Voting behaviour Flashcards
Define expressive voting
voting on the basis of party attachment, political ideology, or social group membership
Define strategic voting
- voting to produce an election outcome which is as close as possible to ones policy preferences
What is a political cleavage
a division in society which produces alignment between a group of voters and a party
Define Dealignment
the erosion of political cleavages, and their replacement with individualistic voting
Clevage system- What is the historical divisions hypothesis
(Lipset & Rokken 1967) Mobilization is fixed at the time of suffrage extension. Cleavages
that existed at that time largely persist to today
Clevage system- What is strategic mobilisation thesis
(Posner 2001; Laitin 1986) some cleavages are more electorally pivotal than other. Small religious or ethnic minorities are rarely mobilized
Clevage system- What is Cultural dissimilarity hypothese
(Duning & Harrison 2010) cultural similarity determine likelihood of mobilization
Case study- A Natural Experiment: The Chewas and Tumbukus in Central Africa
Posner 2004
- looked at the voting behaviour in Malawi (where Chewas & Tumbukus are a dominant ethnic group) and Zambia (where Chewas & Tumbukus are not a dominant ethnic group)
- found that in Malawi people would argue they would not vote for another candidate or marry from another ethnic group whereas in Zambia they did not care
- this is because politicians in Zambia mobilise voters regionally and not ethnically (way more ethnic groups)
- supports strategic mobilisation thesis
What is the Alford Index (1962)
- measures class voting by
- % of working-class vote who vote for left wing
minus
% of non-working-class who voted for a left wing party
What are the 4 causes for dealignment?
1 - Economic growth + prosperity provides the WC with economic security thus no longer the primary goal for these voters
2 - Expansion of public sector - growth to 40-50% of GDP in the public sector which leads to new social groups and interests
3 -Expansion of higher education - leads to growing social mobility which leads to new cognitive thinking
4 - Mass Media - replacement of partisan party controlled media
Case study- class voting in the US
Avi Feller and Andrew Gelman 2012
- typically democrats usually promote policies that advocate for the poor and Republicans promote policies in favour of the rich
- However we see that poorer states predominantly vote Republican and vice-versa
- But this is reversed at the individual level
- Rich people still vote Republican which suggests that class matters more in poorer states as it is rich voters in poor states that are increasingly more likely to vote consistently Republican
- Because class issues still matter for poor voters whilst post-modern backlash (social issues) is the main concern for Republican voters
- So class voting is declining amongst rich voters whilst social issues are becoming more prevalent
Case study- UK class voting
Cutts et al (2020) identify about class voting in the UK
- a huge drop of labour votes from working class area, and whilst this class divide still persists there is still a divide
* these divides are still dominated by age, race and ethnicity
What does Norris & Inglehart (2016) find about why people support populist parties
- cultural factors are the most significant explanation for why people vote for populist parties
- a rise in tolerance for diverse identities, sexualities, abortions and feminism has created a negative effect on the older sector of the selectorate - created a counter-revolutionary retro backlash
- this silent revolution to restore traditional norms and values makes them appeal to populist groups
The spatial model of politics
- Voters have “preferences” about a range of policies
- These preferences are “single-peaked” => each voter has an “ideal point” in a single-or
multi-dimensional policy space - expressive and strategic voting
Why do people vote strategically?
Local elections - To influence the election outcome in a constituency
of the candidate a person most prefers has no chance of being elected, then vote
for the “closest” candidate from amongst the candidates who have a reasonable
chance of being elected
National elections - To influence government formation and policy outcomes
of the party a person most prefers has no chance of influencing government
formation or might form a coalition with a party which is further away from a
person’s preference, then vote for a party which is “further” away, but which will
lead to a policy outcome closer to a person’s ideal policy