Term 2 Lecture 4 Flashcards
(30 cards)
Summary of this lecture,
- if the consumer consistently chooses the most preferred among affordable bundles, then
It is possible to give a complete description of the properties demands must satisfy, to see this, it is illuminating to think of consumers as expenditure minimisers subject to utility constraints.
What is the consumer optimisation problem
Max u(q), s.t. p’q < y
- then choices satisfy WARP, in fact, the assumption of consumer optimisation is equivalent to SARP
- therefore, utility maximising choices satisfy negativity, homogeneity and assuming non-satiation - adding up.
If a consumer’s preferences are monotonic and convex
The optimal choice occurs at a tangency point between an IC and the budget line
- at MRS = p1/p2
- if the budget set is linear, this can occur either in the interior of the budget set or at a corner
Interior vs Corner solutions
- if the tangency condition holds, the consumer consumes positive amounts off both goods
- if there is no tangency point, consumer may only consume one good, this happens when MRS never equals the prive ratio
Unique vs multiple tangencies
- if the budget set is linear and convex, then there is a unique tangency
- if the budget set is non convex, there may be multiple tangency points, so in these cases compare the utility levels to find the true optimum
Whats a marshalian demand curve?
Also known as uncompensated demand curve
- if you solve the utility maximisation problem for quantities x and y, you get these demand functions.
Graphically why cant there be multiple points of tangency on a linear budget set compared to non-linear
- on linear, the ICs would intersect, which is not possible
- on non-linear, you can find multiple tangencies without any crossing of ICs
Impact of income increasing on slope of budget constraints
- relation to IEP
Slope of budget constraint doesn’t change
- IEPs traced out by the tangencies as incomes are increased therefore all occur at points with the same MRS
What is homotheticity for a utility function characterised by?
- homothetic if the MRS remains constant along rays from the origin
- IEPs are straight lines through the origin
- so as income increases, the consumer’s budget shares remain constant
Marshallian demand under homotheticity:
- budget shares
Fi(y,p) = ai(p)y
- fi(y,p) = demand for good i as a function of income y and prices
- ai(p) = a function that depends only on prices, not on income
- this means demand is proportional to income
Budget shares: wi = piai(p)
A utility function is quasilinear if
The MRS is constant along lines parallel to one of the axes
- QL preferences imply that income only affects the consumption of one good
- if income increases, extra income is spent only on the QL good
- since demand for other goods dont change with income, IEPs are parallel to one of the axes
QL Marshallian Demand Functions take the form:
F1(y,p) = (y-B(p))/p1, this is the demand for the QL good
Fi(y,p) = bi(p), this is demand for all other good, which depend only on prices, not income
Y is income, B(p) is total expenditure on all goods apart from f1, and as you can see demand for all other goods is not affected by income
Solving: min p’q s.t. U(q) >/ v
Gives you the expenditure minimisation problem, which, leads to the same tangency condition as the utility maximisation problem
What are Hicksian demand functions, also known as compensated demand functions?
Arise from the expenditure minimisation problem:
- q = g(v,p), v being the fixed level of utility
- since common scaling of all prices implies no change in the slopes of any budget lines, it also implies no change in expenditure minimising demands at any utility.
- therefore, Hicksian demands are homogenous of degree 0
Hicksian demands under homotheticity
- just as Marshallian demand scales proportionally with income under homothetic preferences, Hicksian demand scales proportionally with utility
- gi(v,p) = ai(p).k(v), where k(v) is an increasing function of utility
- as v increases, demand scales up proportionally
Hicksian demands under QL
- an increase in utility affects only one good’s demand, leaving the others unchanged.
- g1(v,p) = k(v) + B(p)
- gi(v,p) = bi(p)
How to get the indirect utility function
- substitute the marshallian demand functions back into the utility function gives the indirect utility function:
V(y,p) = u(f(y,p))
How to get the expenditure function
Min p’q s.t. U(q) >/ v
- leads to the Hicksian demand function
- substitute this demand function into the expenditure equation to get the expenditure function:
C(v,p) = p’g(v,p)
Duality of the marshallian and Hicksian demands
Subbing the expenditure function into the marshallian demand function gives the Hicksian demand
- subbing the expenditure function into y in the indirect utility function gives you v
- subbing the indirect utility function into v in the expenditure function gives you y
The expenditure function
Tells us the minimum cost required to reach a utility level v given p
- increasing in every price in p and in v
- homogenous of degree 1, Hicksian demands are homogenous of degree 1
- concave in prices
Indirect utility function
- increasing in y and decreasing in each element of p
- homogenous of degree zero in y and p
Shepherd’s Lemma
- how to get from expenditure function to the Hicksian demands
By differentiating c(v,p)
- Dc(v,p)/Dpi = …. = gi(v,p), using the first order condition for solving the cost min problem and the fact that utility is held constant
You can go from expenditure function to Hicksian demands
Roys identity
- how to go from the Marshallian demand functions straight from the indirect utility function
- v(c(v,p),p) = v
- differentiate both sides with respect to pi
- rearrange
- by Shepards Lemma, we know (Dc(v,p))/Dpi = g(v,p)
Roys identity: fi(y,p) = -((Dv(y,p)/Dpi)/(Dv(y,p)/Dy))
Slutsky Equation
- differentiate with respect to p
- compensated price effect (Hicksian Demand) = uncompensated price effect (Marshallian demand) + (marshallian demand for good j).(income effect)
- also negativity applies, so Hicksian demand curves always slope downward, as an increase in price always reduces demand when utility is held constant