Week 9 - Social Categorization + Stereotypes Flashcards
(20 cards)
What are Stereotypes?
What someone believes about another persons attributes (ie: personality traits) that define a group.
“Pictures in our heads” – Lippmann, 1992
Stereotypes are often ambivalent: positive and negative
Stereotype Activation
There are networks of associations
Stereotype can come to mind automatically without intention or conscious effort.
Are Stereotype accurate?
Yes and No
They can contain some truth but are usually oversimplified, context-dependent and often misleading
Social Categorization
We divide the world into groups of people based on common attributes (ie: gender, politics, schools, etc)
Social Categorization – Why do we categorize?
Categories help us to efficiently and effectively navigate the world.
Social categorization is at the heart of stereotyping.
Epistemic function:
- All categories: Transform the world from chaotic complexity into predictable order
- Social categories: Infer goals, intentions, skills, knowledge, traits, predict expected behaviors
Identity function:
- Social Categorization Theory:
- Social Identity Theory:
Social Categorization – Social Categorization Theory
Cognitive aspects of grouping people based on shared characteristics
- Categorizing others involves self-categorization and considering our status vis-à-vis the target
Social Categorization – Social Identity Theory
Emotional and identity related consequences of group memberships
- Connection/belonging vs. alienation/distancing
- Meaning and a positive, distinct self-concept
Automaticity of Social Categorization
- We group people by categories like race or gender to make sense of information.
- When overwhelmed (too much to remember), we rely on those categories to recall “who said what.”
- This leads to systematic errors (e.g., confusing two people of the same race), revealing that social categories shape our thinking without conscious intent.
What leads to Stereotyping?
Biased Perceptions of others lead to Stereotyping!
Two key effects:
-
Intraclass/Interclass Effect:
* We overestimate differences between different groups
* We underestimate differences within groups
we do this because it gives us a sense of clarity and order -
Out-group Homogeneity Effect:
* We see out-groups as more similar (“they all look the same”)
* We see our in-group as more diverse
This leads to stereotyping and biased judgments, especially with less out-group contact
Both effects show how categorization distorts our perception and leads to stereotyping
The Minimal Group Paradigm
The Minimal Group Paradigm determined that people favor their in-group, even when the formation of groups is arbitrary (ie: groups were formed via flipping a coin and have never met in-person)
What drives in-group favoritism?
- Positive Distinctiveness: people want their group to feel superior.
Tajfel, 1970s
Stereotype Content
Stereotype’s attach specific traits to groups that reflect cultural beliefs (not facts)
- Thus, stereotypes vary from group to group (ie: Americans and Germans stereotype “dominant Male roles” differently)
How is Stereotype Content Learned?
Age Development:
- 12 months: babies recognize gender categories
- 3-6 years: kids develop stereotypes across categories (gender, race, age)
Learning Mechanisms:
-
Perception: what we see — skin, height, voices, jobs, etc.
Social learning: labels used by society, parents, implicit cues, media, and friends
Salience and Content
Salience: People notice “rare” things more (ie: a minority member doing something negative), and then overestimate how often that happens
- this leads to Illusory Correlations: false associations between group and behavior
Stereotypes can develop without objective reasons or from having learned them from others.
Stereotype content is learned…
Early and automatically from what we see and hear — even when it’s not accurate or statistically justified.
Stereotype Content Model
Stereotypes vary along two key dimensions:
- Warmth (friendly vs. cold)
- Competence (capable vs. incompetent)
What predicts warmth & competence?
(Stereotype Content Model)
Competition and Status predict Warmth and Competence
Predictors:
- Competition –> Do they intend to help or hurt you? (Warmth)
- Status –> Are they capable of carry out intentions? (Competence)
Stereotypes + Emotions = Prejudice
Implicit Associations Test
Reaction time task measuring strengths of associations
Gender-Equality Paradox
More egalitarian and developed countries: Greater occupational gender segregation
Gender Stereotypes from Language
Listening to and producing language could lead to the formation of
cultural stereotypes.
Gender encoded in language:
- Titles: Mr., Miss, Mrs
- Names: Sam, Ashley
- Pronouns: He, she, they, etc.
- Job titles: Waiter, waitress
- Contexts: Gendered associations
- Grammatical gender systems: Enfermera;
enfermero (nurse)