Early Breast Cancer Flashcards
(39 cards)
When is an MRI of the breast considered?
Familial breast cancer a/w BRCA mutations
Breast implants
Lobular Cancer
Multifocality/multicentricity (ESP in lobular cancers)
Large discrepancies between conventional imaging and clinical examination
What defines HER2 positivity?
By IHC:
3+ when >10% of the cells harbour a complete membrane staining
(Previously, this value was 30%)
By In-situ Hybridisation:
Positive if the number of HER2 gene copies is 6 or more; OR
HER2/Chromosome 17 is 2 or more, instead of 2.2
*** If a case is defined as equivocal after 2 tests, it is eligible for Trastuzumab, and should be discussed in MTB
Tell me the T staging for breast cancer
T1 2cm or less
T1mi = Tumor 1mm or less
T1a Tumor >1mm but 5mm or less
T1b Tumor >5mm but 10mm or less
T1c Tumor >10mm but 20mm or less
T2 Tumor >20mm but 50mm or less
T3 Tumor >5cm
T4 Tumor of any size, with direct extension to the chest wall +/- skin (ulceration or skin nodules)
- Chest wall includes Ribs, intercostal muscles, serratus anterior muscle. NOT pectoral is muscle.
- Dimpling, nipple retraction/skin changes does not count unless T4b and T4d.
T4a = Extension to chest wall T4b = ulceration and/or ipsilateral satellite nodules +/- oedema (incl peau d' orange) of the skin, which do not meet criteria for inflammatory carcinoma T4c = T4a+T4b T4d = Inflammatory carcinoma
What is inflammatory carcinoma
A clinical-pathological entity
Characterized by diffuse erythema and oedema (peau d’orange) involving a third or more of the skin of the breast.
Skin changes are due to lymphoedema caused by tumor emboli within dermal lymphatic system.
What is the pathological N staging for breast cancer?
pN1 = Micromets; or mets in 1-3 Axillary LN; +/- internal mammary LN with mets detected by SLNB
pN1mi = Micromets >0.2mm +/- >200 cells but none >2mm PN1a = mets in 1-3 Axillary LN, at least one >2mm PN1b = internal mammary LN with Micromets or Macromets detected by SLNB pN1c = 1-3Axillary LN + internal mammary LN with Micromets/Macromets detected by SLNB
pN2 = mets in 4-9 Axillary LN; or in clinically detected internal mammary LN in the absence of Axillary LN pN2a = 4-9 Axillary LN, at least one >2mm pN2b = mets in clinically detected internal mammary LN in the absence of Axillary LN
pN3 = 10 or more Axillary LN; OR Infra clavicle (level 3); OR Clinically detected ipsilateral Int mammary LN in the presence of one or more positive level I, II Axillary LN; OR in >3 Axillary LN + internal mammary LN with Micromets or Macromets detected by SLNB; OR ipsilateral supraclav LN
pN3a = 10 or more Axillary LN, at least one >2mm; OR infraclavicular LN
pN3b = ipsilateral internal mammary LN + 1 or more Axillary LN; OR
- >3 Axillary LN and in INT mammary LN with micromet o Macromets
pN3c = ipsilateral supracalvicular LN
Some conclusions from staging of breast cancer?
T1N0M0 = Stage IA T2N0M0 = Stage IIA T3N0M0 = Stage IIB T4N0M0 = Stage IIIB
N2 = At least Stage IIIA N3 = At least Stage IIIC T4 = At least Stage IIIB
In DCIS, does Tamoxifen work?
Yes, in ER+DCIS.
Tamoxifen:
- decreases the risk of invasive & non-invasive recurrences.
- reducEs the incidence of a 2nd contralateral primary breast cancer
*But no effect on OS
After mastectomy, Tamoxifen might be considered to decrease the risk of Contralateral breast cancer in those at high risk of new breast tumors.
How is HER2 status assessed?
By measuring the number of HER2 Gene copies using in-situ Hybridisation (ISH) techniques;
OR
By a complementary method in which the quantity of HER2 cell surface receptors by IHC
- Assigment of HER2 status based on mRNA assays or Multigene arrays is NOT recommended
What is classified as HER2+ ?
3+ by an IHC method defined as uniform membrane staining for HER2 in 10% or more of tumor cells
OR
Demonstrate HER2 Gene amplification by ISH method
- Single probe, average HER2 copy number is 6 or more signals/cell
- Dual probe HER2/CEP17 ratio = 2 or more with an average of HER2 copy number as 4 or more signals/cell
- Dual probe HER2/chromosome enumeration probe (CEP)17 ratio = 2 or more wth an average HER2 copy number
How often will there be invasive cancer found when only pure DCIS was detected on core needle biopsy?
25%
What is considered widespread disease in DCIS?
How is the management different?
Disease in 2 or more quadrants
- Patients will then require a total mastectomy WITHOUT LN dissection
As opposed to just lumpectomy with negative margins, followed by +/- whole breast radiation
What is the recurrence rate in excised DCIS?
1) Retrospective study of 220 patients: DCIS + RT: - 4 y Recurrence rate 0 DCIS - RT: - 4y Recurrence rate 5.5%
2) Prospective phase II study on women with low-risk DCIS s/p WE alone. (No adjuvant RT, no adjuvant Tamoxifen)
- 10y local recurrence rate 1.5%
- Low risk: mammographically detected DCIS, 2.5cm or less, G1/2, margin 1cm or more or a negative re-excision
3) Retrospective series:
- margin width 10mm, RT had no additional benefit. 8y local recurrence rate 4%
- margin with 1mm to
What does NCCN recommend in the management of DCIS?
1) Lumpectomy + Whole breast R
2) Total mastectomy +/- SLNB +/- Reconstruction
3) lumpectomy –> Observation
What are the side-effects of GnRH agonists?
Vast motor symptoms
Loss of bone density
Tell me about the POEMS study
The Prevention Of Early Menopause Study
Moore et al NEJM 2015
Aim: to evaluate GnRH agonists efficacy in protecting ovarian function
N=200 Premenopausal, hormone receptor negative 2 arms: 1) Standard chemo with Goserelin 2) Standard chemo without Goserelin
Goserelin was given SC 3.6mg Q4weeks
- beginnings 1week before chemo and continued to within 2weeks before or after final chemo
RESULTS:
- Ovarian failure rate was 8% in Goserelin group and 22% in chemo-alone group
- Pregnancy occurred more in Goserelin group. 20% vs 10%
- Goserelin group had improved OS 80% in chemo-alone group and 90% in Goserelin group.
- Improved 4y DFS in Goserelin group at 90% and 80%
When is lumpectomy contraindicated?
Pregnant women. (And who would require RT during pregnancy)
Diffuse suspicious or malignant-appearing microcalcifications
Widespread disease that cannot be incorporated by local excision through a single excision with satisfactory cosmetic result
Diffuse lay positive pathologic margins
Relative contraindications: - previous RT to breast/chest wall Active connective tissue disease involving the skin (ESP scleroderma/lupus) Tumors >5cm Positive pathologic margins
Tell me about the SOFT and TEXT trials conclusions.
Premenopausal women with Hormone receptor+ early stage breast cancer were assigned to:
1) Exemestane + ovarian suppression
2) Tamoxifen + ovarian suppression
Both for 5 years each.
Ovarian suppression methods:
- GnRH agonist Triptorelin
- Oophrectomy
- Ovarian irradiation
RESULTS:
DFS 93% (EO) vs 89% (TO)
OS~
============
Tell me about the SOFT trial
Premenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer were randomized to: 1) Tamoxifen 2) Tamoxifen+Ovarian suppression 3) Exemestane+Ovarian suppression Each for 5 years
RESULTS:
(1) Primary analysis: Tam+Ovarian suppression was NOT superior to Tam alone for DFS.
- AFter 5.5 years, DFS rate 86.5% (TO) vs 84.7% (Tam) [trend]
(2) Subgroup analysis: women at high risk of recurrence s/p prior chemo, had improved outcomes with Ovarian suppression
- 5y DFS: 78% (Tam); 82.5%(TO); 86%(EO)
Tell me about the ARNO95 Study
Kaufmann JCO 2007
Aim: To evaluate the benefits of switching to Anastrozole after 2y of Tam treatment VS continuing on Tam for total 5y
N=1000 S/p Tam for 2 years 2 arms: 1) Tamoxifen for 3 more years 2) Anastrozole 1mg/day for 3 years
RESULTS
1) Reduction in risk of disease recurrence HR 0.66 (=34% reduction in the RR of disease recurrence/death)
- 5y DFS 93.5% for Anastrozole and 89.5% for Tam
2) Improved OS HR 0.53 (= 47% improvement in OS)
Tell me about the IES study
Coombes Lancet 2007
n=4700 Post-menopausal Unilateral, invasive, ER+ or ER Unknown breast cancer who were Disease-free on 2-3 y of Tamoxifen randomized to: 1) Exemestane 2) Continue Tamoxifen
RESULTS:
F/u 4.5 years
DFS better with Exemestane HR 0.76
Adjusted HR for death 0.83, in favor of Exemestane
Any benefit beyond 5 years of hormonal treatment?
Yes
MA.17 Peter Goss, JNCI 2005
Aim: Determine if extended adjuvant therapy with Letrozole reduces the risk of late recurrences
N=5000 Post-menopausal S/p 5 years of Tamoxifen, randomized to: 1) Letrozole 2) Placebo
F/u 2.5 years:
RESULTS:
1) Improved DFS and distant DFS HR 0.6
2) In main group, OS similar, except in LN+, OS improved with HR 0.6
3) more hormonally related s/e with Letrozole, but incidences of bone fractures and CVS events similar.
Tell me about the BIG 1-98 study
Thurlimann NEJM 2005
Aim:
Letrozole shown to be more effective in MBC and in neoadjuvant setting as cf to Tamoxifen. hence, trial done to compare Letrozole and Tamoxifen.
N=8000
HR+ post-menopausal women
4 arms:
1) Letrozole
2) Letrozole –> Tamoxifen
3) Tamoxifen
4) Tamoxifen –> Letrozole
F/u 2years
RESULTS:
5y DFS 84% (Letrozole) vs 81.4% (Tamoxifen)
ESP risk of distant met HR 0.73
After a longer f/u of 6years,
No significant improvement in DFS noted with Tam–> Let OR Let–>Tam a cf to Letrozole alone.
What are the 5 trials that studied the use of Tamoxifen–>AI vs continued Tamoxifen ?
1) Italian Tamoxifen Anastrozole trial
2) IES trial
3) ABGSG8 trial
4) ARNO 95
5) TEAM trial
Tell me about the Italian Tamoxifen Anastrozole trial (ITA)
N=400 post menopausal women
S/p 2-3 years of Tamoxifen, randomized to:
1) Continued Tamoxifen
2) Anastrozole
HR for relapse strongly favored sequential treatment with Anastrozole HR 0.35
