Procedural Memory Flashcards

(40 cards)

1
Q

Define procedural

A

Heterogenous group of learning abilities unified by the fact they are not declarative - non conscious recall expressed via performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Procedures/Skills and habits - brain regions

A

Striatum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Implicit memory/priming - brain regions

A

Neocortex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Simple classical conditioning - brain regions

A

Cerebellum

Amygdala

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Non associative learning - brain regions

A

Reflex pathways

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Wevidence for distinction between declarative and procedural

A

Experimental studies
Neuro imaging
Neuropsychology
Amnesia patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define procedures/ skills and habits

A

Acts performed regularly - routine

Depend on habits to respond to new novel stimuli in the environment

Include:
Perceptual and ‘motor skills
Cognitive skills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How are skills and habits investigated in the lab

A

Perform challenging task over repeated trials and over sessions

Learning via improvement in speed/accuracy

Compare healthy to amnesia - amnesia show preserved skill learning? - dissociation between procedural and declarative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the mirror tracing task

A

Investigates perceptual and motor skills

Trace figure in paper by seeing mirror image of drawing

Healthy adults but but improve with training - amnesia also ie patient HM retain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe the persuit rotor task

A

Perceptual and motor skills

Pps maintain contact between stylus and disc on turntable

Time increase with practice in healthy, amnesia and alz

IMPAIRMENT IN HUNTINGTONS - basal ganglia damage includes striatum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Describe tower tasks

A

Cognitive skills

Tower of Hanoi - must plan ahead to complete quickly

Amnesia show mixed evidence and Huntington’s impaired

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define implicit learning

A

Learning about a stimulus in the environment without necessarily intending to do so

Resulting knowledge difficult to express

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe sequence learning ‘serial reaction time task’

A

Light appears in 1/4 locations horizontally on screen

Press correct key below the light as fast as possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe nissen and bullemer sequence learning

A
  1. Random sequence
  2. Repeating sequence - sequence follows a pattern

800 trials

Repeating sequence 50% reductions in RT but random little improvement

Many reported being aware of the pattern

BUT amnesia - improved without awareness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Willingham et al implicit sequence learning

A

Healthy pps show substantial improvement without explicit knowledge of sequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe destrebecqz and cleermens sequence learning

A

Pps see repeating sequence and asked to generate new sequence without old

Inadvertently generate old sequence - unaware that producing it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Describe Honda et al imaging data for sequence learning

A

Examined brain regions involved in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning using a PET & serial reaction time task

Press button in response to visual stimuli - 10 cycles of same 10 digit sequence

Recall of sequence + improvement after - explicit
RT improvement before sequence recall - implicit

18
Q

Results of IMPLICIT Hondas et al imaging data for sequence learning

A
Implicit assoc with:
Left sensorimotor cortex 
Left supplementary motor areas
Putamen (part of striatum) 
Left paretial
19
Q

Results of EXPLICIT Honda et al imaging data for sequence learning

A

Right PFC
right pre motor cortex
Paretial occipital cortex

(Implicit and explicit mediated by different structures)

20
Q

Masters - implicit learning everyday

A

Golf players learning to putt:

  1. Explicit learn by specific instructions over 4 sessions (100 putts)
  2. Implicit learning by practice sessions without instructions and secondary task (random no generation - remove conscious awareness by diverting attention )
21
Q

Results of masters implicit learning everyday

A

Both groups similar level putting performance after 4 sessions

Implicit little explicit knowledge of skills - few verbal protocols and rules than explicit

22
Q

Masters ‘test phase’ implicit learning in everyday

A

Told gold expert eval their performance via one way mirror and financial reward depending on performance - increase stress

Explicit learning perform worse - ‘choking’ - focus too much on explicit knowledge and what they’re doing that disrupts automaticity of the skill

23
Q

Describe Weldon and roediger repitition priming

A

Processing of stimuli facilitated by previous recent exposure to the stimulus

  1. Pps study list of words and pics
  2. Explicit - free conscious recall
    Implicit - fragment complete room rest and told to guess words - some corresponded to studied words, some to the names of studied pics and some new
24
Q

Results of weldon and roediger repitition priming

A

Free recall - Pictures recalled better than words ‘picture superiority effect’

Implicit frag completion - better on words than pictures

25
Tulving schacter and stark | Retention interval
Pps given 96 words Tested 1 hour and 1 week later Test: Recognition test (explicit) Word frag completion test - how often complete with words prev seen (implicit)
26
Results Tulving schacter and stark
Recog memory worse in word frag No decline in performance for implicit between 1 and 7 days
27
Mitchell 2006 retention interval experiments
'82 Shown pics of objects for 1-3 secs then recog test for objects (explicit) '99 Mail fragments of Pics to same participants and ask to name - 24.7% recall correct after 17 years, control 5.2% - implicit rigid and occur even whe no conscious recollection of taking part in exp
28
Levels of processing and explicit/implicit
Explicit test influenced by level of processing at study and implicit not
29
Describe Jacoby and Dallas 1981 levels of processing explicit/implicit
Presented pps with list of familiar words Study semantic or not Explicit recognition test Implicit perceptual identification test - word briefly flash on screen and have to identify the word
30
Results of jacoby and Dallas levels of processing explicit/implicit
Recognition memory better for semantic than non No diff in perceptual identification - More likely identify words seen on list before but same for both level conditions
31
Dividing attention for implicit memory tests
Implicit test performance less affected by divided attention than explicit
32
Milligan and Hartman dividing attention on implicit
Pps presented with list of words told to read aloud and remember for later Half pps perform digit monitoring task at same time (tap table when hear 3 consecutive odd digits) Implicit word frag test Explicit word frag cued recall(same frag but told to recall study words to complete them)
33
Results mulligan and Hartman dividing attention on implicit memory
Priming on word frag completion not disrupted by dividing attention Word frag recall was
34
Neuro imaging evidence | Schacter et al
Pps study familiar words Pet scan while: Implicit stem completion test (complete word with first word that comes to mind - both prev seen or not) Baseline stems (only use new words not prev seen) Explicit stem completion (complete using only prev seen)
35
Results schacter et al neuro imaging evidence
Explicit stem: Acid age right parahippocampal formation compared to baseline Implicit stem: Decreased activation in extrastriatal occipital cortex compared to baseline
36
Multiple memory systems theory of implicit and explicit memory
System responsible for conscious recollection Functionally and anatomically distinct from other learning systems Ie selective impairment in explicit memory for amnesiacs but not implicit
37
Multiple memory processes theory of implicit and explicit memory
Memory tests use diff processes | Dissociation a between tests reflect different processes (conceptual vs perceptual)
38
Classical conditioning eye blink tests
Tone presented shortly before luff of air to eye lead to eye blink Tone lead to eye blink - intact with amnesia patients with bilateral medial-temp lesions - absent in patients with cerebellum lesions (motor) - impaired in korsakoff (cerebellum damage) CEREBELLUM STORAGE OF MEMORY TRACE FOR PROCEDURAL MEMORY
39
Classical conditioning fear conditioning in rats
Pair sound web shock leads to fear to sound - Amygdala role in fear conditioning Humans pair stimulus to aversive noise that leads to GSR/SCR - amygdala resection patients show little/no fear
40
Havituation
Rapid stimulus presentation = rapid habituation Weak stimulus = rapid habituation Withheld stimulus = spontaneous recovery