Failures of LEM
Molecular Orbital Theory (MOT)
MOT: 1st Row Homonuclear Diatomics
Antibonding Node
Valance MO Correlation Diagram - 1s
MOT Bond Order
Molecular Orbital Electron Configuration
MOT: 2nd Row Homonuclear Diatomics - 2s
if antibonding:
- has a antibonding node (destructive interference)
MOT: 2nd Row Homonuclear Diatomics - 2pz
MOT: 2nd Row Homonuclear Diatomics - 2px
MOT: 2nd Row Homonuclear Diatomics - 2py
Valence MO Correlation Diagram - 2nd Row Homonuclear Diatomics: First Order (without atomic orbitals)
/σ2s < σ2s< σ2p < π2p < π2p < σ*2p
Valence MO Correlation Diagram - 2nd Row Homonuclear Diatomics: First Order (with atomic orbitals)
2s < σ2s < σ2s* < 2p < σ2p < π2p < π2p* < σ2p*
Valence MO Correlation Diagram - 2nd Row Homonuclear Diatomics: Second Order (without atomic orbitals)
σ2s<σ2s<π2p<σ2p<π2p<σ*2p
- applies to Li2 ->N2
Valence MO Correlation Diagram - 2nd Row Homonuclear Diatomics: Second Order (with atomic orbitals)
σ2s < σ2s< π2p < σ2p < π2p < σ*2p
- applies to B - N
Diamagnetic
molecule is repelled by a magnetic field, # of unpaired e-‘s = 0
Paramagnetic
molecule is attracted by a magnetic field, # of unpaired e-‘s > 0
LUMO
lowest unoccupied moleuclar orbital
HOMO
highest occupied molecular orbital
Full MO Configuration
why is antibonding higher in energy and why is bonding lower than a.o’s
Why Bonding MO’s Lower:
- Bonding MOs form by constructive interference of atomic orbitals (AO)
- When the phases match (same sign) between the two atoms along the bond:
- Electron density increases between the nuclei
- This attracts both nuclei toward the shared electron cloud
- Energy decreases → stabilizing
- therefore bonding MO’s energy is lower in energy
- sigma bonds are more stable
Why Antibonding MO’s Higher:
- Antibonding MOs form by destructive interference of atomic orbitals
- When the phases dont match (opposite signs) between the two atoms along the bond:
- A node forms between the nuclei
- electron density between nuclei decreases
- Nuclei repel each other because there’s no electron glue
- Energy increases → destabilizing
- because unstable , more energy
Valence MO Correlation Diagram - 2nd Row Heteronuclear Diatomics
MOT: 2nd Row Heteronuclear Diatomics
Combined LEM and MOT
Rules:
1. the σ and π systems are orthaganol (perpendicular)
2. LPs participiating in resonance are in the π system (delocalized) not the σ system
3. only LPs in the σ system (localized) contribute to the SN and participate in hybridization