Studies for exam Flashcards

1
Q

Bryan & Test

A

social modelling

broken down car on motorway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sherif

A

conformity

autokinetic effect - dots on screen movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Asch

A

conformity

line judgement task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Freedman & Fraser (1966)

A

foot in the door

assigned to request v no request

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cialdini et. al (1975)

A

door in the face

assigned request v no request

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Santos et. al (1994)

A

pique

asking for donation 37c or quarter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Asch

A

obedience

punishment shocking thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Freeman et. al (1975)

A

social impact theory - decreases as targets increase

tipping of server parties of 1-6 people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Norman Triplett (1898)

A

presence of others
cycling race
faster when in competition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Sherif et. al (1954)

A

realistic conference theory - robbers cave

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Hovard & Sears (1940)

A

intergroup violence

drop of cotton prices = more lynchings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Adler et. al (2000)

A

relative deprivation
stress study
greater deprivation = sleep hard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cohen et. al (2008)

A

relative deprivation
virus study
low in subjective deprivation = low in cold(20%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Walker & Maan (1987)

A

relative deprivation
unemployed australians
IBD lead to stress, GBD leas to protest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Taifel et. al (1971)

A

minimal group paradigm
distributing money to in/out group
75% favoured in group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Dijk, Koenig, Ketelaar & de Jong (2011)

A

blushing + trustworthiness
defects second round
blushing restores trustworthiness

17
Q

Feinberg, Willer, Keltner

A

embarrassment + prosociality

reported greater tendency to feel embarrassed = more prosocial in game

18
Q

Leary et. al (1995)

A

sociometer

rated valuableness

19
Q

Williams et. al (2000)

A

cyberball task

20
Q

Williams et. al (2000)

A

rejection conformity study
using asch line thing but geometric shapes
rejected more likely to say they had seen shapes if they hadnt

21
Q

Leary et. al (1995)

A

prosociality to excluders

spicy food thing

22
Q

Maner et. al (2007)

A

connection vs aggression
excluded participants allocated less reward to partner who chose to leave
mor reward to new partner

23
Q

Spencer, Steele & Quinn (1999)

A

stereotype threat

women do worse in maths test when told about gender differences

24
Q

Davies, Spencer & Steele (2005)

A

stereotype threat
future aspirations in leadership
gendered commercials, gendered ad condition = women chose problem solving, men not bothered

25
Q

Woodcock et. al (2012)

A

domain disidenitification
asked about being a scientist
high threat = less identification

26
Q

Greenwald (1998)

A

implicit association test (attitudes)
attitude object paired with good/bad word
faster reaction time showed stronger association between attitude and negative/positive feelings

27
Q

Miller & Morrison (2009)

A

attitudes on alcohol

if thought others did not support alcohol, did not talk about it

28
Q

Kunda (1987)

A

vested interests

women and coffee

29
Q

Mata et. al (2015)

A

elaboration likelihood model

smoking and depressed table heuristic processing

30
Q

Wolsko, Ariceaga & Seiden (2016)

A

jiu jitsu

climate change for americans messages

31
Q

Bryan et. al (2016)

A

jiu jitsu persuasion

teenagers eating healthily through ads

32
Q

Maddux & Rogers (1983)

A

fear
smoking
high fear + efficacy = high intention
low efficacy + high fear = less intention to quit

33
Q

Kahneman & Deaton (2010)

A

income and swb
measured SWB and stress
happiness plateaus at a point

34
Q

Luttner (2004)

A

income swb

unhappier when neighbours earn more than them

35
Q

Brickman et. al (1978)

A

income and swb
serious life events - lotto + paralysis
lottery winners not happier than control
paralysed enjoyed everyday as much as controls

36
Q

Lucas (2007)

A

set point theory
starting points then marriage/widowhood unemplyment
does set point change

37
Q

Simmons, Nelson & Simonsohn (2011)

A

replication crisis