Lecture 8 - Problem solving Flashcards

1
Q

Definition of reasoning?

A

the ability to combine 2 or more pieces of information to draw a novel conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 2 types of reasoning?

A
  1. deductive reasoning = is said to occur when the conclusion is necessitated by the premises
  2. inductive reasoning = when the conclusion is likely from the premises, the conclusion can be drawn from the presented facts but is not necessarily true - the conclusion follows with some degree of probability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Navigation?

A
  • Is a fundamental problem for animals
  • The most efficient way of navigating would be to plot and then follow a course to a goal
  • This is very different from finding your way by trial and error and we can think of successful navigation as a form of deductive reasoning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dead reckoning/ path integration?

A
  • is 1 form of navigation
  • involves taking into account one’s own body movements
  • Wehner & Srinivasan:
    -> looked at the desert ant = problem of returning home as quickly as possible after finding food to avoid heat
    -> it uses dead reckoning to achieve efficient navigation rather than using landmarks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Piloting ?

A
  • another form of navigation
  • the ability to plot a course to a hidden goal using landmarks
  • can take place with multiple landmarks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Cognitive maps?

A
  • when an animal identifies it’s own position and uses it to plan a course to the goal
  • if animals possess a cognitive map then they should firstly be able to select a novel route, or shortcut, to a goal, and secondly make a detour around an obstacle that blocks a previously taken path
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Tolman et al.?

A

-> Conducted a number of experiments to try to find evidence of cognitive maps in rats
-> All appear to have some flaw, such as rats only selecting a novel route to a goal if the goal had a light above it
-> They also argued against stimulus response learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Morris 1981?

A
  • Trained rats to locate a hidden platform in a circular pool of water
  • They were always trained to find the platform in the same location, and always released from the same point on the edge of the pool
  • The experimental group, then received a test in which they were released from a new point on the edge of the pool
  • Nearly all the rats in the experimental group began their path to the goal by heading in the wrong direction
  • Taken together, Morris’s and Tolman’s experiments do not provide good evidence for the existence of cognitive maps in rats
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Insight - Kohler?

A
  • rejected Thorndike’s idea of trial and error
  • he showed that chimpanzees were able to use poles and boxes to get closer to fruit hung out of the chimps’ reach
  • he said this behaviour was evidence of insight, that the novel behaviour came as a result of a flash of inspiration after they had reasoned out the problem internally
  • one problem with Köhler’s conclusion is that the chimps were not naïve to interacting with boxes and poles and may have had experience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Epstein et al 1984?

A
  • conducted an experiment with pigeons
  • some trained to push a box to get food
  • then trained to stand on the box
  • birds with experience were quicker at this process = experience might be the key to explaining this insightful behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Analogical reasoning?

A
  • A subset of inductive reasoning is reasoning by analogy
  • Gillian and Premack 1981:
    -> Trained a chimpanzee to use language by pointing to symbols on a board
    -> It learned that one symbol meant ‘same as’, and was given a symbolic analogical reasoning task
    -> The example was two symbols that were identical except for their size
    -> Was then presented with a large triangle with a spot in it, and asked what the correct choice was between a small triangle with a spot in it, and a large triangle with no spot
    -> She understood, by analogy with the example relationship, that the correct answer (‘same as’) was the smaller of the two triangles
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly