Chapter 17 Flashcards
(62 cards)
The Nature of Leadership
The Meaning of Leadership
Power and Leadership
Using Power
The Meaning of Leadership
Process: what leaders actually do.
Property: who leaders are.
Leaders
Process: what leaders actually do.
Using noncoercive influence to shape the group’s or organization’s goals.
Helping to define organizational culture.
Property: who leaders are.
The set of characteristics attributed to individuals perceived to be leaders.
Leaders
People who can influence the behaviors of others without having to rely on force.
People who are accepted as leaders by others.
Power and Leadership
Power is the ability to affect the behavior of others. Legitimate power Reward power Coercive power Referent power Expert power
Legitimate power
Granted through the organizational
hierarchy.
Reward power
The power to give or withhold rewards, such as salary increases, bonuses, promotions, praise, recognition, and interesting job assignments.
Coercive power
Is the capability to force compliance by means of psychological, emotional, or physical threat.
Referent power
The personal power that accrues to someone based on identification, imitation, loyalty, or charisma.
Expert power
Is derived from the possession of information or expertise.
Using Power
Legitimate request Instrumental compliance Coercion Rational persuasion Personal identification Inspirational appeal Information distortion
Legitimate request
Compliance by a subordinate with a manager’s request because the organization has given the manager the right to make the request.
Instrumental compliance
Subordinate complies to get the reward the manager controls.
Coercion
Threatening to fire, punish, or reprimand subordinates if they do not do something.
Rational persuasion
Convincing subordinates that compliance is in their own best interest.
Personal identification
Using the referent power of a superior’s desired behaviors to shape the behavior of a subordinate.
Information distortion
Withholding or distorting information (which may create an unethical situation) to influence subordinates’ behavior.
Traits Approach to Leadership
Assumed that a basic set of personal traits that differentiated leaders from nonleaders could be used to identify leaders and as a tool for predicting who would become leaders.
The trait approach was unsuccessful in establishing empirical relationships between traits and persons regarded
as leaders.
Hundreds of studies boil down to five common traits…
Leadership Behaviors
Michigan Studies (Rensis Likert) Ohio State Studies
Michigan Studies (Rensis Likert)
Job-centered behavior
Employee-centered behavior
These two forms of leader behaviors were considered to be at opposite ends of the same continuum and similar to (respectively) Likert’s System 1 and System 4 of organizational design.
Job-centered behavior
Managers who pay close attention to
subordinates’ work, explain work procedures, and are keenly interested in performance.
Employee-centered behavior
The behavior of leaders who develop cohesive work groups and ensure employee satisfaction.
Ohio State Studies
The studies did not interpret leader behavior as being one dimensional as did the Michigan studies.
Identified two basic leadership styles that can be exhibited simultaneously:
• Initiating-structure behavior
• Consideration behavior