Social Influence & Atrocity Flashcards

(29 cards)

1
Q

Social Influence

A

• influence of others on you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Conformity

A

Someone changes their perception, opinion & behaviors in ways that are consistent with group norms

  1. Compliance
  2. Acceptance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Compliance

A
  • Conformity that involves publicly acting or going along with others, while privately disagreeing
  • ex: you are new at work & everybody is going to applebees & you hate applebees, but go anyway to conform with the group norm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Acceptance

A

• Conformity that involves both going along AND privately agreeing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why do we conform?

A
  • Normative influence

* Informational Influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Normative influence

A
  • to be liked or accepted by others

* ex: smoke in the room experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Informative influence

A

• to solve uncertainty & get info about what is the right thing to do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What increases informational influence?

A
  • Crisis (ex: 9/11)
  • When others are experts
  • When being accurate is important
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Emotional Contagion in Groups

A
  • Transfer of moods and emotions among ppl in groups or in group settings.
  • positive: sports, happiness in friendship groups.
  • negative: anxiety, negative thoughts at work
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Groupthink: “going along to get along”

A
  • Mode of thinking
  • don’t really aim for the best decision
  • desire for harmony, agreement & don’t want to rock the boat.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the characteristics of group thinks?

A
  • feeling of invulnerability
  • tendency to ignore/discredit info
  • stress from external threats
  • influential leader
  • self-censorship (deciding out of fear)
  • isolation from outside influences`
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Social Roles: Zimbardo Experiment

A
  • shared expectations about how a person who occupies a particular position is supposed to behave or act
  • Results: guards become abusive, prisoners became passive & withdrawn.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Leadership Obedience

A

Complying with a direct command from an authority figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Milgrim’s Shock experiment

A
  • “how we respond to authority:
  • results: 65% went all the way to the end
  • shows power of the situation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Reasons for obedience

A
  • Socialized to follow order
  • Informational social influence
  • Self-consistency (if you already started, might as well finish)
  • Doing bad for, “good” reason
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Public conformity

A

Superficial change done publicly

17
Q

Private conformity

A

Chance of belief that occurs privately

18
Q

Idiosyncrasy Credit

A

• “credit” person earns by following group norms

19
Q

Transactive Memory

A
• shared system to remember
• for success:
1. Trust
2. Division of knowledge
3. Effort
4. Know who knows what
5. Communication
20
Q

Social Dilemma

A

• Good for one, bad for everybody else

21
Q

Group polorization

A

• exaggerations of tendencies in “group think”

22
Q

Biased Sampling

A

• spending more time sharing known info, rather than spending more time sharing UNKNOWN info

23
Q

Social impact theory

A
  1. Strength (how important the ppl are)
  2. Immediacy (how close you are to the ppl)
  3. # of people: how many ppl are in the group
24
Q

Genocide

A

• Deliberate & systematic destruction of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group

25
Internal bystanders
• Within the population that act like everything is normal, ignore the violence & often participate in discriminating against the victims
26
External bystanders
* outside groups looking in * typically remain passive * use minimal intervention
27
5 steps to inhumanity via IDENTITY
1. Create an in-group 2. Exclusion, exclude out group 3. Threat, place out group as threat 4. Virtue, represent the ingroup as GOOD 5. Celebration, celebrate inhumanity as defense of heroism
28
Milgram defense
Results of the study made the study unethical
29
Ethics & The Institutional Review Board
* Participants should be treated with care and respect | * Researchers must tell the participants what they are getting into