EMPIRE IN THE INTERWAR YEARS Flashcards
diplomatic, economic, popular culture (75 cards)
key examples of the 1929 colonial development and welfare acts failing
- only 1 million pounds was given in the first 3 years by 1932 - britain could not fulfill economic promises
- britain was unable to fulfill this idea of a civilising mission due to investing less money to the colonies themselves
- ie governor of tanganyika = “mothballs”
- only 10-15% of kenyan children attended schools by 1938 - lack of infrastructure growth
- gov expen on development = capped at 3-8 shillings in 1930s in nyasaland
- white settlers ban production of tea + coffee in east africa for local africans
- it was up to colonies to develop these regions through local taxation
- the prices of goods fell (ie african cocoa = less insular empire)
atlantic charter
1941
- churchhill and president of USA
- agreement not to take more territory, respect people’s rights to choose government, respect people’s land and sovereignty, collaborate with all nations, abandon force, disarm nations, promote world freedom and self-determination
reciprocal free trade agreement act
1934
- america commits to free trade, but this act only limited progress
- america tries to counter-act british economic dominance, but fails
examples of empire weakening in terms of manpower in interwar years
- 1/5th of the british merchant fleet was laid up in the 1920’s
- loss of the irish
1922 empire settlement act
- 3 million pounds a year committed to empire migration and movement in empire for emplyoment
*link to 1919 solider settlement scheme
economic impact of WWI on britain
- britain was taken off the gold standard, returns in 1925, leaves again in 1931 - no continuity
- WWI cost around 35,000 million pounds - 13x SBW
- britain borrows $4 billion from the USA
- britain became too focused on the production of wartime goods, international competitors begin to take over with production of domestic goods
- britain is taking in 1100 million worth of imports, compared with 700 million pre-war (no trade balance
what were the imperial conferences and describe the 1926 imperial conference
- a series of conferences from 1887 up until WWI
- they would address constitutional issues, and would clarify the relationship between britain and her territories
1926:
- this conference promoted south african nationalism, and was supported by the irish
- it was a conference between irish, white dominion states to clarity how a dominion could leave the commonwealth etc
- accepted the strength of dominions to be separate
- it would be impractical to try and drag colonies into such a mess
what types of challenges to empire did Britain face in the interwar years
- political challenges to empire (nationalism)
- economic challenges to empire (trade and commerce)
- a lack of home support for empire?
- diplomatic challenges over british world power
describe the 1929 colonial development and welfare act + who drove this
was driven by amery
- aimed to improve socio-economic conditions in colonies in response to the wall street crash and WWI
- it displays how britain took a more interventionist approach
- initially allocated 1 million pounds to economic development, not necessarily welfare
- didn’t necessarily follow a civilising mission, but britain wanted to remove this idea of noble savage
- but aimed to build bonds of empire by being more respectful and conscious of their colonies (indirectly ruling)
why were the british worried about axis powers
- they had support of some dominions (ie many indian soliders defect)
- axis powers had the power to undermine what the british wanted
- axis powers provoked nationalism
- targeted key british strategic interests
examples of international powers threatening Britain during the interwar years
- the value of US exports to Britain tripled
- 1921 Washington Naval Conference forces Britain to abandon its double standard naval position, and has the same ratio of naval ships as the US
- in 1919 America and Mexico were making 7.5m barrels of oil, in 1934, they were making 57 barrells
- japanese treaties
- italy attempting to take abyssinia in 1935
- britain lacked security from the league of nations
british hesitations to palestine
- it was strategically critical, given access to suez and the rest of the middle east and asia
- but it was so politically hostile and easy to ignite nationalist sentiment (ie turkish resentment) that britain could not impose the rule they wanted
how may morale have empire improved during the interwar years
- 1916 establishment of Empire day
- 1924 Wembley Exhibition, mirrors the 1890 Africa Exhibition in London
unemployment in britain post WWI
- racially motivated riots broke out in liverpool and london for non-white residents taking jobs
- in 1919 the solider settlement scheme was formed to promote migration and jobs in empire + deter unemployment
- 5000 white people initiated violence, 15 white people arrested
roca-runciman pact
1933
- britain diverging from what was agreed in the ottawa conference
- allowed argentina to keep its pre-ottawa share for chilled beef
- argentina sending 40% of its exports to britain
describe the wall street crash and great depression / impact on empire
1929+1932
- forces britain to pivot with how it wants to maintain economic bonds with empire (exports, imports - internal decline)
- trade slowed, lack of demand
- political instability between ramsay and conservatives
- burdonsome cost of maintaining empire (ie 1931 westminster - choose to leave if you want)
- britain tries to impose imperial preference
- displayed the lack of decisive power of britain, caused nationalism
- causes political split in empire, bc to fix it, britain wants free trade, but phillip snowden condemns this, whilst conservatives support this
evidence of British strengthening empire in terms of civilising mission, resources etc
- 1929 colonial development and welfare acts
- resources = ottawa?
british imperial defence attitude
- unwilling to challenge the USA (ie don’t renew treaty in 1921 w japan after renewing 2x before) - break power in asia
- USA had dominion support - britain need backing
- britain had shrunk its naval influence from 1921 - needs washington and willing to sacrifice
- sacrifice to defend and promote peace - britian know they cannot conduct another war
- britain degraded itself to a 5:5:3 naval ratio as to not go against the USA and have their backing (knew colonies would support USA)
how did india economically challenge Britain in the interwar years
- 1938, exchequer was responsible for meeting the cost of Indian army campaigns, leaving Britain with a debt of 13,000 million pounds to India
- 1924 - gandhi establishes the all indian spinners association to promote economic self reliance and satyagraha
- Gandhi’s Salt March 1931(nationalist boycotts which had vast economic impacts)
battle of el alamein
1942
- british defeat german army in egypt and get germany out of north africa to secure british interests in middle east (ie SUEZ)
*nationalists use this as a chance to exploit british weaknesses (ie burma = independence army)
media attitudes to empire
- the media became a critical tool in amplifying approval and appreciation for empire
- overall, positive presentation of empire, given not only that the media was often government sponsored, but those with access to TV media would be members of upper classes - thereby further shaping this approval and like of empire
- the use of media was to give an insight into aspects of empire - ie ‘life in the british west indies’
domestic impact of WWI on britain
- look at sheet called domestic economic impacts
1919 solider settlement scheme
- led by northey
- example of allowing a massive influx of white settlers into kenya (by 1919, white settler figures increase by 200%)
- british take land from the nandi people (18 square miles)
naval base singapore
1921**
- 25 million spent to deter japanese agression and enforce british presence
- singapore became a critical target
- however, it falls quickly in the war in 1942 to japan
- british want to assert their military dominance and presence and a physical rejection to japanese power
- british want to exemplify their expansive power to america to be worthy of an alliance with america
- singapore was to be closer to aus + NZ to have closer ties
- the problems: strategic uncertainty, financial pressure, it would antagonise japan, it went against precedent for rearmament