what is meta ethics concerned with
what we mean when we say something is ‘good’
how does it differ from normative ethics
normative ethics is concerned with what is ‘good’
cognitvism
ethical language expresses idead subject to being proven true or false
non cognitivism
ethical language expresses opinions not subject to being proven true or false
ethical naturalism
-cognitive
-goodness is something real in the natural world
aristotalian naturalism
Aristotle claims goodness = eudaimonia (flourishing)
Flourishing factual feature of natural organisms.
who support aristotalian naturalism
Phillipa Foot
-factual, natural difference between a plant that is flourishing and a plant that is not. The same is true for humans.
Benthams argument
Humes criticism (especially Bentham)
Humes law
-criticise naturalism and cognitivism
-we cannot deduct conclusivley how to act from a fact
What is Moores argument called
Intuinism
Intuinism- what is good?
-Moore argues moral truths objective and real
-we know what is good through intuition not through science or logic
-cannot define good using naturalistic properties
Moore naturalistic fallacy
strengths of intuitionism
-set of core moral principles similar in all societies such as prohibitions on stealing and murder
-shows absolutist moral truth that all humans are somehow apprehending