From Danko Quizzes (4+) Flashcards
- Scott Harding died recently (at age 74), with a taxable estate of roughly $8 million. Some years
ago he had seen an estate tax attorney and completed an extensive estate plan with a variety of
trusts. Among his assets is a stone-constructed New England farm house having a current fair
market value of $2 million. Scott’s will bequeathed the home to Clarisse who, due to authoring a
best-selling mystery novel, is worth approximately $20 million in her own right. Nevertheless,
when Scott died, Clarisse, (under the guidance of her tax advisor), did not want to own the
home outright, fearing it would become part of her already substantial gross estate. However,
she wishes to live in the home where she can continue to write and enjoy her grandchildren for
the rest of her life. The home had been in the Harding family since its arrival in America in 1789.
At the time of his death it was owned fee simple by Scott. There is great sentiment associated
with the home: Scott and his wife, Clarisse (age 66) were married in the home and raised their
two children Rebecca and Jonah (now adults) there. What technique, if any, will accomplish
Clarisse’s goals?
A. Clarisse cannot have her cake and eat it too: If she disclaims ownership of the home, she
may not live there without paying fair market rent.
B. With a proper provision in Scott’s will, if Clarisse disclaims ownership of the home, it can be
transferred to a disclaimer trust, the terms of which permit Clarisse to live in the home for
her lifetime. This would be a family trust.
C. With a proper provision in Scott’s will, if Clarisse disclaims ownership of the home, it can be
transferred to a disclaimer trust, the terms of which permit Clarisse to live in the home for
her lifetime. This would be a marital trust because Clarisse has a life interest in the home.
D. A qualified personal residence trust (QPRT) should accomplish Clarisse’s dual goals of not
including Scott’s home in her gross estate and the right to live in the home for her entire
lifetime.
B. Many well written wills include disclaimer trust provisions which give the surviving spouse the
ability to put specific disclaimed assets into the trust by disclaiming ownership of a portion of
the estate. Disclaimed property interests are transferred to the trust, without being taxed.
Provisions can be written into the trust that provide for regular payouts from the trust to
support survivors, or in the case of the Hardings, the right to occupy (but not own) property.
The trust can also be written so that surviving minor children can also be provided for, as long as
the surviving spouse elects to disclaim inherited assets, passing them on to the trust. To keep
the assets from being included in Clarisse’s estate, the trust would have to be a family trust
rather than a marital trust.
If a disclaimer trust is used, the full extent of the tax planning occurs upon the death of the first
spouse. At that point, the surviving spouse can either accept the trust assets or disclaim them. I
f he or she disclaims them into the disclaimer trust, the trust will function like a credit shelter
trust that will shelter the assets from inclusion in the surviving spouse’s estate. But if there is no
tax reason to use credit shelter planning, the spouse can simply receive the assets outright. This
allows tax-planning flexibility without creating unnecessary complication.
Using answer D will mean for the life of the QPRT it could be brought back into her estate. It is
not a bad answer. With Answer B, the house uses the exemption. Suggestion: The questions
are not too long to read. I would recommend reading it first.
Your client, Martha, requested a meeting with you. Martha is married to Glen. Glen is a
workaholic. You only met him once to set up their joint account. Martha always makes all the
investment decisions. Glen makes a lot of money, but Martha saves a majority of it through
frugal living. As the meeting starts, Martha is quite blunt. Glen has taken up with one of the
girls at the plant. Cash flow to Martha from Glen has ceased. He set up a separate bank
account in his name. She wants your advice on how to handle the assets in the investment
account.
A. Tell her to break the joint tenancy account and retitle as tenants in common.
B. Tell her you need to secure statements from both her and Glen to proceed with any
changes.
C. Tell her to see a divorce attorney before you can proceed to change the account into her
name.
D. Call up Glen and ask him to come into your office.
B. The account is in joint names, both are clients. She never says she wants to divorce him.
Also, to do Answer C, she has to get a divorce before you can proceed with the account titling.
Do you have enough of a relationship with Glen to select Answer D? Doubtful.
Answer A depends on Answer B
Mrs. Lucy, age 80, is in reasonable health. Five years ago, her husband died leaving her $3
million and placing $3.5 million in a bypass trust for her benefit. In addition, their home was in
JTWROS. The home, FMV value $500,000 and the $4 million of investments has a high basis of
$3.5 million. Mrs. Lucy has two married children and 5 grandchildren to keep her estate under
$5 million. What type of asset do you recommend she give and to whom?
A. Low basis, high dividend paying investments to both children and grandchildren.
B. High basis, high dividend paying investments to both children and grandchildren.
C. Low basis, growth investments to children and high basis, growth investments to
grandchildren.
D. High basis, growth investments to children and low basis, growth investments to
grandchildren.
B. Think ages. The grandchildren have to be age 30 maybe age 40. With high basis, they can sell
the investment with little or no tax or keep it and get big dividends. They could be taxed a 0% or
at most 15%. Low basis investments would be subject to capital gains. If she keeps the low
basis stocks until death, her estate will get a full step-up in basis. She does not have an estate
tax situation.
- Sid Thomas works for TTI, Inc. Sid makes $120,000 per year. TTI contracted with a disability
insurance company to buy long-term disability for its key employees. The carrier agreed to
insure up to 50% of salary. In Sid’s case, that is up to $5,000 per month. However, TTI only
agreed to pay for 60% of the $5,000 per month coverage with the provision that Sid could elect
to pay for the remaining 40%. Which of the following statements is/are true?
I. If Sid elects not to pay for the additional coverage, the disability benefits ($3,000) will be
taxable as income.
II. If Sid elects to pay for the additional coverage, 60% of the disability benefits are taxable
as income, and 40% are tax-free.
III. If Sid elects not to pay for the coverage, the disability benefits ($5,000) will be taxable as
income.
IV. If Sid elects to pay for the coverage, the disability benefits ($5,000) will be tax -free.
A. I, II B. I C. II D. III E. IV
A. 60% of the benefits are taxable as income (the company-paid portion of the premium), and
40% of the benefits are tax-free (if Sid pays the premium). The question says Sid could pay, not
had to pay which makes Answer I correct.
An existing client calls you, a CFP® professional, with a question about a topic you aren’t very
familiar with. She tells you her husband served in the military decades ago and is now receiving
care in a nursing home. She read a brochure at this new facility about a VA benefit called Aid
and Attendance that could pay her around $1,200 per month as the spouse of a serviceman who
is receiving skilled nursing care. She would like you to help her qualify for the benefit.
You tell her that you will do some homework and arrange a meeting with her the following week
to discuss their situation further. After doing some research, you discover that there are very
stringent income and asset restrictions to qualify for benefits. Since they have been clients for
years, you know they have a net worth of around four million dollars. In your meeting you
should:
A. Explain the income and asset thresholds that are well lower than their current situation.
Help her understand that this benefit is not intended for people in their financial position
and recommend they not pursue the benefit further.
B. Tell your client you aren’t an expert in this matter and put her in touch with an attorney
with whom you have worked the past whom you know to be a military veteran.
C. Review options for how the client may effectively reduce income and gift assets to qualify
for the benefit.
D. Recommend she purchase long term care insurance and review their current retirement and
investment objectives for other options to meet their needs.
. C. In D, you never address her objective and discuss options on how to qualify; you only give
recommendations apart from it. A is a good answer however you should let her determine if
she is willing to go to lengths to qualify, you shouldn’t be making the decision for her by
dismissing the option. B would be a great answer, but it is unclear if the attorney is competent
in the subject. In this meeting, you should review the client’s options as she requested, answer
C. Once that is done you may then decide to advise a more suitable solution (Answer D).
Subjective. If you answered B, I am not saying you are wrong. This is a practice question.
Alex and Susan Halton have been married for 5 years and each has children from a prior
marriage. Alex is self-employed as a homebuilding consultant with earnings after all expenses of
$150,000/yr. and plans to work 5 more years, while Susan is retiring from Verizon this year with
pension income of $60,000/yr., where her salary was 89,000/yr. Susan exercised 50 incentive
stock options this year with an option price of $20, when the stock was trading for $40 per
share. Also, Allan purchased 3 business use vehicles for his consulting practice in January for
$45,000 each and plans to forfeit any “special depreciation allowance” or section 179 expense,
and instead depreciate them using 5yr MACRS. Alex and Susan want to invest some of their
liquid assets totaling $50,000 into investments for income and have asked for your help. They
already have saved significant qualified retirement plan assets in excess of one million dollars in
well diversified mutual fund portfolios. What should you recommend? Hint: The CFP Board gives
you income tax charts. Are they in the 10-12% bracket? Are they in a 37% bracket? You have to
make decisions on this exam.
A. Recommend investment grade corporate bonds currently yielding 6%.
B. Recommend investment grade AMT private activity municipal bonds for several of the states
power companies currently yielding 4.5%.
C. Recommend state general obligation public purpose municipal bonds yielding 4.6%.
D. Recommend Verizon common stock, currently trading at $44 per share, since you know
Susan will love that idea based on her tenure with her lifelong employer, and because she
mentioned that Verizon pays a good dividend of $2.06 per share annually.
C. The correct answer is C because it has the highest yield for their tax situation and is an
income investment. There is no mention of maturity dates, so that should not be a factor to
consider. There is no mention of risk tolerance, so no judgment can be made on that. The
questions states investments for income not growth and income, so stocks would not be
suitable based on the client request.
A. Corporate bonds at 6% would yield an approximate after-tax income of 4.56% (24% tax)
which is lower than the tax-free yield of 4.6%
B. AMT could be triggered based on the ISOs exercised by Susan and the MACRS depreciation
for Alex, therefore, a private activity AMT bonds would not be suitable for them, as they would
end up paying AMT tax of around 26% on it bringing the yield to about 3.33%.
C. The taxable equivalent yield of the 4.6% municipal bonds should be approximately 6.05%
(24% tax) by dividing by the factor of .76 and is the best income for them.
D. Just because you know a client will like an idea, does not make it ethical. A common stock
should not be thought of as an income investment because of the growth component, and the
added volatility from equity investments. Even though, the yield ($2.06/$44) or 4.68% for a
qualified dividend would still be lower than the G.O. muni bond. (At a 15% cap gain rate the
after-tax income is 3.98%)
When dealing with a client’s estimated unequal cash flows from a potential investment, what is
the major difficulty that you, as a financial planner, may encounter?
A. Whether to use time value of money B. What discount rate to use C. Whether the investment under consideration should be rejected if the NPV is a negative number D. How the IRR will be reinvested
B. Answer C is a good answer. The difficulty is in determining what discount rate (client’s
required rate of return) to use for the investment.
What is the major difference between a red herring and a prospectus?
HINT: Think simple if you do not know. The question is quite easy if you eliminate the wrong
answers.
A. A red herring is a communist stock.
B. A red herring omits the selling price and the size of the issue.
C. If the front page of the prospectus is printed in red, then it is a red herring.
D. The SEC does not have to approve a red herring.
B. Although Answer C is true, the major difference is Answer B. The SEC has to approve a red
herring. Yes, questions come from material not covered.
Mr. Lukes owns a convenience store. After a storm hit his city, he donated $1,000 worth of food
to the American Red Cross. He feels he could have sold the food for $2,000. Normally, the
expenses associated with selling the food consume 50% of his profit. What amount of
charitable deduction can he take?
A. No contribution deduction is allowed.
B. 50% of his AGI
C. $1,000
D. $2,000
C. For self-employed individuals, partnerships, and Subchapter S corporations, the contribution
amount for inventory must be reduced by the amount, which would have been recognized as
gain if the property had been sold by the donor at its fair market value at the time of its
contribution to the charitable organization. In other words, the charitable contribution of
inventory is limited to its cost.
- What is a SERP?
I. It is a supplemental executive retirement plan.
II. It is an informally funded plan to provide benefits that greatly exceed those provided by a
normal retirement plan.
III. It is also called a “top hat” plan.
IV. It must cover all employees for supplemental benefits.
A. All of the above
B. I, II, III
C. I, II, IV
B. SERPs can only be provided for management or HCEs. This is where top hat comes from.
. Diane is a great photographer. She wants to donate one of her photos to the local art museum.
Her cost for film developing, printing, mounting, and framing is $250. The art museum curator
feels the photo is worth $3,000. If her AGI is $100,000, how much can she deduct for her gift to
the museum?
A. $0 – It is personal property.
B. $250
C. $1,500
D. $3,000
E. 50% of AGI
B. The tax deduction for a work of art created by the taxpayer is limited to basis. Please review
the income tax deductions for gifts to charity created by the taxpayer.
Harry Potter bought a $25,000 single premium deferred annuity 30 years ago at age 30. Now
approaching retirement, he is trying to decide if he should take the cash value ($110,000) as a
lump sum or annuitize the policy over a 20 year single life expectancy of $725 per month. When
he enters his retirement years his tax bracket will drop to 12% and he is concerned about
income. What would you recommend if he feels he can invest the lump sum and achieve a 6%
after-tax return?
A. He should take a lump sum and pay the tax
B. If he takes a lump sum, he will have to pay the tax plus a 10% penalty (annuity rules), he
should annuitize.
C. He should annuitize the contract.
D. He should take a lump sum because all he will get is 20 years of payments
C. Well, if he takes a lump sum Answer A he will pay 12% on $85,000 ($110,000 - 25,000 basis)
or $10,200. ($110,000 -10,200) x 6% = $5,988/year. $725 x (1 - 12.00%) = $638.00, $638.00 x 12
= $7,656/year
Answer C has a higher net of tax payout. Answer B is wrong. He is over 59½ so there is no 10%
penalty. Answer D is wrong as the payments continue after 20 years but are 100% taxable.
Tommy Todd died this year. He was an employee of a large company. The company owned a
group life policy covering him for $50,000 and the company also had a company benefit of
paying a $5,000 death benefit outright. If both death benefits were paid to Tommy’s wife, how
much would be subject to income tax?
A. $0
B. $5,000
C. $50,000
D. $55,000
B. A group life policy is normally owned by the company. The company pays the premium, but
the benefits (up to $50,000) are tax-free. The $5,000 death benefit paid the company used to
be tax-free (a De Minimis fringe benefit) but is now taxable.
Arthur is in a 35% income tax bracket. He has decided to buy a $40,000 car with cash. He needs
to sell an investment to raise cash. Which one of the following assets would generate the least
amount of tax liability if sold?
NOTE: LTCGs rate is 15%.
A. An annuity worth $30,000 with a basis of $28,000
B. A stock bought 6 months ago for $27,500, now worth $30,000
C. A stock bought 13 months ago for $24,000, now worth $30,000
D. A baseball card bought 2 years ago for $26,000, now worth $30,000
B. In regards to the annuity, you cannot assume he is over age 59½. The question must tell you
the person is over 59 1/2. You must assume it is a deferred annuity because it is worth more
than he bought it for originally. It cannot be an immediate annuity.
The tax is calculated as follows for each answer.
A. $2,000 ordinary income at 35%, plus 10% penalty on $2,000 = $900 (under 59 1/2)
B. $2,500 STCG at 35% = $875
C. $6,000 LTCG at 15% = $900
D. $4,000 at 28% = $1,120
Tammy is getting a divorce. As part of a property settlement, she is getting 50% ($250,000) of
her husband’s IRA ($500,000). Out of the settlement, she needs to buy a car ($20,000) with
cash. What should she do if her AGI is less than $100,000 this year (single)?
A. Take a distribution for $20,000 and roll over $230,000 into her own IRA. The $20,000 will be
subject to ordinary income tax but no 10% penalty (QDRO exception).
B. Roll the $250,000 into her own IRA. If she pledges $20,000 of the IRA to make the car loan,
only the loan interest would not be deductible (consumer interest).
C. Roll the $250,000 into a Roth IRA and then withdraw $20,000 to buy the car. Only the
$20,000 would be subject to ordinary income tax.
D. Take a 60-day distribution for the whole $250,000 and buy the car. Then, before the 60 days
are up, she could roll all available funds into her IRA and pay ordinary income tax and a 10%
penalty on the non-rollover money.
D. Answer A is wrong because this isn’t qualified plan money. QDROs only apply to qualified
plan distributions. Answer B is wrong because pledging the IRA to make a loan makes the IRA
subject to income tax and a 10% penalty. Doing Answer C would make the whole $250,000
subject to income tax and the $20,000 subject to a 10% penalty. I think Answer D is the best
answer. During the 60 days, she might find a cheaper car or find more liquid assets to reduce
the taxable event. This is the only possible answer.
Mr. Smart is shorting calls (at-the-money calls). What is his greatest risk? A. Time running out B. Market interest rates increasing C. The upside risk is unlimited. D. A flat market
C. Naked call writing is also called shorting calls. The maximum profit is the premium income.
Since the upside potential of a stock’s price is unlimited, the potential loss to the writer is
unlimited. A shorter defined is someone who believes that the price of the underlying stock will
drop or at worse will not rise (a flat market). Mr. Smart will be able to keep the premium
income (reference Live Review Investments page 21).
Sally Single works as an employee for a large company. The company has recently reduced
health benefits and increased deductibles in the company health insurance plan. Sally wants to
know what kinds of medical care costs not covered by her insurance are deductible subject to
7.5% of AGI.
I. Dental x-rays II. Athletic club expenses III. Bottled water bought to avoid drinking fluoridated city water IV. Divorced spouse's medical bills V. Eyeglasses
A. All of the above B. I, III, IV, V C. I, V D. III, IV, V E. IV
C. Medical expenses include the cost of diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of
disease or any treatment that affects a part or function of your body
While on a trip, Sandra’s wedding ring disappeared. The ring was worth $10,000. She has an
HO-3 policy. Which one of the following statements is true?
A. The coverage on the ring is limited to $1,000.
B. The coverage on the ring is limited to dollar amount ($1,000 - 1,500) if the loss is due to
theft.
C. If she has more than $10,000 personal property coverage, the ring is covered for its full
value.
D. The ring is not covered.
B. The ring is only covered if its disappearance is due to theft. The dollar amount shown is not
important. See Insurance pre-study lesson 3. It is a concept question (theft). There is no
coverage unless a theft occurred. The theft must be reported to the police. It is a
commonsense question/answer. Some policies cover jewelry up to $5,000.
Which of the following organizations would be considered public charities (50% organizations)?
I. Education organizations with regular faculty and curriculum & regularly enrolled students
II. Hospitals
III. The Rotary Club (a not-for-profit), which raises money for public causes
IV. The United Way
V. Public libraries
A. All of the above B. I, II, III, IV C. I, II, IV, V D. II, IV E. III, V
C. Rotary is a non-profit (Not-for-profit). It isn’t a public or private charity. The Rotary Club
would have to obtain IRS approval to receive tax deductible contributions.
Larry is disabled due to a job-related injury. He is being paid benefits under workers
compensation, Social Security, and his private disability plan (employer paid). Which of the
disability benefits could be taxable?
I. Workers compensation disability benefits
II. Social Security disability benefits
III. Private disability plan benefits
A. All of the above B. I, II C. I, III D. II, III E. II
D. If his MAGI is above certain levels, the Social Security benefits could be taxable. The private
disability plan benefits are taxable because the employer paid the premiums. It does not say it
was a taxable bonus. If the question said Larry paid the premiums on the private disability plan,
then what would be the answer? Answer E
Monica is age 13. She will not turn 14 until next year. She has an UTMA account set up by her
grandfather. (His tax bracket is 24%.) He invests her money for her. This year the UTMA had
the following income.
Municipal bond income of $500
LTCG of $600
Qualified dividends of $1,200
If her parents are in a 35% tax bracket, how much is her income tax? A. $0 B. $42.50 C. $70.00 D. $134.00 E. $145.00
A. Her taxable income is $1,800 ($600 plus $1,200). Her tax bracket is 10%, but the LTCGs and
dividends in the 10% bracket are subject to a 0% tax. Age 14 did not matter. She is not subject
to the kiddie tax as it starts at $2,200 ($1,100 free and $1,100 at 10%) Municipal bond income is
tax-free income. That is why $1,800 is taxable.
Which statements regarding a health FSA are correct?
I. It may receive contributions from an eligible person.
II. Allowable contributions are not subject to FICA.
III. Allowed contributions are not included in income.
IV. Reimbursements from the health FSA used for expenses are not taxed.
A. I, III B. I, II, IV C. I, II, III D. II, IV E. III, IV
C. Statement IV is wrong because it does not specify qualified medical expenses.
Patricia Cox owns a condo in Florida. Due to a hurricane, the condo roof was damaged. She has
an HO-6 unit owner’s policy. Does she have coverage if the condo owners association assesses
her for the deductible under the association policy?
A. She has no benefits under Coverage A.
B. She has named-perils benefits under Coverage A (limited).
C. She has 10% of Coverage C benefits for Coverage A.
D. She has benefits under Coverage C
B. According to one textbook, the HO-6 policy does provide $5,000 for Coverage A on a named perils basis. Most HO-6 policies have a $1,000 payment for loss assessment (also under
coverage A). This is the best choice. The other answers are wrong.
Your client, Susan bought a deluxe refrigerator 10 years ago. It cost Susan $1,200 when new. A
current model of the same refrigerator would now cost $1,500. The appliance was expected to
last 15 years. However, it was destroyed by a grease fire that started in Susan’s kitchen. How
much would the insurance carrier pay if Susan’s policy provided for used actual cash value
coverage?
A. $500
B. $1,000
C. $1,200
D. $1,500
A. Actual cash value is the current replacement value of $1,500 less depreciation of 10/15 of the
current replacement value of $1,500 ($1,000) or $500.