social construction of tech Flashcards

1
Q

when does death occur?

A

tech advancing, change in distinguishing how ppl move towards death.

cardiac vs brain death. are organ donors dead?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

hassan rasouli story

A

brain damage as result of infection following surgery

in persistent vegetative state - docs say wanna withdraw life support.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is PVS

A

an intermediate step between life + brain death

  • body capable of growth/development + absence of response to stimuli
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

define brain death?

A

entails loss of awareness, lack of reflexes, absence of response to stimuli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hassan rasouli - family perspective

A

belief that Hassan was recovering + would soon gain consciousness.
- removing life support violates religious beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hassan Rasouli - doc’s perspective

A

medical futility

= constrain cost of HC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is medical futility?

A

high work demands,
inadequate staffing, poor work morale/low social support, work-life balance (manned 24 hrs a day, out of sync with family)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hassan Rasouli case - who decides?

A

fam takes to court. SC. still going.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

SC decision

A

Family wins = doctors do not have unilateral right to overrule - in this case circumvented “care + capacity boards” to to do their own thing.

  • Hassan showed signs of responding inconsistently to stimuli - upgrade status to minimally conscious.
  • prognosis uncertain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

ambiguity of PVS - explain

A

PVS -> brain death.
systematically + meaningfully respond to stimuli. ambiguous + subjective

-> emotional, consequential decision. cost of care is high

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

the right to die - margot bentley

A

former nurse. diagnosed with Alzheimer’s.

  • Margot had living will: life support withdrawn when reaches advanced stage.
  • entered nursing home + not let go at PVS state. difficult to know if responses are meaningful or arbitrary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Margot - family perspective

A

staff feed her despite wishes to cease + allow her to die.

  • feeding is reflex, margot isnt there.
  • right to die respected
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Margot - nursing home perspective

A

food isnt treatment. patient accept food confirms by their actions that they want to eat.
- concern that if fail to provide = negligence. legally responsible/liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

similarity btw Margot + Hassan cases

A

ambiguity over PVS (interpretation - random or intentional. tech measure, not meaningful)
who gets to decide?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bill C-14

A

prohibition against physician-assisted dying violated rights of competent adults who are suffering intolerably as result of grievous and irremediable medical condition; infringement of the rights of an individual and not justified

= right to decide what happens to them as they approach death
=tech can prolong life + suffering. who can say what happens? doc or patient? doc wants power, patient wants choise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

conditions under which physician-assisted death is permitted

A
  • suffering grievous and irremediable medical condition + death must be “reasonably foreseeable” (ambiguous)
  • mentally competent and capable of making decisions at moment service is provide
17
Q

how many physician-assisted in Canada?

A

4000 since law came into effect

1.1% of all deaths

18
Q

why is PAD controversial?

A

restrictive - 1/6 requested get approved (need more efficiently + responsibly; consent on day of. know + understand consequence)

  • under 18 not eligible (is 17yoa too young to understand death?)
  • suffering with mental illness not eligible (treatment dont work, request PAD - claim turned down)
19
Q

Adam Clayton-Meier

A

various mental disorders
- anxiety, OCD, various personality disorders = never cured. no longer wanted to live. rejected from PAD.
committed suicide in 2017

20
Q

issues with mental disorder + PAD?

A

appropriate to allow ppl to get medical assistance when cant obtain medial assistance for treatment?
- belgium + netherlands permit mental illness + PAD