Social Policy Flashcards

(19 cards)

1
Q

1944 Education Act

A
  • introduced compulsary state education up to 14 years
  • set up tri-partite system to supposably get ‘equal status’ in schools
  • children sat 11+ that measured innate ability
  • if passed, went to grammer school
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How many children went to grammer schools due to 1944 Education Act

A

Approx 20%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were the aims of 1944 Education Act?

A
  • to abolish inequality
  • 11+ was seen as fair and scientific way to measure abililty people were ‘born with’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What were the strengths of 1944 Education Act?

A
  • upward social mobility for working class children who passed 11+
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the weaknesses of 1944 Education Act?

A
  • students who didn’t pass were labelled ‘failures’ and not allowed to sit exams
  • written in elaborated code that W.C students couldn’t understand so more M.C students went
  • there were fewer spaces for girls and a higher pass rate for girls to attend
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

1965 Comprehensive Education Act

A
  • Abolished selection at age 11
  • aimed to educate all children in the same school regardless of class, gender, ethnicity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the aims of 1965 Comprehensive Education Act?

A

believed that meritocratic ideals were more likely to appear in comprehensive systems so everyone should have the same opportunities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were the strenghts of 1965 Comprehensive Education Act?

A

It recognised ‘late bloomers’ and that children develop at different rates so grouped through sets and streaming instead of 11+

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the weaknesses of 1965 Comprehensive Education Act?

A
  • private schools still existed for wealthy (7% of UK kids)
  • inequality between schools –> inequality within schools
  • not all grammer schools shut down
  • comprehensive lacked discipline and got poor results
  • failed to prepare students for work
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did The Education Reform Act 1988 feature?

A

Testing
National Curriculum
League Tables
Open enrolment
Etc…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What perspective was The Education Reform Act 1988?

A

The New Right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were the aims of The Education Reform Act 1988?

A

that marketisation would increase competion between school and so parentocracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the result of The Education Reform Act 1988?

A

School grades did improve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were the weaknesses of The Education Reform Act 1988?

A
  • still gender, class, ethnicity inequalities in results
  • testing = stress
    money spent on marketing (advertising) instead of education
  • fewer places in ‘best schools’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are city academies?

A

introduced to improve standards in deprived working-class communities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are sure start centres?

A

Offered childcare, play sessions, parenting advice and employment coaching

17
Q

What were the New Labour Policy (1997-2010) aims?

A

specialist schools
- schools that were expert in 1 in 10 subjects

18
Q

What were Conservative Education Policy (2010+) aims?

A
  1. Trebling (make 3 times as much) tuition fees
  2. Pupil premium
  3. Education Maintanence Allowance
  4. GCSE and ALevels Reform (2016)
19
Q

Ball

A

On 1988 Education Reform Act
Argues these policies benefit middle-class families who have the resources to exploit school choice so reinforcing rather than reducing inequality