psych 241 midterm 2 Flashcards
who is leon festinger
He was interested in the concepts of deeply held beliefs by people. So he joined a cult. The result was after an (magnificent) event there were urgent covert, the disconfirmation led to increased conviction
what is disconfirmation conviction
According to Festinger disconfirmation conviction is a firm belief held with conviction with theses characteristics
- high initial conviction and strong link to action
-high commitment
- specific and real world based belief
-disconfirmation is recognized
-social support
what is cognitive dissonance theory
According to Festinger, Dissonance is when people experience inconsistency in their thoughts, feelings, and action creating an unpleasant emotional states. To reduce the dissonance they rationalize their action or change their attitude to create greater consistency
ex: binging while on a diet than rationalizing with saying it is your cheat day
how do people reduce dissonance and rationalize their action using various strategies
- changing their attitude/ cognition ex: I don’t need to be on a diet
- changing perception of the action ex: i hardly ate any dessert
- adding consonant cognition ex: this dessert was actually quite nutritious
-minimizing the importance of the conflict ex: i don’t care if i am overweight since life is too short - reducing perceived choice ex: i had no choice, this dessert was served for a special occasion
what are the methods of dissonance induction
- induced compliance
- free choice
- effort justification
- induced hypocrisy
what is induced compliance
when an individual with upper power makes you complete a task that goes against your personal attitude or belief ex: usually a boring task
The study that corresponds with this concept is - the study that correspond with this concept is a group were given a boring task to complete. the experimental group were told to tell another participant the task were interesting and the the control weren’t given an instruction to pass on. some participant offered a dollar for lying to the next participant while others offered twenty dollar for doing so. then they were to evaluate their study experiences
- the people that were paid more money for the completion didn’t have a cognitive dissonance so they could justify lying. the people that weren’t paid well experienced cognitive dissonance, so they began to think the tasks is more interesting than what they think originally
The classical dissonance experiment concluded that dissonance is created if we say something we don’t believe with little justification. dissonance leads to attitude and cognition change
what is free choice
it is a choice between two equally attractive options arousing dissonance
So people reduce their dissonance by making decision of the positive aspect of the reject alternative to increase their liking for the chosen item and negative aspect of the chosen alternative to decrease their liking for the reject item
the study that corresponds with this concept is women asked to give a choice between two equally favourable items . The result was the women convinced themselves that the appliance they selected was better than they initially thought and the rejected option was not great after all
This can apply to choice for political candidates, vacation, restaurants and more, they distort subsequent information to support their decision
what is effort justification
it is engaging in negative behavior for a desirable outcome.in other words, it is believing an action is bad while doing it produce cognitive dissonance
ex: paying a high price for something that turns out to be disappointing
the study that corresponds with this concept is the study experiment had a group read very obscene and detailed sex scene and the other group didn’t read a detailed sex scene but read a material that is related to sex. Then were made to listen to very boring material. The result were the group that were given the most detailed sex scene described the boring material has interesting. This group placed more value on the boring material to justify the extra effort to avoid cognitive dissonance
in effort justification, people experience cognitive dissonance when they struggle to get something to be disappointed by it. To reduce their dissonance they change their cognition. This can help during difficult initiation rites, religious organizations through money and time and more. it can be described as a resource justification
what is induced hypocrisy
it is when an individual advocates for a belief then fails to uphold the belief. we all live with some sort of hypocrisy
The dissonance cognitions are not readily noticeable at the same time, but the hypocrisy paradigm will show it
the study that corresponds with this study This can be seen when a student gave a speech on the importance of condom use, and after didn’t use condom, it can create dissonance. To reduce dissonance there will be an increase of the buying of condom and condom use intention
when do people feel dissonance primarily
- when the inconsistent cognitions are noticeable/important
- highly accessible to consciousness
when does inconsistency produce dissonance
- dissonance is likely when it conflicts with an individual core sense of self. ex: people think of themselves as good and moral beings so when it goes against this belief, dissonance is created
- dissonance is likely when there are foreseeable negative consequences for our actions ex: student
what does aroused dissonance level depend on
- weak external justification
-perceived choice - commitment
- cultural influences
what is self-perception theory
when internal cues are difficult to interpret, people gain insight by observing their own behavior
what is the key differences between dissonance and self-perception
the key difference is the uncomfortable arousal involved in dissonance. if it is self-perception, misattribution should have no impact
The study corresponding to this was that students were told to give a essay then were given a placebo pill and examined their attitude change
People experience attitude change to high choice because they experienced aversive effect
what is misattribution of arousal
it is the process whereby people make a mistake in assuming what is causing them to feel aroused
ex: when an individual faces a physiological response related to fear, people mislabel those responses as romantic arousal.
what is the brain area associated to dissonance
when making difficult choices, the Dorsal ACC is related (conflict). during emotional arousal anterior insula is related
what heightens dissonance
self-relevance heightened dissonance. we are driven to see ourselves as valuable, to bolster our self-esteem and to defend our positive view of ourselves. we are driven to appear competent and worthy to
what is the positive illusion about self
we see ourselves through a rose colored glass
we turn our attention away from negative outcomes and stimuli toward goals
The three types of illusion are self, control, optimism. if there is an error, it can be adaptive in the belief in ability to pursue a goal, belief that environment supports the goal, belief that goal is attainable
a positive illusion about protecting an individual from adversity, it is a psychological protection. However positive illusion can lead to chronic pattern of self defeating behavior
what are ways of maintaining positive illusions
- self-handicapping
- social comparison
what is self-handicapping
self-handicapping is behavior designed to sabotage one’s own performance in order to provide a subsequent excuse for failure
people engage in self-handicapping to provide an explanation for failure and way of protecting themselves due to a lack of ability
what is sandbagging
a form of self-handicapping. it is when an individual downplays their own ability, lowering expectation or openly predicting failure. even though it is a way to protect yourself, it can have a negative impact on performance. also others tend not to like people engaging in self-handicapping
what is social comparisons
we learn about our own abilities and attitude by comparing ourselves to other people who are similar on important attributes or dimensions
we compare ourselves to others when there is no objective standard
there are two types of social comparison
what is upward social comparisons
it is when an individual compares themselves with someone who is better. this can make us feel worse or inspire us
what is downward social comparisons
it is when an individual compares themselves to someone worse, making us feel better. after a tragic event we tend to afflict ourselves with someone in the same situation but we are adjusting well and compare ourselves to someone worse