Studies Ch 5-7 Flashcards

1
Q

Eberhardt, Parrott, & Sprunger (2015)

A
  1. demonstrates modern racism
  2. Study about children misbehaving and assigning punishments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Steele & Aronson (1995)

A
  1. Demonstrates stereotype threat
  2. Students took exact same verbal SAT test, one named “intelligence test” or “problem-solving task unrelated to ability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Fein & Spencer (1997)

A
  1. Demonstrates prejudice as self-image maintenance
  2. Popular negative stereotype of the “Jewish American Princess”, given a test and positive or negative feedback.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Morrongelio & Dawber (2000)

A
  1. Demonstrates double standards
  2. Parents watch videos of children engaging in risky behaviors on playground
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Muzafer Sherif – Robbers Park Experiment

A
  1. Demonstrates in-group and out-group behaviors
  2. Two separate groups of boys either “Rattlers” vs. “Eagles”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Andrew Davidson & James Jaccard (1979)

A
  1. Demonstrates prediction of behavior based on attitude
  2. Use attitudes to predict whether women would use birth control pills within the next two years
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ajzen & Fishbein (1977)

A
  1. Demonstrates prediction of behavior based on attitude
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Richard Petty & Others (1981)

A
  1. Demonstrates how audience interprets information
  2. Audience responses to specific elements, like timing of policy implementation, amount of credibility, and involvement of audience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Kelman & Hovland (1953)

A
  1. Demonstrates sleeper effect & discounting cue hypothesis
  2. Participants given two message from a high-credibility and low-credibility source
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Miller & Campbell (1959)

A
  1. Demonstrates influence of primacy and recency effect
  2. Participants instructed to read two cases and make a decision one week later
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Carlsmith & Festinger (1959)

A
  1. Demonstrates justification related to discrepancies
  2. Participants watch a movie, then placed into three groups. (1) lie for $1 (2) lie for $20 (3) no lie
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Muzafer Sherif (1936)

A
  1. Demonstrates informational influence and private conformity
  2. Participants placed in a dark room, estimate how far away a visible light is then placed into groups of 3
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Soloman Asch (1951)

A
  1. Demonstrates normative social influence and public conformity
  2. Participants were placed in a room with 5 confederates and were asked to match lines
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Burger (2009)

A
  1. Demonstrates Obedience, an extension to Milgram’s study
  2. Stopped at 150 mv and added defiant confederate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Regan (1971)

A
  1. Demonstrates Norm of Reciprocity
  2. Two people waiting for a study, confederate gets something to drink, offers coke. Then sold raffle tickets
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Moscovici & Others (1969)

A
  1. Demonstrates minority influence
  2. Modified Asch’s design
17
Q

Piccoli et al (2020)

A
  1. Demonstrates normative social influence
  2. Surveyed over 3500 high school students in Italy about cyberbullying
18
Q

Cesario & Higgins (2008)

A
  1. demonstrates regulatory fit
19
Q

Snyder & DeBono (1985)

A
  1. Demonstrates self-monitoring
  2. Surveyed participants to evaluate ads
20
Q

De Hoog & others (2007)

A
  1. demonstrates fear tactic messaging
  2. meta-analysis of 105 studies, determined messages do not need to be gruesome
21
Q

Edwards & Smith (1996)

A
  1. Demonstrates message discrepancies
  2. Measured attitudes on hot topic issues, read arguments either consistent or inconsistent with attitudes