unit 10 Flashcards
what is Lewis force field analysis
force field analysis provides an overview of the balance between forces driving change in a business and the forces resisting change
explaining force field analysis
- there are forces driving change and
forces restraining it - where there is an equilibrium
between the two sets if forces there
will be no change - in order for change to occur the
driving force must exceed the
restraining
examples of forces driving change
internal:
- need for higher profits
- poor productivity
- need to change culture
- change of lordship
external:
- customer demand
- competition
- legislation & taxes
- political environment
- economic conditions
- ethics & social values
- technological change
why change is resisted
- self interest
- misunderstanding
- low tolerance of change
- different assessment of the situation
resistance to change
- a degree of resistance is normal since
change is:- disruptive
- stressful
- a degree of scepticism can be healthy
especially where there are weakness
win the proposed changes - however resistance will also slow the
achievement objectives
example of Lewis model change a primark
forces to change:
- competition
- technology
- capacity
forces resisting change:
- employees
- culture
- low margins
reasons to change: self interest
- self-interest is a powerful motivator
- raises from a perceived threat to job
security, status and financial position - individuals often place their own
interest ahead of those of their
organisation, particularly if they don’t
feel a strong loyalty to it
resistance to change: different assessment of the situation
- here there is disagreement about the
need for change or what that change
needs to be - some people may simply disagree
with the change proposed, or they
may feel they have a better solution - this is different from “self-interest”-
the resistance here is based on
disagreement about what is best for
the business
resistance to change; low tolerance & inertia
- many people suffer from inertia or
reluctance to change, preferring
things to stay “that way they are” - many people need security,
predictability & stability in their work - if there is low tolerance of change
(perhaps arising from past experience)
then resistance to change may grow
resistance to change: misinformation & misunderstanding
- people don’t understand why change
is needed, perhaps because they are
misinformed about the real strategic
position of the business - perception may be widespread that
there is no compelling reason for
change - perhaps even an element of people
fooling themselves that things are
better than they really are
Mnemonic for resistance to change
- S elf intrest
- A assessment is issues
- L ow
- T tolerance
- M misunderstanding
- M isinformation
overcoming resistance to change,
6 ways of overcoming resistance to change
- education & communication
- participation & innovation
- facilitation & support
- manipulation & co-operation
- negotiation & bargaining
- explicit & implicit coercion
overcoming resistance to change: manipulation & co-operation
- co-operation involves bringing
specific individuals into roles and
positions that are part of change
management (perhaps managers who
are likely to be otherwise resistant to
change) - manipulation involves the selective
use of information to encourage
people to behave in a particular way - may be deemed to be unethical but
perhaps only option if other methods
of overcoming resistance to change
prove ineffective
overcoming resistance to change: negotiation & bargaining
- the idea here is to give people who
resist an incentive to change - or leave - the negation and bargaining might
involve offering better financial
rewards for those who accept the
requirements of the change
programme - alternatively, enhanced rewards for
leaving might also be offered - this approach is commonly used when
a business needs to restructure the
organisation
overcoming resistance ti change: explicit & implicit coercion
- this approach is very much the “last
resort” if other methods of
overcoming resistance to change fail - explicit coercion involves people been
told exactly what the implications of
resisting change will be ie. job losses - implicit coercion involves suggesting
the likely negative consequences for
the business of failing to change,
without making explicit threats - the big issue with using coercion is
that it almost inevitably damages trust
between people I a business and can
lead to damaged morale (in the sort-
term)
tall structure
- may levels of hierarchy
- clear line of authority
- slow decision making
- beneficial in large organisations
- specialised roles necessary
flat structure
- fewer levels
- faster communication and decision
making - enhance collaboration and
adaptability - struggles with roles
matrix structure
employees from different departments help speed up projects as well as add creativity, common in IT industries
delayering
- removing layers of management
- streamline processes
- increased efficiency
- requires carful handling to ensure
that communication remains effective
decentralised
- distributes decision-making power -
throughout organisation - empower employees and improve
responsiveness to local needs - may lead to inconsistencies in
decision-making
what is critical path
method for organising activities associated with a particular process in order to find the most efficient way of completing a task
save time
network diagram
node to show the start and end
EST
LFT
what is a strategy
- crucial aspect of running a business
- defined plan of action that outlines
the direction a business wants to take
and defines how the plan will cascade
through the organisation by the
allocation of resources - sets the direction for the entire
organisation and helps to align all
employees towards a common goal - ‘serves as a road map for a firm,
guiding its octopus and decisions to
achieve its goals and stay competitive
in the marketplace’