Social Psychology & Law Flashcards

1
Q

Decision to shoot (Planet, 2011)

A

Results: Quickest to shoot black men over black women as well as white men and white women.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Masculinity & decision to shoot black suspects (Goff, 2012)

A

Results: Participants that were more insecure about masculinity were more likely to shoot black suspects relative to white.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Looking deathworthy (Eberhardt, 2006)

A
  • Results (White victims): Stereotypically black defendants received the death penalty much more than less stereotypically black defendants.
  • Results (black victims): No significant difference in likelihood of getting the death penalty.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Own-race bias

A

People are better at recognizing faces of their own race

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Weapon focus

A

Presence of gun impairs eyewitness’s ability to accurately identify a perpetrator’s face

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

False memory

A

Recalling events that never occurred or occurred differently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Misinformation effect

A

• Happens when witnesses talk to each other
• Witnessing an event
1. receiving misinformation about it
2. incorporating the “misinformation” into one’s memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Individual bias in the criminal justice system: Dror & Charlton (2006)

A
  • Changed env. info about the case (not the fingerprint)

* results: 2/3 of experts reversed their decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Questioning & Misinformation effect (Loftus & Palmer, 1974)

A
  • Framing

* By changing a word, different perceptions on how fast the car was going.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Guilt of suspect

A
  • Trained to suspect guilt

* results: Interrogators that underwent training were less accurate but more confident in their judgements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the 5 steps to securing a confession?

A
  1. Control the situation – small room, minimize distractions
  2. Distort perceptions of the crime – Make it sound worst than what it was or make it sound less serious than what it was
  3. Sympathize with the suspect – Good cop/bad cop
  4. Encourage self-doubt – Point out physical symptoms
  5. Present false evidence of guilt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Psychology of false confessions

A
  1. Voluntary
  2. Coerced-complaint
  3. Coerced-internalized
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Psychology of false confessions: Voluntary

A

involving no external pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Psychology of false confessions: coerced-complaint

A

person knows they are not guilty, but confess to receive a promised reward (or avoid penalty)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Psychology of false confessions: coerced-internalized

A

Innocent suspect induced to believe (sometimes temporarily) that he/she is guilty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Polygraph

A
  • records physiological arousal from multiple channels

* often used as a lie detector test

17
Q

Voir dire

A

• pretrial examination of prospective jurors by the judge or opposing lawyers to uncover signs of bias

18
Q

Peremptory challenge

A

• means by which lawyers can exclude a limited number of perspective jurors w/o judges approval

19
Q

Scientific Jury selection

A

• Selecting juries through surveys that yield demographics & trial relevant attitudes

20
Q

Death qualification

A

• jury-selection procedure used in capital cases that permits judges to exclude prospective jurors who say they would not vote for the death penalty

21
Q

Sentencing disparity

A

• inconsistency of sentences for the same offense from one judge to another

22
Q

Adversarial Model

A

• Dispute-resolution system in which the prosecution & defense present opposing sides of the story

23
Q

Inquisitorial model

A

• dispute-resolution system in which neutral investigator gathers evident from both sides & presents findings in court.

24
Q

Power of innocence (Kassin & Norwick, 2004)

A

• participants who were truly innocent were significantly more likely than guilty suspects (78%) to sign a waiver of their miranda rights

25
Q

Defense attorney & plea reccomendations (Edkins, 2010)

A

• Defense attorneys more likely to recommend longer sentences to black suspects, compared to white suspects.

26
Q

Torture & Judgements of Guilt (Gray & Weger, 2010)

A

• Participants rated other students as guiltier in high pain, compared to low pain.

27
Q

What are some ways to improve eyewitness procedures?

A
  • use double-blind procedures to administer line-ups & sequential line ups
  • Changing the situation & false confessions: power of videotape confessions, have entire confession tape can reveal tactics used to get to the confession.
28
Q

Judges understanding scientific evidence (Kovera & McAuliff, 2000)

A

• Trained judges were better able to distinguish good vs. bad studies and less likely to admit studies with poor quality.