classic study: Baddeley 1966b Flashcards

(32 cards)

1
Q

What was the aim of Baddeley’s study?

A

To investigate whether long term memory encodes semantically or acoustically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the sample?

A

75 young servicemen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did the participants go through before the procedure?

A

a hearing test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How many pp’s were excluded before the procedure?

A

3
(72 pp’s left)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What kind of experiment was it?

A

Lab exp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What experimental design was used?

A

independent groups design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How many conditions were there?

A

4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the independent variable?

A

the type of similarity between words in a list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the dependent variable?

A

score on word 10 word recall test in correct order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How many words were there in each word list?

A

10 words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was list A?

A

Acoustically similar words (sound similar)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was list B?

A

Acoustically dissimilar words (sound different)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was list C?

A

semantically similar words (similar meanings)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was list D?

A

semantically dissimilar words (different meanings)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How many participants were in condition A?

A

18

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How many participants were in condition B?

17
Q

How many participants were in condition C+D?

18
Q

What happened during the learning trials?

A

Pp’s presented aloud on tape 1 word for 3 secs with 40 secs to write down (in order) as many words they heard- this was carried out 4 times

19
Q

How long was the interval task and what was it?

A

20 mins of recalling sequences of 8 digits

20
Q

What happened after the interval task?

A

participants were unexpectedly asks to recall the words in the correct order without revision

21
Q

What were the results of the semantically similar words?

A

recall was poor, indicating similar meanings interfered with memory

22
Q

What were the results of acoustically similar words?

A

no significant impact on recall suggesting that LTM does not rely on sound

23
Q

What was the conclusion about the procedure?

A

it was not a true test of LTM which was being influenced by material stored in STM

24
Q

What was the conclusion about LTM?

A

LTM primarily encoded semantically, as words with similar meaning caused semantic confusion

25
What were the 3 main weaknesses of generalisability? (G.r.a.v.e)
1. All servicemen 2. Androcentric- all men (can't be applied to women) 3. All from army-related experiences (done some services)
26
How was the procedure standardised? (g.R.a.v.e)
All pp's were shown words for the same duration (3s) and same amount of words (10 words)
27
What could be a weakness in the reliability? (g.R.a.v.e)
individual factors such as concentration and motivation could affect recall
28
How can the results be useful in education and revision? (g.r.A.v.e)
Emphasises the importance of meaning-based learning
29
How can the results be useful in improving long term recall? (g.r.A.v.e)
encoding in LTM is mostly semantic and can help to improve Long Term recall of info
30
How does the study have high internal validity? (g.r.a.V.e)
controlled setting eliminated the extraneous variables
31
How did the study have low ecological validity? (g.r.a.V.e)
Artificial task
32
Were there any ethical issues? (g.r.a.v.E)
no