Chapter 4 Flashcards

(55 cards)

1
Q

is a science that investigates the nature of human conduct.

A

Ethics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

we must differentiate between the _________ and the ____________.

A

human act
act of man

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The distinction between these two is an important process
in determining the _________________

A

morality of man’s actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The Nature of Human Act

A

Human acts
Act of man

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Flow of Human Act

A

Knowledge -> Consent -> Action -> Responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

are actions that proceed from the deliberate free will of man.

A

Human acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

These actions are therefore done with knowledge and consent and willfully carried out by the person.

A

Human acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Human acts are characterized as;

A
  1. The free and voluntary acts of man;
  2. Acts dine with knowledge and consent;
  3. Acts that are proper to man as a rational being since man has been gifted with nationality and freedom of will;
  4. Acts which are conscious and under our control and for which we are responsible.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  1. The __________ and _________ acts of man
A

free
voluntary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  1. Acts dine with __________ and ____________;
A

knowledge
consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  1. Acts that are proper to man as a ______________ since man has been gifted with __________ and ______________;
A

rational being
nationality
freedom of will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  1. Acts which are __________and _____________ and for which we are __________.
A

conscious
under our control
responsible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

refers to certain types of actions that are naturally exhibited by man as such they are morally indifferent because we cannot judge them to be either ethical or unethical.

A

Act of man

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

are therefore natural acts that we perform by virtue of our nature as animal beings.

A

Acts of man

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

There are two categories of acts of man;

A
  1. Natural involuntary actions.
  2. Natural voluntary actions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

These are actions of man that are performed involuntarily (e.g. blinking of the eyes, perspiration, beating of the heart).

A

Natural involuntary actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

These are actions that are within the control of man’s will but only for some period of time (e.g. breathing, sleeping, eating and walking).

A

Natural voluntary actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Human Acts in Relation to Reason

A

a. Good acts
b. Evil acts
c. Indifferent acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

are those done by man in harmony with the dictates of right reason.

A

Good acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

are those actions done by man in contradiction to the dictates of right reason

A

Evil acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

are those acts that are neither good nor evil

A

Indifferent acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

The Voluntariness of the Human Acts

A

a. Perfect Voluntariness actions
b. Imperfect voluntariness actions
c. Direct voluntary actions
d. Indirect voluntary actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

only voluntary acts have a ______________.

A

moral bearing.

23
Q

are performed with full knowledge and with full consent.

A

Perfect Voluntariness actions

24
Example: A person donating a large sum of money to charity after careful thought and without any external pressure. They fully understand the impact of their donation and willingly choose to help.
Perfect Voluntariness actions
25
that occur when there is no perfect knowledge or consent, or when either or both of the knowledge or consent is partial.
Imperfect voluntariness actions
26
Example: A teenager signing a contract without fully understanding the legal consequences. They may not have complete knowledge of what they are agreeing to, making their consent imperfect.
Imperfect voluntariness actions
27
that are intended for its own sake, either as a means or as an end.
Direct voluntary actions
28
Example: A student studying hard for an exam to get a high grade. The action (studying) is intentionally done as a means to achieve the goal (high grade).
Direct voluntary actions
29
that are not intended for its own sake but which merely follows as a regrettable consequence of an action.
Indirect voluntary actions
30
Example: A firefighter breaking a window to rescue a trapped person. The primary intention is to save the person, but breaking the window is an unintended but necessary consequence.
Indirect voluntary actions
31
The Moral Principle Involved in Actions Having Two Effects (The Indirect Voluntary Act)
1. The action must be morally good in itself, or at least morally indifferent. 2. The good effect of the act must precede the evil effect. The evil effect is morally allowed to happen as regrettable consequences. 3. There must be a grave or sufficient reason for doing the act. 4. The evil effect should not outweigh the good effect or, at least, the good effect should be equivalent in importance to the evil effect.
32
The factors that link human acts with their norms are called
determinants or morality
33
serve as the measure of the goodness and the evilness of the human act
the determinants of morality
34
The following are the 3 determinants of morality;
1. The End of the Action. 2. The End of the Actor. 3. Circumstances of the Act.
35
this refers to the intrinsic nature or purpose of the action itself—whether the action is morally good, bad, or neutral. Some actions are inherently good (e.g., helping others), while others are inherently bad (e.g., stealing).
The End of the Action.
36
Example: * ___________ Telling the truth in a court case to ensure justice. * ___________ Lying under oath, which is inherently wrong because it promotes injustice.
Good Action: Bad Action:
37
This refers to the intention of the motive of the person performing act. This is to be distinguished from the end of the action. Even if an action is good in itself, the moral value can change based on the intent behind it. A good action done for a bad reason may not be truly moral. he motive of the agent varies in different individuals, while the end of the act is always the same
The End of the Actor.
38
Example: * ___________A doctor treating a patient to save their life. * ___________ A person donating money to charity only to gain social recognition, rather than to help others.
* Good Intention * Bad Intention:
39
Refer to the conditions that affect the human act by increasing or decreasing the responsibility of the actor. refer to the external factors that can increase or decrease the moral value of an action, such as the ____, _______, ________, or ________ involved. These do not change whether an act is good or bad but may affect the degree of responsibility.
Circumstances of the Act time place method people
40
Example: _____________: A person giving food to the poor during a famine, where help is urgently needed. _____________: A student cheating in an entrance exam, where the dishonesty directly affects their future and the fairness of the admission process.
Good Circumstance Bad Circumstance
41
The following are considered the circumstances of the act because they can aggregate or mitigate the culpability of the actor;
a. Who b. What c. Where d. How e. When f. Why
42
refers to the person or the one to whom the act is ascribed.
Who
43
refers to the quality or the quantity of the object of the act
What
44
refers to the place where the act is performed.
Where
45
refers to the manner or mode by which the act is performed
How
46
refers to the circumstances of the time.
When
47
refers to the circumstances of the end or intention of the act.
Why
48
writes 5 principles involving the implication of the circumstances of the act;
Paul Glenn
49
The Principles Involved in the Circumstances of the Action
1. An indifferent act can become good or evil through circumstances. 2. A good act can become evil through circumstances. 3. An intrinsically good act can become better or an intrinsically evil act can become worse through circumstances 4. An evil act can never become good through circumstance. 5. A good act done with evil means destroys the entire objective goodness of the act.
50
Example: * Good: Walking in a park for relaxation is neutral, but if done to accompany an elderly person for their safety, it becomes good. * Evil: A person eating food is neutral, but if they eat all the food while knowing their starving sibling has nothing to eat, it becomes morally wrong.
An indifferent act can become good or evil through circumstances.
51
Example: * Helping a friend financially is good, but if the money is knowingly given to support their gambling addiction, the act becomes morally wrong.
A good act can become evil through circumstances.
52
Example: * Better: Donating money to charity is good, but donating anonymously and without expecting recognition makes it even better. * Worse: Lying is intrinsically bad, but lying in court under oath to frame an innocent person makes it much worse.
An intrinsically good act can become better or an intrinsically evil act can become worse through circumstances
53
Example: * Stealing money from a wealthy person to help the poor is still stealing and remains morally wrong, even if the intention seems good.
An evil act can never become good through circumstance
54
Example: * A student getting high grades is a good outcome, but if they achieve it by cheating on exams, the act becomes entirely wrong.
A good act done with evil means destroys the entire objective goodness of the act