Formation Flashcards

(31 cards)

1
Q

Conceptual model of the primary dimensions that underlie individual differences in personality:

extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience

A

Big Five theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Degree to which an individual tends to seek out social contacts.

A

Extraversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Degree to which one’s values, attitudes, and outlooks emphasize, and facilitate establishing and maintaining, connections to others.

A

Relationality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dispositional tendency to seek out others

A

Need for affiliation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dispositional tendency to seek warm, positive relationships with others

A

Need for intimacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Dispositional tendency to seek control over others.

A

Need for power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Theory of group formation and development
proposed by William Schutz that emphasizes compatibility among three basic social motives: inclusion, control, and affection.

A

Fundamental Interpersonal Relations Orientation (FIRO)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Feeling of apprehension and embarrassment experienced when anticipating or actually interacting with other people.

A

Social anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

One’s characteristic approach to relationships with other people:

secure, preoccupied, fearful, and dismissing

A

Attachment style

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluating the accuracy of personal beliefs and attitudes by comparing oneself to others

A

Social comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Comparing oneself to others who are performing less effectively relative to
oneself.

A

Downward social comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Comparing oneself to others who are performing more effectively relative to
oneself.

A

Upward social comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Theory proposed by Abraham Tesser which assumes that individuals maintain and enhance self-esteem by associating with high-achieving individuals who excel in areas that
are not relevant to their own sense of self-esteem and avoiding association with high-achieving individuals who excel in areas that are important to their sense of self-esteem.

A

Self-evaluation maintenance (SEM) model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A sense of belonging, emotional support,
advice, guidance, tangible assistance, and spiritual perspective given to others when they experience stress, daily hassles, and more significant life crises.

A

Social support

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Dispositional tendency to compare oneself to others.

A

Social comparison orientation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Some Forms of Social Support Provided by Groups (5)

A

Belonging
Emotional support
Informational support
Instrumental support
Spiritual support

17
Q

Some Forms of Social Support Provided by Groups

Inclusion in a group

18
Q

Some Forms of Social Support Provided by Groups

Expressing caring and concern for one another

A

Emotional support

19
Q

Some Forms of Social Support Provided by Groups

Providing advice and guidance

A

Informational support

20
Q

Some Forms of Social Support Provided by Groups

Providing tangible resources

A

Instrumental support

21
Q

Some Forms of Social Support Provided by Groups

Addressing issues of meaning and purpose

A

Spiritual support

22
Q

Feelings of desperation, boredom, self deprecation, and depression experienced when individuals feel their personal relationships are too few or too
unsatisfying

23
Q

Tendency for individuals to form interpersonal relations with those who are close by.

A

Proximity principle

24
Q

Tendency for groups to expand as members form dyadic associations with someone
who is not in the group and thereby draw the nonmember into the group.

A

Elaboration principle

25
Tendency to affiliate with or be attracted to similar others; this tendency causes groups and other interpersonal aggregates to be composed of individuals who are similar to one another rather than dissimilar.
Similarity principle
26
Tendency for group members to display certain affinities, such as similarities in demographic background, attitudes, values, or so on; the overall degree of similarity of individuals within the same group.
Homophily
27
Tendency for group members to like people who are dissimilar to them in ways that complement their personal qualities.
Complementarity principle
28
As described by William Schutz, compatibility between group members based on their similar needs for inclusion, control, and affection.
Interchange compatibility
29
Tendency for liking to be met with liking in return; if A likes B then B will tend to like A.
Reciprocity principle
30
Tendency to prefer relationships and group memberships that provide the maximum number of valued rewards and incur the fewest number of possible costs.
Minimax principle
31
In John Thibaut and Harold Kelley’s social exchange theory, the standard by which individuals evaluate the quality of other groups that they may join.
Comparison level for alternatives (CLalt)