Criminal: Topic Two Flashcards

(40 cards)

1
Q

What is topic 2?

A

The collection and processing of forensic evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the key research for topic 2?

A

Hall and Player: Will the introduction of an emotional context affect fingerprint analysis and decision making

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did H and P’s sample consist of?

A

70 volunteer fingerprint experts working for the MET police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What were the volunteers provided with to analyse?

A

A fingerprint which was inked (from a volunteer) and superimposed onto a £50

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How many prints were used and how did this improve reliability?

A

14 were used and were checked for consistency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What equipment were P’s given?

A

1 of the 14 prints, fingerprint form (of suspect’s prints), CS report, fingerprint magnifying glass and a Russell comparator

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

When did P’s take part in the study?

A

In their normal working day

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Where did P’s conduct the analysis and what restrictions were imposed on P’s?

A

In a typical analysis room with no time limit, however, no discussion was permitted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the high emotional context?

A

Murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the low emotional context?

A

Forgery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were P’s asked to fill out before coming to a conclusion about the mark?

A

Their demographic info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What were the 4 categories of classification for the fingerprints?

A

1) Identification, 2) Not an identification, 3) Insufficient or 4) Insufficient detail to establish identity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

P’s were given a questionnaire which asked what? (Hall and Player)

A

Whether or not they referred to the CS infor and whether the impacted their analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How many out of the 70 said they read the report and how many of those were from the HEC?

A

57/70 read the report, 30 of those were from HEC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What percentage of the 30 HEC that read the report said that it influenced their decision?

A

52%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What percentage of the LEC that read the report said that it had influenced their decision?

A

6%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Despite what the experts reported about the influence of the report, what was found?

A

No significant results were found from their final opinion on the mark

18
Q

What did H and P conclude from the key research?

A

That emotional context did no detract from the experts’ capacity to make a final decision on the print

19
Q

What did Dror look into?

A

Top down biases

20
Q

What is the bottom up approach?

A

Examining the ridges and patterns of a fingerprint to identify unique features of a person

21
Q

When might experts use the top down approach?

A

If the print isn’t clear or complete

22
Q

What is the top down approach?

A

This is when contextual effects such as type of crime or suspect are used to help with the analysis of prints

23
Q

Give examples of biases which might impact fingerprint analysis

A

Expectancy bias, selective attention, conformity, need-determination perception, over confidence

24
Q

What did Dror et al (2005) look into?

A

Research with 27 students and emotional context

25
What did Dror do?
Manipulated P's emotions
26
Who were the P's in Dror's study?
27 students (non fingerprint experts)
27
How many pairs of prints were P's given? (Dror)
96
28
What were shown on a screen while the students analysed the prints?
Subliminal messages saying 'same' or 'guilty'
29
What did Dror found in terms of the high emotional cases?
That P's were more likely to match the pairs (58%)
30
What percentage of low emotional cases found a match?
58%
31
What percentage found a match for the HEC with the subliminal messages?
66%
32
What did Dror conclude from this research?
That emotional context does influence analysis for non fingerprint experts
33
What did Miller look into/propose?
The 'six pack' idea
34
What is the 'six pack' idea?
That we should use the same line-up technique with fillers for hair samples and fingerprint analysis as well as for visual identification
35
What is the main purpose of the 'six pack' idea?
To produce less false positives
36
What did Miller give to the students?
Either 1 hair sample from 1 suspect or 5 hair samples from 5 suspects
37
What did Kassin suggest?
A 'linear approach'
38
What did Kassin suggest in order to reduce bias in examiners?
That they should be unaware of the CSI and should examine the print context free without seeing the fingerprint of the suspect
39
What is ACE-V?
A scientific method for the examination of fingerprints for more structure and objectivity
40
What does ACE-V stand for?
Analysis, comparison, evaluation and verification