Definitions Flashcards

1
Q

Method of posing questions to people with the goal of understanding relationship between variables.

A

Survey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Asking two questions in one.

“Do you like pizza and agree that tacos should always have cheese?”

A

Double-Barreled Questions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A question which offers alternatives that the responder must choose from.

“Of the following, which best describes your relationship with pizza?”

A

Close-Ended

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A question to which the responder provides their own answer.

“What is your opinion on coffee?”

A

Open-Ended

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A rating scale which uses numeric rating with words, most commonly 5 points to choose from.
Ex. Strongly Agee (1) - Strongly disagree (7)

A

Likert Rating Scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A scale which you can select anywhere along the line.

“Studying is: Enjoyable - - - - - - - - I - Not Enjoyable”

A

Graphic Rating Scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A scale which incorporates the question and answer into one.

“The effects of smoking are: Harmless (1), Okay (2), Annoying (3), Horrible (4), Deadly (5)”

A

Semantic Differential Scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A scale which uses images instead of words.

“Which of the following faces best represents your mood?”

A

Non-verbal scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A shortcut used on long surveys where people are answering in a specific manner instead of responding to the actual content.

A

Response Set

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A response set in which respondents play it safe by answering in the middle of the scale.

A

Fence-sitting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A response set in which people answer ‘yes’ or ‘agree’ to everything.

A

Yea-Saying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A response set in which people answer according to what they believe is the socially acceptable answer.

A

Faking Good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A construct validity threat in which observers expectations influence their interpretation of participants behaviour or the overall outcome of a study.

A

Observer bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A construct validity threat in which participants conform to observer expectations.

A

Observer effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A research design in which observers are unaware of the conditions to which participants have been assigned or what the study is about

A

Masked Research Design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A construct validity threat in which participants behaviour changes due to the presence of an observer

A

Reactivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

An association between two variables

A

Correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

The strength of an association

A

Effect Size

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How likely it is that a correlation is not due to chance

A

Statistical Significance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

A value which helps evaluate the probability of whether a sample’s association came from a population in which the association is zero

A

p Value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Extreme scores which stand out from the rest and can pull results towards them

A

Outliers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Lack of variability in responses, not a full enough range of scores on a particular variable

A

Restriction of Range

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

When results end up with mostly high scores

A

Ceiling Effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

When results end up with mostly low scores

A

Floor Effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
A change in behaviour that emerges more or less spontaneously over time
Maturation Threat
26
An external event that effects most members of the treatment group at the same time
History Threat
27
When a performance is extreme (low or high) due to random chance and scores regress back to the mean (average) during subsequent testing
Regression Threat
28
Reduction in participant numbers that occurs when people drop out before the end of a study
Attrition Threat
29
Change in the participants as a result of taking a test more than once (practice, fatigue effects)
Testing Threats
30
When an instrument changes over time or is not precise at measuring what its supposed to
Instrumentation Threat
31
When participants guess what the study is supposed to be about and change their behaviour in the expected direction
Demand Characteristics
32
When people receive treatment and improve but only because they believe they are receiving a valid treatment
Placebo Effect
33
Separate dependent variable used to make sure the manipulation of a variable worked
Manipulation Check
34
Any factor that can inflate or deflate a person's true score on a dependent measure
Measurement Error
35
When a study is repeated as closely as possible to the original just with a new sample
Direct Replication
36
When a study is repeated with the same hypothesis and variables but the method is changed
Conceptual Replication
37
When a study is repeated with the same hypothesis and method but a new variable is added
Replication with Extension
38
A way of mathematically averaging the results of all studies that have tested the same variable to see what conclusion that whole body of evidence supports
Meta-Analysis
39
The idea that a meta-analysis might be overestimating the true size of an effect because null effects have not been included in the collection process
File Drawer Problem
40
Logical process of using data from a sample to make inferences about some population as a whole
Inferential Statistics
41
Point at which researchers place the p-value to determine whether or not to reject a hypothesis
Alpha Level
42
A test which allows researchers to test whether the difference between two group means in an independent-group design is statistically significant
t Test
43
Concluding that there IS an effect in a population when there is NO effect
Type I Error
44
Concluding there is NO effect in a population when there IS an effect
Type II Error
45
Designs with two or more independent varibales
Factorial Design
46
The simplest factorial design
2 x 2 Factorial Design
47
Each independent variables potential effect
Main Effect
48
When one thing changes because of another variable
Interaction
49
A design in which all levels receive different groups of people
Independent group design
50
A design in which one group receives all levels of a study
Repeated measure design
51
A design which is used when random assignment can not be done
Quasi-Experimental design
52
A control group which receives treatment later
Parallel group
53
A design which is usually focused only on a single case (or select few)
Small-N design
54
The extent to which the subjects in a study represent the population they are intended to represent - how well the setting in a study represent other settings or contexts
Generalizability
55
Aspect of external validity in which the focus is on whether a laboratory study generalizes to real-world settings
Ecological Validity
56
Laboratory research which is just as realistic as the real world
Experimental Realism
57
All other things equal, the simplest solution is the best
Parsimony (Occam's Razor)
58
When we accept a conclusion because it appears to make sense
Swayed by a Good Story
59
When we are persuaded by what comes easiest to mind, can lead us to overestimate frequency
Availability Heuristic
60
When we fail to think about what we can not see and focus only on what is readily present
Present/Present Bias
61
When we don't want to let go of our beliefs so we seek out information that supports them
Focusing on Evidence we Like Best
62
Asking only questions that lead to a particular, expected response
Confirmatory Hypothesis Testing
63
Belief that we are unlikely to fall prey to cognitive biases
Bias Blind Spot
64
Something that could vary but only has one level in a study
Constant
65
Variable whose levels are measured
Dependent Variable
66
Variable whose levels are manipualted
Independent Variable
67
Turning a concept of interest into a measured or manipulated variable
Operationalize
68
Variables with no meaningful numeric value
Categorical (nominal)
69
A claim which describes a particular rate or degree of a single variable
Frequency Claim
70
A claim which argues that one level of a variable is linked with a particular level of another variable
Association Claim
71
A claim which argues that one variable is responsible for changing the other
Causal Claim
72
How well the variables in a study are measured or manipulated
Construct Validity
73
The extent to which results of a study generalize to some larger population as well as other situations
External Validity
74
The strength of an effect and its statistical significance
Statistical Validity
75
The extent to which a third variable is not responsible for the outcome of a study
Internal Validity
76
Statistical tool used to organize and summarize the properties of a set of data
Descriptive Statistics
77
A measure of what value the individual scores tend to center on
Central Tendency
78
The most common score
Mode
79
The value of the middlemost score
Median
80
The average score
Mean
81
Computation that captures how far, on average, each score is from the mean
Standard Deviation
82
Computation that quantifies how spread out scores of a sample are around their mean
Variance
83
A variable whose values can be recorded as meaningful numbers
Quantitative Variable
84
A scale whose levels represent ranked order in which it is unclear the distance between levels Example: Handing in exams in a pile- can determine order but not time between each
Ordinal Scale
85
A scale which has no true zero and numbers represent equal intervals Example: IQ - difference between numbers are equal but you can't have zero intelligence
Interval scale
86
A scale whose numerals have equal intervals but the value of zero really means nothing Examples: How many time someone sneezes
Ratio scale
87
How consistent a measure is at measuring what its supposed to measure
Reliability
88
The consistency in results every time a measure is used
Test-Retest Reliability
89
The degree to which two or more observers give consistent ratings
Interrater Reliability
90
The consistency in answers no matter how a question is phrased
Internal Reliability
91
A measures accuracy in measuring what its supposed to
Validity
92
The extent to which a measure is subjectively considered valid due to how it appears
Face Validity
93
The extent to which a measure captures all parts of a defined construct
Content Validity
94
The extent to which a measure is correlated with a behaviour or concrete outcome it should be related to
Criterion Validity
95
Extent to which a measure is associated with other measures of a theoretically similar construct
Convergent Validity
96
Extent to which a measure does not associate strongly with measures of theoretically different constructs
Discriminant Validity
97
Degree to which the causal variable is related to the effect
Covariance
98
Degree to which the causal variable comes before the effect variable in time
Temporal Precedence
99
Alternative explanations
Confounds
100
Participants in one levels are systematically different than those in the other
Selection effects