modification of an existing schema to understand (accommodate) new information, it may involve creating a new schema altogether.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the strengths of piaget’s theory of cognitive development?

A

piaget’s theory suggests children form their own mental representations of the world, howe et al (1992) found that children came up with their own conclusions and facts about movement down a slope, increasing their understanding which provides support to piaget’s theory and showcasing the role of the schema.

piaget’s theory has been applied in teaching, the old-fashioned classroom has been replaced by activity-oriented classroom in which children actively engage in tasks allowing them to construct their own understandings, such discovery learning can take different forms which shows how piaget-inspired approaches may facilitate the development of individual mental representations of the world.
-> (counterpoint): however, there is no firm evidence showing that children learn better using discovery learning, lazonder and harmsen (2016) claimed that it seems that input from others is the crucial element of the effectiveness of discovery learning rather than just teachers which means that discovery learning is less effective than expected based on piaget’s theory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are the weaknesses of piaget’s theory of cognitive development?

A

piaget focused on what was happening in the minds of individual learners, other theories place more emphasis on the importance of other people in children’s learning e.g. vygotsky proposed that learning is essentially a social process with evidence to support which means that piaget’s theory may be an incomplete explanation for learning because it doesn’t put enough emphasis on the role of other people in learning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what did vygotsky say the stages of intellectual development were?

A

he identified 4 stages - each characterised by a different level of reasoning ability, although the exact age may vary from child to child, all children develop through the same sequence of stages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the 4 stages of intellectual development?

A

sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational and formal operational.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is the sensorimotor stage?

A

(0-2 years)
in this stage children are matching their senses with what they do and are developing basic physical co-ordination, they learn by trial and error and by moving around (exploration).
- one of the operations include object permanance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is object permanance?

A

usually occurs at approximately 8 months and it is being aware that objects still exist when they are out of sight.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is the preoperational stage?

A

(2-7 years)
in this stage children are learning to use symbols (language) to represent objects but lack reasoning ability, operations include: conservation, egocentrism and class inclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what is conservation?

A

quantity remains constant even when appearance of objects change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what is egocentrism?

A

seeing the world only from one’s own point of view.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what is class inclusion?

A

a classification skill in which children begin to be able to classify objects into 2 or more categories simultaneously.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what is the concrete operational stage?

A

(7-11 years)
in this stage children begin to have better reasoning abilities but only with concrete ideas (physical) and they are able to conserve, however they lack abstract reasoning which means they struggle to imagine concepts/situations that they cannot see.
- concrete operations are carried out on physical things whereas formal operations are carried out on ideas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what is the formal operational stage?

A

(11+ years)
in this stage children develop the ability to think about things with they have not actually experiences (hypothetical) and draw conclusions - they can focus on the form of the argument and not get distracted by its content.
- tested with syllogisms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what are syllogisms?

A

a form of reasoning in which a conclusions is drawn from 2 given or assumed propositions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what are the strengths of piaget’s stages of intellecutal development?

A

there is real-world application, knowledge of these stages of development can help guide curriculum designs in schools and can help children through the stages within education suggesting that his theory has practical application.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

what are the weaknesses of piget’s stages ofintellectual development?

A

there are criticisms of piaget’s methods which suggests children can do tasks earlier than piaget suggested, mcgarrigle and donaldson (1974) set up a study in which counters appeared to move by accident, in the ‘naughty teddy’ condition children were able to conserve earlier than originally shown which means that piaget was possibly wrong about the age in which conservation appears, research on egocentrism and class inclusion variations were also conducted and similar contradictions were found.
-> (counterpoint): however, this does not undermine the entire stages theory but questions the age at which each stage occurs.

vygotsky placed more emphasis on social learning than piaget did, he focused on the role of others in learning - observation, group tasks and experts guiding the children, strong evidence to support the idea that learning is enhanced by interactions meaning piaget’s theory could be considered as an incomplete explanation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

what is vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development (1934)?

A

he was influenced by piaget’s work and agreed on many of the basics of cognitive development but the major difference between their theories was that vygotsky saw cognitive development as a social process of learning from more experienced others; role of others in learning.
- saw language and culture as an important part of cognitive development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

how are there cultural differences in cognitive abilities?

A

if reasoning abilities are acquired from the more experienced individuals that the child has contact with, then the child will acquire the reasoning abilities of those people meaning that there may be cultural differences in cognitive development, with children picking up the mental ‘tools’ that will be the most important for life within the physical, social and work environments of their culture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

what did vygotsky identify?

A

he identified a gap between a child’s current level of development (what they can understand and do alone) and what they can potentially understand after interaction with more expert others - which is known as the zone of proximal development (ZPD).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

what did vygotsky say about the ZPD?

A

expert assistance allows a child to cross the ZPD and understand as much of a subject/situation as they are capable of - they are still limited by their developmental stage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

what did vygotsky also believe?

A

that children develop a more advanced understanding of a situation, so the more advanced reasoning abilities are needed to deal with it by learning from others.
- believed that higher mental functions could only be acquired through interaction with more advanced others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

what is scaffolding and who came up with it?

A

the process of helping a learner cross the ZPD and advance as much as they can, given their stage of development - wood, bruner and ross (1976).
- expanded vygotsky’s theory after he passed away.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

what did wood et al note about scaffolding?

A

they noted the particular strategies that experts use when scaffolding.
- as a learner crosses the ZPD, the level of help given in scaffolding declines from level 5 (most help) to level 1 (least help).
- an adult is more likely to use a high level of help strategies when first helping and then gradually withdraw the level of help as a child grasps the tasks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

what are the strengths of vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development?

A

there is research support for the ZPD, roazzi and bryant (1998) had children aged 4-5 years estimate the number of seeets in a box in 2 conditions: working alone and working with help, they found that children gave better estimated when they worked with an older child (help) which supports the role of the ZPD - children can learn more with the help of others.

there is real-world application, his theory has been applied in education and helps raise expectations of what children can do with the help of others - TAs, tutoring etc, children tutored made more progress in reading than those not tutored showing that his theory is useful and has value in real-world settings.
-> (counterpoint): liu and matthews (2005) point out that in china, classes of up to 50 children learn very effectively in lecture-style classroom with very few individual interactions with peers or tutors meaning that vygotsky may have overestimated the importance of scaffolding in learning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

what are the weaknesses of vygotsky’s theory of cognitive development?

A

vygotsky’s theory covers interactional learning but this may not always be the case - children often only learn when they are ready to as much as their brain allows, however, if social learning is the essence of cognitive development then learning would be faster; vygotsky also ignores the biological aspects that aid or restricts cognitive development such as the development of the brain and maturation, therefore piaget’s theory of cognitive development might be a better explanation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

what is baillargeon’s theory of cognitive development?

A

criticised piaget (object permanence) because babies don’t have the motor skills to do so or they are easily distracted.
- other research methods have shown that babies as young as 3 months have object permanence so they have a better understanding of the world.
- also proposed that babies are born with the physical reasoning system and with the ability to learn quickly from new experiences - understanding of the world becomes more sophisticated with each new experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

what is object persistence?

A

an object remains in existence and does not spontaneously alter in structure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

what is knowledge of the physical world?

A

the extent to which we understand how the physical world works e.g. object permanence.

38
Q

what is the physical reasoning system?

A

an innate basic understanding of the physical world which is developed through experience.

39
Q

what is the violation of expectation (VOE) method?

A

a technique developed by baillargeon to investigate what a child understands about the physical world, anything impossible would lead to surprise - this is how their knowledge of the world is tested.

40
Q

what did baillargeon and graver (1987) do in their VOE research?

A

babies’ attention to expected and unexpected events is compared and they showed short and tall rabbits passing a screen.
- in familiarisation event: short and tall rabbit disappear as they pass the screen.
- in test event: expected event = short rabbit not visible at it passes behind screen with window and tall rabbit visible, unexpected event = tall rabbit not visible as it passes behind the screen with window

41
Q

what did baillargeon and graver (1987) find in their VOE research?

A

babies looked longer at the unexpected event (33.07 seconds) compared to the expected event (25.11 seconds) - the tall rabbit did not appear at the window which suggests a good understanding of object permanence.

42
Q

what did other studies test with the VOE method?

A

they tested infant understanding of containment and support.

43
Q

what is containment?

A

when an object is seen to enter a container it should still be there.

44
Q

what is support?

A

an object should fall when unsupported but not when on a surface.

45
Q

what are the strengths of baillargeon’s explanation of infant abilities?

A

the lack of object permanence may be because the infant has been distracted, the VOE method eliminates this confounding variable as the only thing being measured is how long the baby looks at the visual scene meaning it has greater validity than piaget’s theory - confounding variable controlled and support provided for her theory.
-> (counterpoint): acting in accordance with a principle is not the same as understanding it meaning that this may not represent a change in cognitive abilities.

hespos and amrle (2012) found that children all appear to have some understanding of the physical world regardless of culture and personal experience suggesting that a basic understanding of the physical world is innate meaning that baillargeon’s physical reasoning system is correct.

46
Q

what are the weaknesses of baillargeon’s explanation of infant abilities?

A

we cannot directly tell what a baby understands but we have to infer it from their behaviour, it is being assumed that the VOE response is to the unexpectedness but it may just be more interesting for some other reason meaning that the VOE method may not be an entirely valid way to study a very young child’s understanding of the physical world.

47
Q

what is social cognition?

A

it refers to the internal (mental) processes that underlies social interactions e.g. how we think about others and ourselves, how we interact with others etc.
- allows us to understand social behaviours and respond in appropriate ways.

48
Q

what is perspective-taking?

A

the ability to understand a social situation from another person’s point of view.

49
Q

what is social perspective-taking?

A

understanding what someone else is thinking/feeling aka role-taking.

50
Q

what is selman’s theory?

A

he devised a theory to explain how we develop the ability to take a different perspective.

51
Q

what did selman do in his research involving personal dilemmas (1971)?

A
  • looked at changes that occurred with age in children’s responses to scenarios where they were asked to take on roles of people in a situation.
  • 60 children (30 boys, 30 girls - 20 of 4, 5 and 6 year olds) given a task which involved asking how each person felt in various scenarios and to describe and explain it.
52
Q

what did selman find in his research involving personal dilemmas (1971)?

A

a number of distinct levels of perspective-taking were identified and he found that the level of perspective-taking correlated with age, suggesting a clear developmental sequence.

53
Q

what are selman’s stages of development?

A

egocentric, social informational, self-reflective, mutual and societal.

54
Q

what is the egocentric stage?

A

stage 0 (3-6 years)
- children can’t easily separate the thoughts/emotions of themselves and others, they do not understand social behaviours that caused the emotions.

55
Q

what is the social informational stage?

A

stage 1 (6-8 years)
- a child recognises that people have access to different information so may have different perspectives but only see their view as valid.

56
Q

what is the self-reflective stage?

A

stage 2 (8-10 years)
- children can view things from others’ perspective and know others can do the same but only one view at a time.

57
Q

what is the mutual stage?

A

stage 3 (10-12 years)
- children are now able to view situations from multiple perspectives at the same time.

58
Q

what is the societal stage?

A

stage 4 (12+ years)
- individuals understand that people’s perspectives are shaped by societal values.

59
Q

what is development through these stages based on?

A

maturity and experience.

60
Q

what are the strengths of selman’s level of perspective-taking?

A

there are significant positive correlations between age and the ability to take multiple perspectives which is supported by the findings of longitudinal studies (gurucharni and selman, 1982) which have good validity due to the control for individual differences meaning that there is support from different lines of research.

buijzen and valkenburg (2008) found negative correlations between coercive shopping behaviour in children and both age and perspective-taking ability which suggests that there is a relationship between perspective-taking abilities and healthy social behaviour.
-> (counterpoint): gasser and keller (2009) found that bullies show normal perspective-taking which suggests no link between perspective-taking and healthy social development.

61
Q

what are the weaknesses of selman’s level of perspective-taking?

A

selman’s theory may be overly cognitive and fails to include other factors that impact a child’s development e.g. development of empathy, emotional self-regulation, parenting style, family climate, peer interactions etc. which means his approach to explaining social development is too narrow.

62
Q

what is theory of mind (ToM)?

A

it refers to the ability of understanding other people’s thoughts and emotions; ability to attribute mental states to others and it is believed to develop over time.

63
Q

what are false belief tasks?

A

developed to test whether children can understand that people can believe something that isn’t true.

64
Q

who came up with false belief tasks?

A

wimmer and perner (1983)

65
Q

what did wimmer and perner (1983) find and conclude?

A

they found that 3 year olds complete the task incorrectly and 4 year olds complete the task correctly, meaning that ToM shifts at 4 years old and becomes more advanced.

66
Q

why did 3 year olds complete the task incorrectly and 4 year olds correctly?

A

3 year olds think the other person will not think the same as them and 4 year olds understand that the other person will not think the same as them.

67
Q

what is autism?

A

a lifelong developmental disability which affects how people communicate and interact with the world.

68
Q

what is asperger’s syndrome?

A

it is considered to be on the ‘high functioning’ end of the spectrum.

69
Q

what is the link between ToM and autism?

A

children with autism and asperger’s syndrome are delayed in the development of their ToM due to deficits in social communication.

70
Q

what evidence is there for the link between ToM and autism?

A
  • children with autism and asperger’s syndrome show less pretend play or their pretence is limited to more rule-based formats (baron-cohen, 1987).
  • most children with autism and asperger’s syndrome are delayed in passing the false belief task test (baron-cohen et al, 1985).
  • children with autism and asperger’s syndrome are delayed by around 3 years in the skill of figuring out what might hurts another’s feelings despite their normal IQ (baron-cohen et al, 1999).
71
Q

what is the sally-anne task?

A

children are told that sally places a marble in her basket but when she isn’t looking, anne moves it to her box and the task is to work out where sally will look for her marble.

72
Q

who conducted the sally-anne task?

A

baron-cohen (1985).

73
Q

what did baron-cohen do in his study?

A

the sally-anne task was given individually to 20 autistic children, 27 non-autistic and 14 children with down syndrome (control groups).

74
Q

what did baron-cohen find in his study?

A

85% of children in control groups correctly identified where sally would look but only 20% of autistic children could.

75
Q

what did baron-cohen conclude in his study?

A

baron-cohen et al argued that this difference showed that autism involved a ToM deficit and this may be a complete explanation for autism.

76
Q

what did baron-cohen et al (1997) develop when testing ToM on older children and adults?

A

the eyes task

77
Q

what is the eyes task?

A

it involves reading complex emotions in pictures of faces just showing a small area around the eyes.

78
Q

what did baron-cohen et al (1997) find with the eyes task?

A

many autistic adults without a learning disability struggled with the eyes task which supports the idea that ToM deficits might be a cause of autism.

79
Q

what are the strengths of theory of mind?

A

the tests used to assess ToM are challenging for some autistic people which offers an explanation for why some autistic people may find social interaction difficult and it is assumed that most neurotypical people can ‘pick up’ other people’s thoughts and feelings with little effort meaning that ToM research has real-world relevance.
-> (counterpoint): not every autistic person experiences ToM issues and a lack of ToM cannot explain the cognitive strengths of autistic people which means that there must be other factors involved in autism.

80
Q

what are the weaknesses of theory of mind?

A

false belief tasks may require other cognitive abilities e.g. visual memory, failure on a false belief task may thus be due to a deficit in memory rather than ToM, some children who can engage in pretend play find false belief tasks difficult so they may not really measure ToM and therefore lacks key research evidence.

in intentional reasoning tasks a child might be visualising the beads task from the adult perspective rather than expressing a conscious understanding of their intention and in the sally-anne task, a child might be switching perspective between sally and anne meaning that tasks designed to measure ToM might actually measure perspective-taking.

81
Q

what are mirror neurons?

A

neurons that fire when an action is performed and when the same action is performed by another individual - the neuron ‘mirrors’ the behaviour that has been observed.

82
Q

what is the mirror neuron system?

A

it consists of mirror neurons distributed in several areas of the brain which may be involved in social cognition, allowing us to interpret intention and emotion in others.

83
Q

who came up with the evidence for the mirror neuron system?

A

rizzolatti et al. (2002)

84
Q

what did rizzolatti et al. (2002) do and find?

A

they were studying electrical activity in a monkey’s motor cortex when 1 of the researchers reached for his lunch in the monkey’s view and its motor cortex became activated in the same way as when it reached for food itself; further investigation revealed that it was the same brain cells that fired for both actions - mirror neurons.

85
Q

what gallese and goldman (1998) suggest about mirror neurons and intention?

A

they suggested that mirror neurons respond not just to observed actions but to intentions behind behaviour, they also suggested that we simulate others actions in our motor system and experience their intentions using our mirror neurons.

86
Q

what is the link between mirror neurons and perspective-taking?

A

if mirror neurons fire in response to others’ actions and intentions this may gives us a neural mechanism for experiencing and understanding other people’s perspectives and emotional states - allowing us to interpret what others are thinking and feeling.

87
Q

what did ramachandran (2011) suggest about mirror neurons and human evolution?

A

he suggested that mirror neurons have effectively shaped human evolution, the complex social interactions that we have require a brain system that facilitates an understanding of intention, emotion and perspective - without these cognitive abilities we could not live in large groups with the complex social roles and rules that characterise human culture - suggesting that mirror neurons are key to understanding the way humans have developed as social species.

88
Q

what did ramachandran and oberman (2006) propose about mirror neurons and autism?

A

they proposed the ‘broken mirror’ theory of autism.

89
Q

what is the ‘broken mirror’ theory of autism?

A

the idea that neurological deficits that include dysfunction in the mirror neuron system prevent a developing child imitating and understanding social behaviour in others.

90
Q

what can this ‘broken mirror’ theory suggest?

A

children later diagnosed typically mimic adult behaviour less than others, problems with the mirror neuron system lead to challenges in social communication as children do not fully develop the usual abilities to read intention and emotion in others.

91
Q

what are the strengths of the mirror neuron system?

A

haker et al (2012) found that levels of activity in brodmann’s area 9 (rich in mirror neurons) increased when participants yawned in response of watching people yawning - contagious yawning widely believed to be the result of empathy so this links mirror neuron activity to empathy and iacoboni et al (2005) showed that there was an increase in activity in inferior frontal gyrus (also rich in mirror neurons) when understanding intention behind hands grasps suggesting that these studies show that mirror neurons may play a role in aspects of social cognition.

hadjikhani (2007) found that pars opercularis has smaller thickness in autistic people (an era rich in mirror neurons and involved in perspective-taking) and nishitani et al (2004) also found activity lower in areas rich in mirror neurons in autistic people, suggesting that a cause of autism may be related to the mirror neuron system.
-> (counterpoint): review of 25 studies linking autism to brain structure/activity shows evidence is inconsistent (hamilton, 2013) meaning that there may not be a link between mirror neurons and autism.

92
Q

what are the weaknesses of the mirror neuron system?

A

animal studies involve implanting electrodes in the brain to study electrical activity in individual neurons but it is not ethical to do this on humans, instead scanning techniques are used but they only measure brain activity not individual cells, meaning that measuring mirror neuron activity in humans is difficult and there is not direct evidence for it either.