Unit 2: Working Memory, Long Term Memory Flashcards

1
Q

What is the definition of STM in the modal model?

A

single component short-term store

functions:
temporary storage - lists, task relevant info
transfer to LTM via rehearsal

a single system for holding and manipulating information for a wide variety of tasks such as learning, comprehension, and reasoning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a dual task?

A
  1. encode list of digits
  2. perform a cognitive task (e.g., reasoning, comprehension)
  3. recall list of digits

if both load and task make use of same store, then increasing load (to span) should disrupt performance on primary task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the concurrent tasks grammatical reason with memory load study by Baddeley 1986?

A

memory span task - provides a memory load

grammatical reasoning task

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the procedure in the grammatical reason with memory load study by Baddeley 1986?

A

auditory presentation of digit load - 1 digit per second

concurrent overt rehearsal of load

visual presentation of letter pair & sentence

respond T/F to sentence

serial recall of digits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the design of the grammatical reason with memory load study by Baddeley 1986?

A

memory load: 0 to 8 digits

sentence type: true value X voice X affirmation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the implications of single-store view?

A

assumption:
span task - absorbs (almost) all STM capacity
reasoning task - requires access to STM

prediction:
if span task absorbs all of STM –> dual task requirements should produce a dramatic impairment in performance

span-length memory load –> catastrophic interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the results of dual task reasoning?

A

no effect on reasoning when load is light (0-2)

reason showed by load

error rate low regardless of load

load also has negative, but non-catastrophic, impact on free recall & text comprehension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the implication of dual task performance?

A

system responsible for digit span cannot be the same as system responsible for learning/reasoning

motivated the development of the multi-component WM model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Baddeley and Hitch’s (1983) model of working memory?

A

central executive: control center of working memory

two subordinate systems:
phonological loop: processes verbal/acoustic information
visuo-spatial sketch pad: processes visual and spatial information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the working memory interpretation of dual task performance?

A

load maintenance requires: access to phonological store, minor attentional resources to schedule rehearsal

grammatical reasoning requires: attentional resources for sentence understanding/reasoning, limited access to phonological store

as load increases, attentional demands increase; thus, less capacity available for sentence processing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the two components of the phonological loop?

A

phonological short-term store: phonological information that decays with time, “inner ear”

subvocal rehearsal process: articulatory-like rehearsal that needs active maintenance, “inner voice”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the speech-based system in the phonological loop?

A

phonological similarity decrease

irrelevant speech decrease

articulatory suppression decrease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the 2 second capacity in the phonological loop?

A

word length effect

cross-linguistic changes

developmental changes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the phonological similarity effect?

A

similar sounding list < dissimilar sounding lists

(almost) no evidence for semantic similarity effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the implication of the phonological similarity effect?

A

representation is speech-based not meaning based

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the irrelevant speech effect?

A

recall impaired when items are accompanied by other verbal material

effect found with: same-language words, same-language non-words, foreign words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the interpretation of the irrelevant speech effect?

A

unattended (linguistic) material was gaining access to the phonological store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is auditory suppression?

A

concurrent (overt or covert) articulation, decreases word span (“the, the, the…”; “one, two, three, one, two…)

concurrent articulation decreases: the phonological similarity effect, word length effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the interpretation of auditory suppression?

A

articulation of irrelevant items dominates ACP - words cannot be “rehearsed” or recorded into phonological code

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the word length effect?

A

word span decrease as number of syllables/word increases

recall depends of reading rate: number of words recalled ~2 (reading rate)

reading rate = number of words read per second

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the study of the capacity of the phonological store by Baddeley et al. (1975)?

A

task: free recall

materials: 5-word lists

manipulation: syllable length

22
Q

What are the results of the study of the capacity of the phonological store by Baddeley et al. (1975)?

A

recall decreased, as syllable length increased; recall predicted by reading rate

linear relation between reading time and recall

interpretation: capacity of phono loop is about 2 seconds of speech materials

reason: fast fading phono trace, rehearsal refreshes trace, if not rehearsed within 2 seconds, most info lost

23
Q

What are the implications of the study of the capacity of the phonological store by Baddeley et al. (1975)?

A

across languages, digit span should be related to mean syllable length of digits

digit span should increase with age, because speech rate does

24
Q

What are the cross-linguistic changes in digit span?

A

as predicted:
span larger for languages with short digits than long
span ~ 2 X reading rate

25
What are age related changes in digit span?
as predicted: span increases with age, span ~2 X speech rate overt or covert articulation serves to maintain items in the phonological store by refreshing their fading traces the faster it can run, the longer the memory span
26
How is the phonological loop implicated in learning to read?
children with impaired reading ability have reduced memory spans and have difficulties in tasks which require the manipulation of phonological information (e.g. given Stop, reply Top)
27
How is the phonological loop implicated in language comprehension?
STM patients some difficulty in comprehending verbose or complex sentences e.g., "The boys pick the apples" = OK "The two boys pick the green apples from the tree" = impaired
28
How is the phonological loop implicated in vocabulary acquistion?
there is a strong correlation between non-word repetition (which strongly taxes the phonological loop) and vocabulary size
29
What is the visuo-spatial sketchpad?
function: construction, maintained, and manipulation of mental images assumptions: independence of VSSP and phonological loop operations: mental rotation, mental scanning, boundary extension, dynamic memory supports: spatial problem solving (e.g., windows and couches), prediction of dynamic consequences
30
What is the mental rotation in the visuo-spatial sketchpad study by Shepard & Metzler (1971)?
materials: pairs of 3-D(ish) objects in a variety of orientations task: timed same/different judgment results: RT increases with angular disparity interpretation: mental rotation has characteristics that mimic physical rotation.. it is almost as if people are actually mentally turning the object about in their VSSP
31
What is the episodic buffer?
multimodal information is bound together in the episodic buffer this creates a (LTM) episodic memory trace working memory interacts with long-term memory: intended to account for with semantic effects on STM task
32
How is the influence of LTM on STM task a problem with the model of working memory?
chunking proactive interference and release from proactive interference semantic similarity can increase span span: high frequency words > low frequency words
33
What are the problems with the phonological loop?
under suppression: span > 0 for visually presented words
34
Why were alternative perspectives on working memory created?
problems with Baddeley's Model a need to better understand executive functioning predictive power of span task
35
What are the three related issues with the alternative perspectives on working memory created?
reading/operation span as a measure of "capacity" WM contents as the active portion of LTM WM as executive attention
36
What is the process of measuring working memory capacity?
key idea: performance on complex cognitive task reflects a number of different capacities retrieval efficiency, processing efficiency, "attention-free" capacity of relevant slave system, attentional management (ability to focus on relevant info & irrelevant info) WM span tasks developed to measure relation between WM and performance on complex cognitive tasks
37
What is the WM memory span?
WM span = number of words recalled demonstrates capacity for holding load while processing large individual differences in WM span (2-6 items) WM span measured predict performance on IQ, achievement tests (e.g., SATs), and g digit/word span uncorrelated with IQ/SAT tests
38
What is Cowan's embedded processes model?
central executive: directs and controls voluntary processing encoding: incoming info activities representation in LTM
39
What is the central notion of Cowan's embedded processes model?
LTM in one of 3 states: 1. Dormant 2. Activated: fades (decays) unless reactivated 3. "in focus" (of attention): limited to 4 items
40
What are the two components of the span from activation perspective?
read-out from focus activated material, retrieved before decay
41
What are the predictions of the span from activation perspective?
factors increase LTM, increase span concreteness: concrete > abstract word frequency: high frequency > low frequency span > 0 when rehearsal suppressed
42
What is domain specific capacity?
efficient processing of immediate task, leaves additional resources for maintaining load accounts for dual-task
43
What is domain general capacity?
general ability to "control attention to maintain information in an active quickly retrievable state"
44
What is the main idea of span as executive control?
active, irrelevant info infers with performance people differ in their ability to inhibited irrelevant info or remain focused on relevant info
45
What is the prediction of span as executive control?
individual differences in reading/operation span predict performance on tasks that require executive control
46
What is the span and proactive interference task?
participants: high-span or low-span materials and procedure: 3 10-word lists (words from same category), 2 s/word, 16 s delay, 20 s recall periods results: proactive interference worse for low-span
47
What is the span and anti-saccade task?
task: move eyes away from cue to find target measures: distractibility main finding: low span worse (more distractible) than high-span
48
What is the relationship between span and the Stroop task?
Stroop task - name color of font general finding: incongruent trials slower than congruent trials interpretation: response slowed because attention required to inhibit color name
49
What is the experiment on span and the Stroop task?
participants: low span vs high SP congruence: 0%, 50%, 75%, difficulty increases with congruence results: difficulty increases with congruence, low-span worse than high-span, effect increase with congruence interpretation: inhibitory capacity particularly important when task is difficult
50
What was the conclusion regarding the alternatives to Baddeley's view?
contents of WM: active portion of LTM differences in capacity: reflects individual differences in ability to remain focused and inhibit irrelevant info reflected in LTM and task perceptual tasks
51
What are the conclusions about working memory discussed in lecture?
no pure measure of STM: contents are focal info and activated LTM covert rehearsal: one way of keeping info active functional importance: WM provides ability to access and maintain info in active state required for thought, language, problem solving, etc.; and to inhibit related/available, but potentially distracting info