Environmental: Topic Five Flashcards

1
Q

What is topic five?

A

Psychological effects of the build environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What did Ulrich research?

A

Whether the view through a window may influence recovery from surgery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was Ulrich’s aim?

A

To find out if the view from a hospital window would affect a patients recovery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the sample used in Ulrich’s research

A

46 patients, all of whom had undergone gall bladder surgery, aged 20-69 with no complications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Where was the hospital?

A

Suburban pennsylvania

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the composition of Ulrich’s sample

A

23 matched pairs (15 female and 8 male)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

From when and where were the records obtained from?

A

From 1972 and 1981 with assigned rooms on the 2nd and 3rd floor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the hospital rooms

A

All rooms were double occupancy and nearly identical with the only difference being the view from the window

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When in the year had the patients undergone the cholecystectomy?

A

Between 1st May and 20th September

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Under what criteria were the p’s matched?

A

Sex, Age (within 5 years), smoker/non-smoker, weight, nature of hospitalisation, year of surgery and colour of room

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who gathered the information from the records?

A

Nurses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What information was gathered from the records?

A

Length of hospitalisation, number and strength of analgesics each day, number and strength of dosage, minor complications and nurses notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How did the length of hospitalisation differ from wall view patients to tree view patients?

A

Tree view spent significantly less time in hospital (7.96 days vs 8.7 days)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How did intake of analgesics differ from the patients?

A

Tree view took significantly less than wall view

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the results in terms of positive and negative nurse notes for both patients

A

3.96 negative notes vs 1.13 negative notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In what aspect was there no significant difference between the groups of patients?

A

No significance between consumption of anti anxiety drugs or minor post operative complications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What did Cohen look into?

A

Noise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What did Cohen aim to investigate?

A

The effects of noise on reading ability

19
Q

Describe the sample used by Cohen

A

54 children (2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th grade)

20
Q

Outline the differing sound conditions on the different apartment floors

A

55dBs on 32nd floor

66dBs on 8th floor

21
Q

Where were the apartment blocks in Cohen’s study?

22
Q

What did Cohen correlate the noise level readings with?

A

MAT results (metropolitan achievement tests)

23
Q

What did Cohen test?

A

Auditory discrimination

24
Q

Which words did Cohen test for auditory discrimination?

A

Gear and beer

25
For how many children who had lived in the apartments for more than 4 years what was the correlation found?
There was a significant correlation between floor level and auditory discrimination
26
What other significant correlations were found in Cohen's study?
Word knowledge, reading comprehension and reading total
27
What did White look into?
Green spaces
28
From how many people and when did White collect information?
From 10,000 people between 1991-2008
29
What did White ask P's about?
Mental health, living condition, location and many more variables
30
What did White find?
That those living in greener areas reported less mental distress and higher life satisfaction
31
What do White's findings mean?
That our well being can be affected by the type of area we live in
32
Newman and Pruitt Igoe demonstrates the idea of what?
Defensible space
33
When and where was the Pruitt Igoe project built?
St Louis, Missouri in 1954
34
How many people was the Pruitt Igoe supposed to house and what was it's aim?
12,000 people with an aim to provide space and security
35
What did the Pruitt Igoe have that made it more safe?
It supposedly had many features that made it immune to crime
36
When was the Pruitt Igoe demolished?
1972
37
Why was the Pruitt Igoe demolished?
Because it had failed
38
Which areas became 'havens for crime' and why?
The communal areas because the residents did not feel like they owned the space and therefore they became littered and damaged
39
Describe the idea of 'defensible space'
That we take care of and defend space which we feel like we have ownership of
40
What did Armitage look into?
Cul-de-sacs and footpaths
41
What was Armitage's research question?
Does road layout have an impact on crime and therefore residents well being
42
People living on what type of road experience less crime and why?
Cul-de-sacs experience less crime as it isn't as easy for burglars to get away
43
What must cul-de-sacs not have to ensure safety?
'Leaky' footpaths
44
Under what circumstances are footpaths okay to be included?
If they are short, direct, wide, overlooked, well lit and not running alongside properties