What is a broad 3-point plan for managing earthquake exposure?
Measure
Monitor
Limit earthquake exposure
Define PML (Probable Maximum Loss).
$-value of loss of a major earthquake is unlikely to exceed ($-loss expected only once-per-X-years).
Define Gross and Net PML.
Gross: AFTER deductible, BEFORE reinsurance
Net: AFTER deductible, AFTER reinsurance
What are the 5 key principles for managing earthquake exposure?
Briefly describe the risk management EQ key principle.
Insuer should establish a clear risk appetite/risk Limit subject to oversight by Board of Directors and implemented by Senior Management
Briefly describe the Data Management EQ key principle.
Briefly describe the Models EQ key principle.
Understand assumptions, methods, limitations of earthquake models.
Briefly describe the PML (Probable Maximum Loss) EQ key principle.
PML = Total Expected Ultimate Cost
Includes considerations for data quality, non-modeled exposures, model uncertainty, multi-region exposure.
Briefly describe the Financial Resources & Contingency Plan EQ key principle.
Ensure adequate level of financial resources and appropriate contingency plans to successfully manage through a major earthquake.
Financial Resources: quantification of how financial resources cover PML
Contingency Plan: how to continue efficient business operations after disaster
Identify 2 items that should be documented for earthquake risk management.
Identify and briefly describe the 7 best practices for earthquake modelling.
(DAQKD-UP)
Document use of model within risk management programAlternatives: explain why a particular model is used vs alternativesQualified staff needed to run in-house models regularlyKnowledge of assumptions, methods and limitations of modelData granularity & quality is appropriateUncertainty: how it affects capital adequacy and reinsurance requirementsPML: explain differences between models and subsequent model adjustmentsIdentify 2 uses of earthquake models aside from PML calculation.
Identify 4 sound practices for earthquake model version.
more than 1 modeltimely updates of material changes to model (within 1 year of change)assumptions, methods, limitations of vendor software for PML calculationcompare result to alternate modelsIdentify 3 sound practices for earthquake model validation.
modeled losses with actual lossestail losses with market price for reinsuranceglobal data to supplement limited Canadian earthquake dataIdentify 4 non-modeled exposures to consider when calculating PML.
Exposure growth between date of data and relevant exposure period.adequacy of ITV (Insurance-to-Value)GRC (Guaranteed Replacement Cost) Increased seismicity after large eventIdentify 4 financial resources that can be used to support the PML for an earthquake.
How might management adjust for low data quality in earthquake PML estimate?
May add a margin of safety to the PML estimate (not an excuse to ignore data quality)
How might management adjust for model uncertainty in earthquake PML estimate?
May add a margin of safety to the PML estimate
Identify 2 disadvantages of using the maximum of (BC, QC) exposures for multi-region exposures.
How should PMLs be reported for Canadian versus foreign insurers with exposure outside Canada?
BoD and senior management would report PMLs to OSFI as follows:
Identify a restrictive condition on earthquake exposure financial resources for reinsurance coverage.
When including non-cat reinsurance must consider ‘per event’ limits and other events that may exhaust coverage.
Identify a restrictive condition on earthquake exposure financial resources for capital market financing.
OSFI prior approval is required before recognition as a financial resource (under MCT guidelines)
Identify a restrictive condition on earthquake exposure financial resources for capital & surplus.
Limited to a maximum of 10% of capital & surplus
Identify a restrictive condition on earthquake exposure financial resources for EPR.
Must not exceed countrywide PML500