Criminal: Topic Four Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

What is topic four?

A

Psychology and the courtroom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the key research for this topic?

A

Dixon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Dixon look into?

A

The role of accent and context in perceptions of guilt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What research method did Dixon use?

A

Lab experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was Dixon’s aim?

A

To test the hypothesis that a Brummie accent suspect would receive a higher rating of guilt than a suspect with a standard accent and also whether race or type of crime would make a difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Describe the sample in Dixon’s study

A

119 white undergrad students who participated due to course requirements (University College Worcester)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How long was the recorded conversation that the P’s had to listen to? (Dixon)

A

2 minutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the conversation based on? (Dixon)

A

A transcript of an interview in Birmingham Police Station

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the suspect (Dixon)

A

A student in his 20s who spoke both accents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the example used of a blue collar crime?

A

Armed robbery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the example used of a white collar crime?

A

Cheque fraud

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did P’s have to do after listening to the tape? (Dixon)

A

Complete a rating scale on a 7 point scale from innocent to guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What significant effect was found? (Dixon)

A

The suspects accent to the attribution of guilt by the P’s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which accent was rated higher in guilt? (Dixon)

A

Brumie

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What 3 way interaction was found?

A

Accent, race and crime type

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which combination of factors created the most guilty suspect?

A

Brummie, black and blue collar crime

17
Q

What did Penrod and Cutler look into?

A

Witness confidence

18
Q

What resource did P’s have to analyse? (P&C)

A

A videotaped mock trial

19
Q

What was the IV? (P&C)

A

Whether the key female witness stated that she was 80% or 100% confident with what she had seen

20
Q

When the witness was 100% confident, what percentage of the jury found D guilty? (P&C)

21
Q

When the witness was 80% confident, what percentage of the jury found D guilty? (P&C)

22
Q

What did Castellow look into?

A

Attractiveness

23
Q

What were mock jurors asked to read? (Castellow)

A

A trial summary

24
Q

Describe the trial summary given to P’s (Castellow)

A

A 23 year old secretary was accusing her male employer of sexual harrassment

25
What were the mock jurors shown to help them to decide whether D was guilty? (Castellow)
Photos of the claimant and the defendant
26
What did Castellow find?
That when D was less attractive than V then he would more likely be found guilty than an attractive D
27
What did Pennington and Hastie look into?
Story order
28
What hypothesis were P and H testing?
That jurors are more easily persuaded by 'story order' than 'witness order'
29
What is story order? (P and H)
Presenting evidence in the sequence that events occurred
30
What is witness order? (P and H)
Presenting witnesses in the order most likely to persuade a jury
31
What did P and H find?
That story order was shown to be more persuasive than witness in prosecuting defendants
32
What did Broeder look into?
Inadmissible evidence
33
What was Broeder's aim?
To examine the effect of information being ruled inadmissible by a judge
34
What was Broeder's main question?
Is it possible that for at least some jury members, being told to disregard info makes it even more important?
35
What was the scenario given to people at the university of Chicago? (Broeder)
The case of a woman who was injured by a careless male driver
36
What were the results from Broeder?
Insurance - $37,000 No Insurance - $33,000 Disregard no insurance - $46,000