Textbook Flashcards
safe injection sites
- harm reduction
harm reduction: reduce harmful consequence assoc w illicit drug use other high risk activities for ppl unable/unwilling to stop.
safe injection sites: pros + cons
pro: health + social benefits. gateway to medical + social services. cleaner practice = lower blood-borne disease = save lives + fewer hc costs to treat those conditions. encourage treatment programs.
con: illicit drug use by sanitizing +legitimizing.
- decriminaliing
delisting sex reassignment
provinces delist then re-instate. feds delist for incarcerated.
medically necessary deemed how?
condition, whether condition is severe enough to impinge significanlty upon quality of life, jeopardize psycho-social functioning + if med treatment will ameliorate condition.
risk-benefit ratio.
post-retrenchment in 1998 what happened?
demand for wage increase, competition btw provinces, nurse shortage = health care costs increased rapidly.
hc in 2001 - what trends in hospital vs outpatient, data, etc
fewer beds in line with other countries. more outpatient.
provinces gain control of cost - data helps funding be allocated of projection rather than physician-directed.
data - help manage performance of system.
CHST - effects on provinces
canada health + social transfer.
- fedreduced amount of money to province, allowed them to spend money however they want. annual increase removed, funding will change year-to-year. hard for province to plan for future needs when dunno money comign in.
CHST: what actually happened?
fed got deficits under control + gave one-time contribtions to provicnes.
launched period of steady growth.
paul martin + CHST
split cht and cst.
= more transparent by ID-ing money specific to health care vs social
= annual increase reinstated. 6% annual increase until 2014.
- fed establish program of national important: Wait time reductin fund. set aside money for provinces to use to reduce wait times.
what 5 areas did wait time reduction fund focus on ?
cancer treatment, heart procedures, disagnostic imaging, joint replacement, eye restoration.
Harper in 2011, renegotiations for funding post-2016
annual increase would be tied to economic growth. never fall below 3%. distributing funds on per capita basis rather than disproportionately transferring to poorer provinces.
- no national goals funding
- no negotiations.
- hands-off approach of fed govt to hc.
- innovation and improvement is province own issue to deal with.s
implication of no national goals
data on hc performance btw provinces no longer comparable bc independent innovations
distn of expenditure of hc
shift from hospital (45% to 29.1%) to outpatient.
physician expenditure 15% - 13.6%. rank slipping. hosptial + drug take more expenditure.
drug expenditure increased from 6% (1975) to 16% in 2009.
issue in shifting expenditures?
public vs private.
public services through provincial health insurance plans or private, out-of pocket and maybe reimbursed by commercial for-profit insurance. shift into privitization of hc.
are we moving to privitization?
public takes 70 % cost whereas private takes 30%. mainly for hosptial, physician + public health tho. for drugs, dentist chiro etc. more private money than public.
public reinvestment in other areas to pick up costs.
quebec, SCC what the ruling meant?
narrowly decided that no privaate is unconstitutional.
allowed quebec to have private parallel to public.
rules to private being parallel to public
guaranteed wait time for procedure + docs who move to private must completely opt out of public hc
why do docs have to opt of of public if moving to private?
remove incentive for docs operating in public to increase wait times to persuade public to pay higher fee for rapid service in private system.
define rationing of health care
any mechanism that allows ppl to go without beneficial health care services
why is rationing health care issue
suggests that withholding hc will have tragic consequence for health + well-being
emmet hall + Hc
discussed consequences to Canadians when fed govt chose not to proceed with recommendation that pharmaceuticals and home care be covered under provincial health insurance.
implication of presentation that HC system in crisis
groups with vested interests argue for crisis.
- no evidence that cant afford hc system. suggests crisis is politically constructed
- not without blemish tho
what are eclectics?
practiced form of botanical medicine in North America for nearly 200 years, involve complex combination of plant extracts to treat illness
emmett hall with SC, royal commission on health ervices. evaluating existing and future needs for health services
used other countries for reference on how to improve.
- recommend sask model all over canada
- recommend perscription meds, prosthetics + home care insured.
- dental + optometry services provided for children + welfare recipients