Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

AQA A-Level Psychology > Section 1 : Social Influence - Obedience To Authority > Flashcards

Section 1 : Social Influence - Obedience To Authority Flashcards

1
Q

What is obedience

A

Acting in response to a direct order, usually from an authority figure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who studied obedience

A

Milgram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What type of experiment were Milgram’s studies on obedience

A

Laboratory experiments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How many participants were there and what gender

A

40 Male participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did the experimenter (confederate) wear

A

A grey lab coat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How was it decided for ‘teacher’ and ‘learner’

A

Participants were introduced to confederate. They drew lots but this was fixed so participators were always the teacher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did the participants watch happen to the learner

A

They watched them get strapped to the chair and shock generator. Shock generator didn’t give actual shocks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did the switches range from

A

15 labels from ‘Slightly Shocked’ to ‘XXX’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did the teacher (participators) and learners (confederates) actually have to do

A

Participants taught the learner word-pairs over an intercom. When the learner answer incorrectly the participant administered and increasing level of shock.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

After what voltage did the learner (confederate) stop responding

A

300V - learner pounded on the wall and gave no further responses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What happened if participants hesitated to give shocks

A

The experimenter told them to continue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What happened in the debriefing

A

It included an interview, questionnaires and reunited the learner (confederate) with the participant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were the results of the experiment

A

-26 Participants administered 450V
-None stopped before administering 300V
-Most participants showed signs of stress e.g. sweating, groaning and trembling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the conclusion of Milgram’s study on obedience to authority

A

Ordinary people will obey orders to hurt someone else, even if it means acting against their conscience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

did milgram’s experiment hold internal validty

A

it is possible that the participants didn’t believe they were inflicting electric shocks but Milgram claimed that participants stressed reactions showed they believed the experiment was real

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

did milgram’s experiment hold ecological validity

A

Milgram’s participants did a task that they were unlikely to encounter in real life, meaning the study lacks ecological validity. But, it was a lab experiment meaning there was good control of variables so it is possible to establish cause and effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what ethical issues might’ve come up with this experiment

A

negatives:
-participants were deceived
-couldn’t give informed consent
-weren’t informed of their right to withdraw (prompted to continue when participants wanted to stop)
-participants weren’t protected as they showed signs of stress

positives:
-participants were debriefed after experiment (84% said they pleased in taking part)
-at the time of experiment there weren’t any formal ethical guidelines meaning technically milgram didn’t break any

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what situational factors might’ve affected obedience

A

presence of allies
proximity of victim
proximity of authority
location of experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

did the presence of allies affect obedience - how did milgram show this

A

yes - having allies makes it easier to resist orders. when there were 3 teachers (1 participant and 2 confederates, the real participant was less likely to obey if the two others refused to obey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

did the proximity of the victim affect obedience

A

Milgram’s Research suggests an important factor was the proximity of the learner. Obedience dropped to 40% with the learner in the same room and 30% when the participant had to put the learners hand on the shock plate. Proximity made learners suffering harder to ignore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Did the proximity of authority have an affect on obedience

A

Obedience dropped to 23% when the authority figure gave prompts by phone from another room. When the authority figure wasn’t close orders were easier to resist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Did the location of the experiment affect obedience

A

Participants that gave maximum shock fell to 48% after being told the study was being run by a private company in run down offices in a nearby town. When the association with a prestigious university (Yale) was removed the authority if the experimenter seemed less legitimate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What theory made by Milgram explains obedience

A

Milgram’s agency theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is an Agentic state

A

When someone acts as someone’s agent, rather than taking personal responsibility for their actions

25
Q

When is someone said to be in the Agentic state

A

When people behave on the behalf of an external authority (do as they are told)

26
Q

What is the opposite of behaving on the behalf of an external authority

A

The opposite is behaving autonomously

27
Q

What does autonomous mean

A

Not following orders

28
Q

What did Milgram’s agency theory state

A

Stated that when we feel we’re acting out the wishes of another person (being their agent), we feel less responsible for our actions

29
Q

Where was the effect of Milgram’s agency theory seen in his research

A

When some participants were concerned for the welfare of the learner and asked who would take responsibility is the learner was harmed. When the experimenter (authority) took responsibility, often the participant would continue

30
Q

What was the Agentic state encouraged by

A

The set up of the experiment. The participants voluntarily entered a social contract with the experimenter to take part and follow the procedure of the study

31
Q

What is the Agentic shift

A

When people can start off acting in an autonomous way (thinking for themselves) by then become obedient

32
Q

How did Milgram’s participants undergo an Agentic shift

A

When participants arrived for the experiment they were in an autonomous state but as soon as they started following orders they underwent an agentic shift and entered and agentic state

33
Q

What were the binding factors that Milgram claimed that might’ve kept his participants in the Agentic state

A

-Reluctance to disrupt the experiment
-Pressure of the surroundings
-The insistences of the authority figure

34
Q

What was meant by the binding factor reluctance to disrupt the experiment

A

Participants had already been paid so many have felt obliged to continue

35
Q

What was meant by the binding factor of pressure of the surroundings

A

The experiment took place in a prestigious university. This made the experimenter seem like a leg image authority

36
Q

What was meant by the factor insistence of the authority figure

A

If participants hesitated they were told that they had to continue the experiment

37
Q

What is Milgram’s agency theory supported by

A

His results

38
Q

What did Milgram believe before his studies

A

He believed people were autonomous and could choose to resist authority

39
Q

Give the 2 evaluations of Milgram’s agency theory

A

-There’s lots of experimental evidence to support it, participants often claimed they wouldn’t gone as far by themselves, but they were following orders
-Sometimes people resist the pressure to obey authority. Agency theory doesn’t explain why some people are more likely to exhibit independent behaviour than others

40
Q

Why might some people resist pressure to obey authority

A

Could be because of the situation or because of individual differences

41
Q

What can obedience depend on

A

Legitimacy of authority

42
Q

What are legitimate authorities given

A

The right to tell us what to do - meaning we are more likely to obey them

43
Q

Where do legitimate authorities come from

A

Having a defined social role which people respect (police officers and parents) usually because it implies knowledge or comes with from legal power

44
Q

How did legitimacy of authority link to Milgram’s research

A

Obedience rate decreased when the experiment was done in the run down offices than in the prestigious Yale university - Milgram argued that the experimenters authority was higher in the university because of the status of the university

45
Q

What was Bickman (1974)

A

A field experiment where researchers ordered passers-by to do something like pick up a bit of litter etc. they were dressed in a guards uniform, as a milkman or in smart clothes.

46
Q

What were the results of Bickman 1974

A

People were much more likely to obey the person in a guards uniform

47
Q

Why in Bickman 1974 did people more likely obey the guard

A

Because he seemed to be the most legitimate authority figure

48
Q

What type of personality can explain obedience

A

Authoritarian

49
Q

What theory is a dispositional explanation of obedience

A

Adorno’s theory of the authoritarian personality

50
Q

What did Adorno et al (1950) propose

A

Over-strict parenting results in a child being socialised to obey authority unquestioningly because they learn strict obedience to their parents

51
Q

What did Adorno say over strict parenting results in

A

Prejudice - strict parenting makes child feel constrained, this induces aggression. But if the child is afraid they’ll be disciplined if they express aggression towards their parents so instead they are hostile to people they see as weak or inferior - usually minority groups

52
Q

What collection of traits to people who has over-strict parent have according to Adorno et al

A

Aggression to people of perceived lower status
Blind obedience
Conformist
Rigid moral standards

53
Q

What scale measures how strongly people express authoritarian traits

A

F-Scale

54
Q

What does the f in f-scale stand for

A

Fascism

55
Q

What did Elms and Milgram (1966) find about participants who scored higher on the F-Scale

A

They found that people with high F-scale scores had been willing to administer bigger shocks in Milgram’s experiment

56
Q

What factors cause people to be obedient

A

Strict upbringing
Having authoritarian traits
Education
Etc.

57
Q

What did Milgram find that had a bigger effect on obedience than Adorno’s authoritarian personality theory

A

Milgram found that situational factors like proximity and location had a bigger effect on obedience

58
Q

What does Adorno’s authoritarian personality theory not explain

A

Doesn’t explain how whole societies can become obedient - not everybody has this personality type

AQA A-Level Psychology (34 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions