The Determination to be Free Flashcards
Chapter 9 (203 cards)
What is ‘The Determination to Be Free’?
The development of the determination to be free from cyclic existence, also known as renunciation.
What analogy does the chapter use to illustrate the importance of knowing the faults of samsara to develop the determination to be free?
The analogy of a prison inmate who clearly lists the faults of being incarcerated and thus develops a strong determination to be free and makes a plan for release.
What does the chapter suggest is the result of clearly knowing the faults of rebirth (e.g., through the twelve links)?
It leads to a strong determination to be free from cyclic existence.
Once the determination to be free is generated, what are the subsequent steps mentioned?
Seeking liberation, learning its characteristics, understanding the causes to attain it, creating those causes, and persevering until genuine freedom is attained.
What are two main benefits of meditating on the twelve links of dependent origination, according to the chapter, which supports the determination to be free?
It leads to a deep understanding of causal dependence and emptiness, and their compatibility.
How does meditating on dependent origination (causal dependence) help one avoid the two extremes, thus supporting a balanced determination to be free?
It helps to avoid absolutism (eternalism) by seeing that nothing arises independently, and nihilism by seeing that causes do produce effects, which clarifies the nature of samsara that one wishes to be free from.
What does understanding the dependent nature of each link of the twelve links reveal about samsara, relevant to renunciation?
That each link, and thus our entire samsaric existence, is dependent on specific causes and conditions and does not arise independently or from a permanent cause, making it changeable and escapable.
How does understanding the dependent nature of the twelve links counteract the view of a permanent, independent self that might hinder true renunciation?
It shows that our existence is a process of conditioned links, without a fixed, independent entity undergoing them, which makes the idea of liberating a ‘solid self’ from a ‘solid samsara’ more nuanced.
What does the chapter say about the view of bodhisattvas regarding cyclic existence in relation to maturing living beings, and how does this relate to their renunciation?
Bodhisattvas view cyclic existence as a beneficial field for maturing beings. Their renunciation is not of helping beings in samsara, but of being personally bound by its afflictions and karma.
Do bodhisattvas view great nirvāṇa (the cessation of arhats) as beneficial for their goal of maturing beings?
No, from the perspective of their compassionate aim to mature all beings, a bodhisattva does not see an arhat’s nirvana (which involves cessation of rebirths) as the ultimate way to benefit others continuously.
What is the limitation if bodhisattvas themselves continue to take rebirth under the control of afflictions and karma, even if they wish to help others?
Their ability to benefit others will be extremely limited, and they cannot accomplish their own goal of full awakening or help others fully if they are still personally afflicted.
What kind of nirvana do bodhisattvas seek, which reflects their profound determination to be free yet also to benefit all beings?
Non-abiding nirvana (apratiṣṭhita-nirvāṇa).
What are the two extremes that a bodhisattva with non-abiding nirvana is free from, demonstrating a unique form of renunciation?
They are free from samsara (the extreme of continued suffering due to their own afflictions and karma) and from the personal peace of an arhat’s nirvana (the extreme of solitary peace without maximal benefit to others).
According to Bhāvaviveka’s Heart of the Middle Way, why do bodhisattvas not remain in cyclic existence (in the ordinary, afflicted sense)?
Because they see the faults of cyclic existence (due to their wisdom having generated renunciation of personal entrapment).
According to Bhāvaviveka, why do bodhisattvas not remain in (an arhat’s) nirvana, despite their renunciation of samsara?
Because they care for others (due to their great compassion).
What is the resolve of bodhisattvas regarding remaining in cyclic existence, according to Bhāvaviveka, and how does this demonstrate skillful renunciation?
They resolve to remain in cyclic existence (through chosen, controlled rebirths as emanations) in order to fulfill the needs of others, demonstrating a renunciation of personal ease for the sake of altruism.
What is the Sanskrit term often used for ‘the determination to be free’ or ‘renunciation’?
Niḥsaraṇa or naiṣkramya.
What is the Tibetan term for ‘the determination to be free’ or ‘renunciation’?
Nges ‘byung (nges-par ‘byung-ba).
What is the literal meaning of the Tibetan term ‘nges ‘byung’?
‘Definitely arising’ or ‘definitely emerging’ (from the causes of suffering and suffering itself).
What are we seeking to ‘definitely emerge’ from when cultivating the determination to be free?
All forms of duḥkha (suffering) and its root causes (karma and afflictions) that characterize cyclic existence in all its realms.
Is the determination to be free primarily an external action of abandoning things, or an internal state of mind?
It is primarily an internal state of mind, a deep and stable aspiration for liberation.
What is the full scope of what one determines to be free from?
All of cyclic existence, from the lowest hell realms to the highest god realms, including all pleasant and unpleasant experiences within it.
Why must the determination to be free include even the highest samsaric realms, such as formless realm god states, which are temporarily blissful?
Because these realms, though free from gross suffering, are still conditioned by karma, impermanent, subject to the pervasive duḥkha of conditioning, and do not offer true, lasting liberation from suffering.
Which type of duḥkha is most crucial to understand and turn away from for developing the most profound and stable determination to be free?
The pervasive duḥkha of conditioning, as it underlies all samsaric existence, even states of temporary pleasure or neutrality.