Term 2 Lecture 4 Flashcards

(30 cards)

1
Q

Summary of this lecture,
- if the consumer consistently chooses the most preferred among affordable bundles, then

A

It is possible to give a complete description of the properties demands must satisfy, to see this, it is illuminating to think of consumers as expenditure minimisers subject to utility constraints.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the consumer optimisation problem

A

Max u(q), s.t. p’q < y
- then choices satisfy WARP, in fact, the assumption of consumer optimisation is equivalent to SARP
- therefore, utility maximising choices satisfy negativity, homogeneity and assuming non-satiation - adding up.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

If a consumer’s preferences are monotonic and convex

A

The optimal choice occurs at a tangency point between an IC and the budget line
- at MRS = p1/p2
- if the budget set is linear, this can occur either in the interior of the budget set or at a corner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Interior vs Corner solutions

A
  • if the tangency condition holds, the consumer consumes positive amounts off both goods
  • if there is no tangency point, consumer may only consume one good, this happens when MRS never equals the prive ratio
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Unique vs multiple tangencies

A
  • if the budget set is linear and convex, then there is a unique tangency
  • if the budget set is non convex, there may be multiple tangency points, so in these cases compare the utility levels to find the true optimum
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Whats a marshalian demand curve?

A

Also known as uncompensated demand curve
- if you solve the utility maximisation problem for quantities x and y, you get these demand functions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Graphically why cant there be multiple points of tangency on a linear budget set compared to non-linear

A
  • on linear, the ICs would intersect, which is not possible
  • on non-linear, you can find multiple tangencies without any crossing of ICs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Impact of income increasing on slope of budget constraints
- relation to IEP

A

Slope of budget constraint doesn’t change
- IEPs traced out by the tangencies as incomes are increased therefore all occur at points with the same MRS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is homotheticity for a utility function characterised by?

A
  • homothetic if the MRS remains constant along rays from the origin
  • IEPs are straight lines through the origin
  • so as income increases, the consumer’s budget shares remain constant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Marshallian demand under homotheticity:
- budget shares

A

Fi(y,p) = ai(p)y
- fi(y,p) = demand for good i as a function of income y and prices
- ai(p) = a function that depends only on prices, not on income
- this means demand is proportional to income

Budget shares: wi = piai(p)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A utility function is quasilinear if

A

The MRS is constant along lines parallel to one of the axes
- QL preferences imply that income only affects the consumption of one good
- if income increases, extra income is spent only on the QL good
- since demand for other goods dont change with income, IEPs are parallel to one of the axes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

QL Marshallian Demand Functions take the form:

A

F1(y,p) = (y-B(p))/p1, this is the demand for the QL good
Fi(y,p) = bi(p), this is demand for all other good, which depend only on prices, not income

Y is income, B(p) is total expenditure on all goods apart from f1, and as you can see demand for all other goods is not affected by income

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Solving: min p’q s.t. U(q) >/ v

A

Gives you the expenditure minimisation problem, which, leads to the same tangency condition as the utility maximisation problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are Hicksian demand functions, also known as compensated demand functions?

A

Arise from the expenditure minimisation problem:
- q = g(v,p), v being the fixed level of utility
- since common scaling of all prices implies no change in the slopes of any budget lines, it also implies no change in expenditure minimising demands at any utility.
- therefore, Hicksian demands are homogenous of degree 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Hicksian demands under homotheticity

A
  • just as Marshallian demand scales proportionally with income under homothetic preferences, Hicksian demand scales proportionally with utility
  • gi(v,p) = ai(p).k(v), where k(v) is an increasing function of utility
  • as v increases, demand scales up proportionally
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Hicksian demands under QL

A
  • an increase in utility affects only one good’s demand, leaving the others unchanged.
  • g1(v,p) = k(v) + B(p)
  • gi(v,p) = bi(p)
17
Q

How to get the indirect utility function

A
  • substitute the marshallian demand functions back into the utility function gives the indirect utility function:
    V(y,p) = u(f(y,p))
18
Q

How to get the expenditure function

A

Min p’q s.t. U(q) >/ v
- leads to the Hicksian demand function
- substitute this demand function into the expenditure equation to get the expenditure function:

C(v,p) = p’g(v,p)

19
Q

Duality of the marshallian and Hicksian demands

A

Subbing the expenditure function into the marshallian demand function gives the Hicksian demand

  • subbing the expenditure function into y in the indirect utility function gives you v
  • subbing the indirect utility function into v in the expenditure function gives you y
20
Q

The expenditure function

A

Tells us the minimum cost required to reach a utility level v given p
- increasing in every price in p and in v
- homogenous of degree 1, Hicksian demands are homogenous of degree 1
- concave in prices

21
Q

Indirect utility function

A
  • increasing in y and decreasing in each element of p
  • homogenous of degree zero in y and p
22
Q

Shepherd’s Lemma
- how to get from expenditure function to the Hicksian demands

A

By differentiating c(v,p)
- Dc(v,p)/Dpi = …. = gi(v,p), using the first order condition for solving the cost min problem and the fact that utility is held constant

You can go from expenditure function to Hicksian demands

23
Q

Roys identity
- how to go from the Marshallian demand functions straight from the indirect utility function

A
  • v(c(v,p),p) = v
  • differentiate both sides with respect to pi
  • rearrange
  • by Shepards Lemma, we know (Dc(v,p))/Dpi = g(v,p)

Roys identity: fi(y,p) = -((Dv(y,p)/Dpi)/(Dv(y,p)/Dy))

24
Q

Slutsky Equation

A
  • differentiate with respect to p
  • compensated price effect (Hicksian Demand) = uncompensated price effect (Marshallian demand) + (marshallian demand for good j).(income effect)
  • also negativity applies, so Hicksian demand curves always slope downward, as an increase in price always reduces demand when utility is held constant
25
Compensated cross price derivative relations
Symmetric - holding utility constant, the effect of increasing the price of one good on the quantity chosen of another is numerically identical to the effect of increasing the price of the other good on the q chosen of the 1st good
26
Adding up condition
Demands must lie on the budget constraint - p’f(y,p) = y - p’g(v,p) = c(v,p)
27
Homogeneity
Increasing all incomes and prices in proportion leaves the budget constraint and therefore demands unaffected - fi(y,p) = fi(ky,kp) - gi(v,p) = gi(v,kp)
28
Negativity of compensated own price effects
in particular, a compensated increase in any good’s price can only reduce demand for that good - slutsky equation.
29
Symmetry of compensated cross price effects
Effect of change in price of good 1 on good 2 same as change in price of good 2 on good 1
30
We know a system of demands is intégrable if any of the following hold:
- they were derived as solutions to the utility max or expenditure min problem given a well specified direct utility function - derived by Shephard’s Lemma from a well specified cost function or they were derived by RI from a well specified indirect utility function - they satisfy adding up, homogeneity, symmetry and negativity