JR Cases, Irrationality

Question 1

R v Chief Constable of Sussex, es part International Ferry Traders Ltd (1999)

Answer 1

• Livestock importers not given police protection against animal activists
• Held to be reasonable because decision-maker had to consider so many competing factors that he determined that 24 hour police protection not necessary to protect their lives

Question 2

Gerry Cottle’s Circus v City of Edinburgh District Council (1990)

Answer 2

• The court held that the council was acting beyond its powers by refusing an application based solely on a view that the concept of performing animals was wrong.
• Held policy was irrational -> using powers for improper purposes

Question 3

La Belle Angele v City of Edinburgh Licensing Board (2001)

Answer 3

• Licensing board took into account irrelevant consideration, therefore decision held to be irrational