Self and Reactance Theories Flashcards
(17 cards)
Lewin’s Theory
- dynamic forces
- potential need –> actual need –> tension
- tension continues until goal is acquired
- Zeigernik - tasks interrupted before completion are recalled better
Symbolic Self Completion Theory
- commitment to self-defining goals (smart, kind etc)
- symbols of completeness
- indicates someone acquiring an aspired definition
- symbols that show they completed self-defining goal
- social reality - recognition of achievement
Speech patterns and social class
upper class uses less complex language compared to middle class, because they’re already where they want to be
in academic web pages and email signatures
- use symbol of attainment (signature, professional titles at the end of an email) to define tendencies to communicate their accomplishments to others
Academic Web pages and email signatures displaying symbolic self-completion theory
study 1
- academic departments with lower NRC rankings listed more professional titles on their web pages compared to departments with higher rankings
study 2,3
professors with lower citations/publications displayed more professional titles in email signatures compared to higher professors
results on completeness indicators
- low completeness highest in committed group to want to become successful on scale of desire to influence
- on symbol displays, highly committed but low completeness
- incomplete person’s self-descriptions may reflect efforts to gain completness
Commitment to motherhood after seeing other mothers
picked females committed to goal of raising family
- they described the motherly abilities of others
- were asked to provide feedback using descriptions, one comments with self-descriptive answers, other without
shown ideal mother personality profile
- asked to complete questionnaire for self
subjects who received a measure of completeness (actual social reality) had less reason to self-symbolise than those others
- incompleteness led to propensity to characterise self as similar to expert
self-schemas
- actual self
- ideal self
- ought self - obligations, responsibilities
standpoints
- own
- significant other, spouse, parent, friend
motivation assumptions
motivated to have actual self match relevant self-guides
- relations among different selves, cause diff emotions
negative affect
actual vs self gone wrong
- dejection related: sad
- actual vs ought, presence of negative (agitation)
two hypotheses for negative affect
hypothesis 1
- greater magnitude of a self-discrepancy, the greater the emotion
hypothesis 2
- greater accessibility of discrepancy, the more emotion associated
self-evaluation maintenance - abraham tesser
one’s self concept can be threatened by the behaviour of another individual. but, this is determined by:
a) performance feedback
b) closeness of individual
c) relevance of behaviour
however, if it is not a self-relevant domain (something unimportant to you) then you can appreciate it in the other person
- if it is self relevant then you might feel threatened and:
- distance self from the other
- redefine task relevance (undermine its importance)
psychological reactance theory
motivational state generated by threatened or actual blocking of specific expected free behaviour
- motivates one to restore freedom
psychological reactance theory applied to interpersonal attraction
correlational
- reported parental interference with relationship correlated positively with romantic love
- for both married and unmarried
Pennebaker et al. (psychological reactance applied to interpersonal attraction)
freedom to meet members of opposite sex would be threatened as closing got closer
- 3 bars
- rated attractiveness
- opposite attractiveness became more attractive as close time approached, while ratings of same sex did not change
- possibility of alcoholic intoxication for some participants, extraneous variable
Wickland & Ogbulen
females expecting 5 men after reading questionnaires completed by them
- told they could choose or would be assigned man, rate man
- told that one would not show and one would be late, rate again
when expected choice was threatened, attraction was greater
Variables that influence magnitude of reactance
- strength of threat
- attractiveness of expected toy increased for those who were severely threatened, decreased for those mildly threatened
- expectation of freedom
- some could choose albums, some couldn’t, then rated albums
when people expected choice, and freedom eliminated, ratings are more positive
- importance of freedom
- more important freedom, greater reactance
- number and proportion of freedoms threatened
- magnitude of reactance increases as proportion of threat increases