Exam 2: RHS Flashcards

(41 cards)

1
Q

50% of adults with RH strokes have

A

cog-comm disorders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

50% of adults with LH strokes have

A

aphasia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

~95% of adults with aphasia receive

A

inpatient speech-language rehab treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

~80% of adults with cog-comm disorders associated with RHS receive

A

inpatient speech-language rehab treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

attention problems

A

50% divided attn
35% selective attn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Anosognosia

A

lack of awareness of deficit
*improves over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

suppression

A

inhibition of contextually-irrelevant meanings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

semantic lang probs

A

suppression
figurative language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

prag language probs

A

conversation
affect & emotion
theory of mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

nonlinguistic deficits

A

attn deficits
lack of awareness
visuoperceptual deficits
cog/executive dysfunction
neglect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

attn deficits

A

may be hyper- or hypo-aroused or have difficulty sustaining attn, especially on the left side

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

visuoperceptual deficits

A

object recognition
constructional tasks (puzzles, blocks)
spatial orientation (familiar routes, moving from point A to point B)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

neglect

A

pt. fails to report, respond, or orient to stimuli on side opposite of brain lesion (contralateral) despite the motor and sensory capacity to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

may be one manifestation of a larger, more generalized attentional impairment; considered an intellectual and not just a perceptual deficit

A

neglect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Neglect in LHS

A

often resolves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Neglect in RHS

A

may persist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

subtypes of neglect

A

viewer-centered (egocentric)
stimulus/object centered (allocentric)

18
Q

egocentric neglect

A

“left” shifts w person’s visual focus

19
Q

allocentric neglect

A

“left” side of objects is neglected regardless of placement in visual field

20
Q

evaluation nonlinguistic deficits

A

cancellation
scanning
line bisection
drawing tasks
oral reading tasks
writing tasks

21
Q

linguistic deficits

A

word discrimination
naming
following commands
word definitions
word fluency
reading & reading comp
writing

22
Q

often, linguistic deficits are

A

mild and do not affect communication significantly

23
Q

to evaluate linguistic deficits:

A

traditional language Ax

24
Q

understanding of implied meaning of complex narratives

A

extralinguistic deficit

25
understanding humor, irony, and sarcasm
extralinguistic deficit
26
expressing their own intended meaning
extralinguistic deficit
27
using extralinguistic cues that convey emotion
extralinguistic deficit
28
occasionally, confabulation
extralinguistic deficit
29
extracting and integrating bits of info
extralinguistic deficit
30
generative alternative meanings
extralinguistic deficit
31
comprehending and expressing emotion
extralinguistic deficit
32
comprehending and producing prosody
extralinguistic deficit
33
to evaluate extralinguistic deficits
language sample (structure & content) picture description tell a joke and ask pt. to explain why it is funny
34
apragmatism
a disorder in conveying and/or comprehending meaning or intent through linguistic, paralinguistic, and/or extralinguistic modes of context-dependent communication
35
context of apragmatism
convo partners environment cultural considerations goal of the interaction
36
Impact of RHS deficits on outcomes, cognitive deficits, unilateral neglect, and anosognosia
mortality functional status on discharge long term recovery quality of life dependence in ADLs length of stay discharge to dependent setting participation-level outcomes
37
impact of apragmatism
lack of empathy poor reader of non-verbal cues
38
Why do RH strokes fall through the cracks?
have to be more severe before they can be identified as easily as LH strokes
39
anosodiaphoria
seem indifferent to the problem (may make them less likely to seek help)
40
RH stroke patients are less likely to:
*get the the ED within the first 3 hours *get clot busting drug Tx than LH strokes (but twice as likely to get tPA if they demonstrate neglect) *undergo longer hospital stays because they typically arrive at the ED later than pts w LH strokes
41
social interactions will uncover deficits
better than test scores