Unit 1 Introduction to and overview of behavior reduction and replacement Flashcards

(91 cards)

1
Q

Conducted by graduates from behavioral EXPERIMENTAL psychology programs (EAB) and NOT clinical psychology or special education programs

A

Behavior modification/management (Early days/pioneers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

• went beyond the box: from the lab to real life

•Worked in:
MENTAL hospitals

developmental centers

 prisons, 

 SCHOOLS

 community 
              •Cf., Alexander Rutherford 2009
A

Skinner’s Students and other EAB trained persons. 1950s to 1960s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Nate Azrim, Ted AYLLON

Sid Bijou, Don Baer, Mont Wolf and Todd RIsley

Harold Cohen and James Filipczak

Charles Ferster

Scott GELLER

Israel Goldiamond

Fred KELLER

Og Lindsley

A

Some of the pioneers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Use methods of EXPERIMENTAL analysis of behavior to figure out what to do and to EVALUATE the effectiveness of their procedures

Their solid grounding in the PRINCIPLES of operant and respondent LEARNING made them excellent problem solvers

ABA formalized in 1968 due to their work

A

Pioneers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In the early days Began calling aba providers because:

A

POPULATIONS that Many psychologists did not want or could not be effective with Such as severe MR, severe autism, schizophrenia.

PLACES We are many psychologist did not want to work such as institutions, presence

For cases others had tried but FAILED (The deep end cases

The referral sources wanted us to do behavior management rather than doing therapy or teaching skills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Began because

many ”behavior modifiers” needed to work in institutions.

many needed to transition persons out of the institutions during the deinstitutionalization movement.

Not enough PhD’s trained in EAB to go solve problems

Others that were not as well trained began to feel the need

A

Drift to behavior modification and behavior management

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

As early as the 1960s, the behavior modifiers begin to use what we now call a..,

A

Topography – based approach to behavior reduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A general term for working on all types of target behavior

A

Behavior modification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Usually referred to working on a problem behavior

A

Behavior management

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Due to pressure from human rights advocate for the banning of aversive and restricted procedures and,…

Due to the work of a new generation of applied researchers starting in the late 1970s and blossoming in the 1990s

A

The function based approach took hold

ABA resurfaces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Severe problem behavior
(as research and practice focused on treatment of severe problem behavior),

Challenging behavior

MALADAPTIVE behavior

Behavior EXCESSES

Behavior problems

A

5 Other terms for problem behavior

Behavior modification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

May MINIMIZE a persons attainment of MEANINGFUL outcomes in there community

May minimize ACCESS to short term and long term reinforcers

May maximize the likelihood of contacting natural and social PUNISHERS

May result in RESTRICTED access to the community

A

Problem Behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Cookbook approach

Topography-based

Technologist

Procedures at its core

A

Behavior modification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Individualized

Function -based

Analysts

Basic principles at its core

A

Behavior analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Is the behavior;

  1. criminal/illegal?

Life-threatening to self or others?

Harmful/dangerous to self or others

Damaging property or materials?

Likely to become severe or serious?

Of great concern to caregiver us?

•Interfering with access to, participation in, or acceptance in the community?
Living, schooling, working, recreating?
• Interfering with social relations?
Family relations, friendships, love life, etc.
• negative impact on performance in school or work?

A

9 Questions to ask yourself regarding behavior/problem behavior

Some of the questions are from the “subjective assessment of problem behavior scale”, by Evans and Meyer Some of the questions were modified

“An educated approach to behavior problems.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Rate- too high

I RT - too short

Duration - too long

Severity – too high or intensity -too intense

Wrong place, situation, or time

A

Some parameters of problem behavior related to behavior reduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Criminal or other illegal behavior. May result in incarceration or death penalty. Such as murder, rape, child molestation, theft, embezzlement, fraud

Harmful/dangerous behavior. Such as suicide, SIB, Pica, substance-abuse, DUI, physical aggression

Property destruction such as fire setting, vandalism, braking items, punching holes in the wall

Stereotypic and ritualistic behavior. Such as hand flapping, body rocking, vocal stereotypies , lining up objects

Bizzarre verbal behavior a.k.a., psychotic speech. Such as talking to self, delusional talk

A

Some general types of examples of problem behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Behavior reduction procedures

Decelerative or decel procedures

Abative procedures

Contingency braking procedures

Replacement procedures
•.Reducing behavior is not solely accomplished by using punishment or extinction

A

Some general terms for procedures for problem behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Procedures at its core

A

Behavior Modification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Basic principles at its core

A

Behavior analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q
  1. used methods of EXPERIMENTAL analysis of behavior to figure out what to do and to EVALUATE the effectiveness of their procedures
  2. Their solid grounding in the PRINCIPLES of operant and respondent LEARNING made them excellent problem solvers
A

Pioneers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

, the common approach to problem behavior was to treat it based on ‘Topography based treatment model

A

In early days of ABA, 1960s to t1980s

‘-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Example: if the problem is SIB use X procedure is, but if it is physical aggression against others use Y procedures

A

Topography-based treatment model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Use the most POWERFUL reinforcers available to reinforce the absence of the problem behavior and/or the occurrence of INCOMPATIBLE and/or Appropriate behavior

Use the most powerful punishers as a consequence for occurrence of problem behavior or it’s Precursors

A

Topography base model: common procedure is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Used as a cookbook approach and a one size fits all approach There was a TECHNOLOGICAL drift and analysis was forgotten
Topography-based model
26
Resulted in: DRO as the most common type of reinforcement procedure Artificial and many times unhealthy reinforcers. E.g., candy, cigarettes etc. Highly aversive and restricted consequences for problem behavior Eg., contingent electro-faradic Shock, water misting, bad smells, bad tasting substances, overcorrection, required relaxation, seclusion time out, restraints
Topography base model resulted in the proliferation of these
27
Behavior targeted to increase, if any: •.”DEAD PERSON”behavior; Staff handing M&Ms for quiet sitting. -Good being quiet, good sitting, good quiet hands • Compliance
Topography base model
28
The actual reinforcer is maintaining the problem behavior were not withheld contingent upon problem behavior you are used to increase replacement behavior. E.g., timeout used for aggression even if the behavior was maintain by Social negative reinforcement Contingent relations between the problem behavior were not broken. Instead, problem behavior was suppressed under tight stimulus control Changes in behavior failed to maintain and generalize
Limitations- Topography Based Model
29
All inappropriate behavior that was not SIB had time out as a consequence for all students The type of time out was based on the topography of the behavior. Criteria for ending time out was unbelievable DRO most common procedure to decrease problem behavior other than restrictive/aversive consequences
Example of topography-based model. And the actual contingency relationship between problem behavior not being broken.
30
This procedure does not really reinforce alternative appropriate behavior Is either a punishment based procedure or, at best, a procedure to reinforce dead person behavior.
DRO Often used in topography-based model
31
The Target incompatible behavior typically was not functional such as hands on lap; hands behind back. The reinforce I was artificial and not maintaining consequences for a problem behavior. Reinforcement schedules were thin and not followed correctly
When DRI’s used During topography model – early days.
32
The target “ALTERNATIVE”. behavior typically benefited the caregiver and not the client. Such as compliance, “Dead-person” behavior. Sometimes self-care skills were used that would never be in the same response class as real replacement behavior Same problem with reinforcers and schedule as DRI’s
When DRA used to during early. – Topography base model
33
1. “Communicative “Function” of Problem behavior” and the ”FUNCTIONAL” Assessment Movement Ted Carr 2. The “Functional” Analysis or Experimental Analysis Movement • Iwata and colleagues
Function-based Treatment Model- Two key developments
34
1. Functional descriptive assessment 2. “Functional” “Communication” training and replacement behavior 3. Different consequences and other treatment procedures for different “functions” of behavior. Such as extinction for “behavior“ maintained 4. Proliferation of antecedent interventions. 5. Punishment based and other restrictive or aversive interventions used to minimally or not at all 6. Positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS)
Components of: Communicative Function of Problem Behavior Function Based treatment model
35
Brian Iwata And his discovery of functional analysis and of developing function based treatment protocols for severe problem behavior. Eg. SIB Maintained by Social positive reinforcement versus by Social negative reinforcement, versus automatic positive and automatic negative
The Functional Analysis Movement
36
Thousands of ABA research studies have demonstrated unprecedented success of function based treatment in thousands of cases Aversive/restrictive interventions seldom used
Superiority of function based model
37
Most research studies have been done with persons with severe autism or severe to profound developmental disabilities. Practitioners sometimes target incorrect replacement behavior
Some limitations to functional approach
38
Evidence-based practice shown to reduce problem behavior by replacing it with appropriate communication that is reinforced with the same consequence that maintains the problem behavior
Functional Communication Training
39
Conduct functional assessment or functional analysis so as to identify: Maintaining consequences for the problem behavior and Antecedent switch evoke a problem behavior
FCT Stage 1
40
Train and differentially reinforce for socially acceptable communicative response • Reinforcement of the communicative response should be the same as the maintaining consequence for the problem behavior • The communicative response should be low in effort in quickly and consistently reinforce • The contingency between the problem behavior should be broken. Eg.,. Behavior placed on extension
FCT – Stage 2
41
Transfer control across real life settings and significant persons * Carr and Durand (1985) Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. * Tiger, Hanley, Bruzek 2008. Functional communication training: A review and practical guide
FCT – Stage 3
42
A differential reinforcement procedure, problem behavior is placed on extinction An alternative response is strengthened. The alternative response results in the same reinforcement that maintains the problem behavior and is a recognizable form of communication. A CRF Schedule is used initially, thin later
FCT
43
Why talk about FCT in a behavior reduction chorus?
Remember the fair-pair rule: We decrease problem behavior by teaching an alternative response
44
1. Functional analysis 2. Teaching an alternative communicative response 3. Extending FCT across settings/caregivers
Three stages of FCT
45
1. Identify the reinforcer using a functional analysis.
Guidelines Developing FCT interventions- Guidelines
46
Response effort Social recognition of the responses Likely speed of response acquisition
Selecting communicative response topography: factors to consider-FCT
47
Communicative response should be less effortful then the problem behavior Topography -based responses may be easier for those with DVD two acquire Selection based responses may be easier to shape and faster to acquire
1. Response Effort- Selecting response topography factors to consider FCT
48
Select response topographies that will be reinforced even by those unfamiliar with the clients program Avoid arbitrary gestures Consider communication forms that clearly identify the reinforcer
2. Social recognition of the response. Selecting response topography factors to consider -FCT
49
Select easy responses first Consider responses already in the repertoire. ( Remember task J-05) Reserve more complex response forms after problem behavior has been reduced
3. Likely speed of response acquisition: Selecting response topography factors to consider - FCT
50
Consider the initial teaching conditions: • experts versus caregiver Initial training buy highly trained individuals • Highly controlled setting versus natural environment -Conduct in environment where reinforcers can be controlled and people/things protected Promote generalization
Who should implement and WHERE should they implement it? Implementing FCT
51
1. When considering expert versus caregivers for training purposes of FCT, the initial training should be done by
A highly trained individual.
52
1. Incorporate multiple trainers and settings 2. Include likes stimuli 3. Sequential modification
Implementing FCT: strategies for promoting generalization
53
-Use contrived differences vs natural establishing operations . • Will have Accelerated ACQUISITION due to more opportunities . • But may limit.... generalization Consider using .... • least to most fading (time delay procedure) • Most to least prompting •Seek to transfer control from prompts to the motivating operation •prompting and prompt fading tactics
Teaching the Communicative Response ....
54
• Extinction : most effective when extinction is utilized Consider continued reinforcement of problem behavior if : •!influencer cannot be controlled; • withholding reinforcer may be dangerous ``` If not using extinction, reinforcement for communicative response should be •Longer in duration , •more immediate • greater quality • higher rate. ``` If extinction alone is not effective consider • ••punishment of problem behavior. Extinction and punishment together for a problem behavior 
Selecting consequences for problem behavior- FCT
55
*Schedule thinning- Reinforcement Thinned for Communicative Responding * .Start FCT on CRF “schedule” for communicative response * Intro time delay between communicative response and “reinforcement” but watch for... Plan for reemergence of Problem behavior • continue exposure to extinction • provide other preferred stimuli during extinctions conditions or delayed intervals •punishment during extinction •Consider establishing stimulus control of the communicative response ¥Reinforcement and extinction periods correlated with distinct SD
EXTINCTION of communicative RESPONSE. FCT
56
1. Conduct a functional analysis to identify the reInforcer of maintaining problem behavior 2. Select a communication response that is recognizable and can be quickly required 3. Identify trained individuals to initiate FCT in a safe, controlled environment 4. Arrange multiple opportunities to prompt and reinforce communication response to promote rapid acquisition 5. Teach communicative response using most to least or least- to- most prompting procedures, reinforce every instance of the response. 6. Withhold reinforcement for problem behavior and when necessary arrange punishers
When beginning FCT
57
1. Thin schedule of reinforcement for the communication response by either delaying reinforcer delivery or teaching the client to recognize Once problem behaviors are produced in control situations** 2. Implement strategies to promote generalization by incorporating multiple trainers or settings into training including stimuli from the generalization setting, and conduct training in all situations or times when reinforcement is not available for the response 3. Teach caregiver to respond to communicative and problem behavior in the RELEVANT CONTEXTS. 4. Arrange learning ”situations”Naturals environment 5. Increase the complexity of the communicative response overtime
FCT ... .... ....
58
1. Many times in FCT, the Mands taught and Reinforced are… | 2. Mand training is more specific and leads to results in a larger speaker…
1. Very limited and are usually broad categories. Such as a break for behavior maintain by escape 2. Repertoire
59
1. Is our subject matter behavior alone? 2. Are the functions of behavior really attention, tangible’s, escape, and automatic reinforcement? 3. Should antecedents have only a first name? 4. Can we really neglect context in our functional analysis and and interventions? 5. Are we effective if we only change behavior?
Five questions
60
Question 1. Is our subject matter behavior alone? No.... 1. Our subject matter encompasses .... 2. Note that and operant or a respondent is not just a behavior or the response, but a...... 3. Behavior does not exist in a vacuum. RESPONSES and STIMULI do not have any
1. ..... operants and respondents., contingencies, functional relations. 2. .... contingent relation 3. .. real EXISTENCE in ISOLATION from each other.
61
There are problems with oversimplifying The function of behavior Two of the seven dimensions of ABA are analytic and conceptually systematic “ but even though one may be able to do good work without talking about it correctly, I can’t help but believe that even better work is possible when verbal practices are not seriously flawed.” Jack Michael
Question # 2 Are the functions of behavior really attention, etc.?
62
Relate in particular to the functions of behavior , contingencies and functional relations. Has practical implications for functional assessment/analysis and function based treatment of challenging behavior
Jose Conceptual analysis
63
“The function of the behavior is attention” The function of the behavior as accessed to tangibles The function of the behavior is escape The function of the behavior is automatic reinforcement
Typical statements about function . The statements are usually oversimplifications
64
1. Based mostly on.... Consequences 2. Fail to take.... Antecedent into account what are you doing 3. Functional relations and real life contingencies are generally much... more complex than we may be tempted to conclude by these 4. Discriminative stimuli and motivating operations are critical parts of the... 5. Even when discussed, antecedents usually are not related to functional relations consequences 6. Failed to take into account: thew environmental context in which the behavior occurs 7. Consequences and antecedents interact with environmental context
Problems with the function is… Statement. (Simple Summary Statements ) ;
65
Simplistic functional statements tend to fail to identify and analyze complex competing contingencies. Subdivision of reinforcement into Social versus automatic is simplistic Proprioceptive stimulation and pain attenuation are not the only types of automatic reinforcement With the exception of attention, other types of socially mediated reinforcement EG., Tangible, activities, escape: can be directly accessed by the person, without Social mediation
(Problem with current classification of functions) ......
66
That reported maintaining consequences (attention, tangible, access to activities, escape) are NOT Specific enough Antecedents are often left out of the analysis of functional relations and/or are not tied to the consequence to which they are functionally related
Conclusion: our current classification of a functions is flawed
67
The following our only first names for antecedents as they do not reference a specific type of consequences: Establishing operation Abolishing operation SD S Delta SDP SDeltaP Antecedents and operant relations are always depended upon their relation to consequences Discriminative stimuli and MO’s Never had an EFax independent of consequences
Question #3: should antecedents have only a first name
68
Can we really neglect context in our functional analysis and an intervention? NO
Question 4
69
** • We need to change real. World Contingencies_or the behavior change will not.. endure or _ GENERALIZE Change in behavior is insignificant if we do not help the person “ achieve meaningful outcomes” .. in the real world
Question #5 Are we EFFECTIVE if we only CHANGE Behavior? No**
70
In it’s every day sense, FUNCTION is what something does and the aim of the doing •This has led to Practitioners using teleological explanations. Example .... he is doing X to get Y In behavior analysis function is used in... its mathematical sense. Skinner 1955 A functional relation is simply a mathematical relation between.... two wor more variables In behavior analysis functional relations are between. ..... stimulus classes (independent variable) and responses classes (Dependent Variable).
Functional Relation .... ....
71
Said to exist when systematic manipulation of members of a stimulus class result in orderly, reliable, and predictable changes in members of a ..... response class, such as those observed when we conduct a functional analysis
Functional Relationship
72
1. Probabilistic – not cause and effect or deterministic 2. Non-linear (cf, non-linear equations in calculus) 3. Complex as they change over time with respect to changing conditions. Eg, context 4. Still enable us to make predictions
Four characteristics of functional relations
73
Exists when one event depends on another Any event that is truly contingent on a Nother only occur as if the other event occurs. For example… Thunder only occurs if there is lightning However, continued relations, typically our weaker than, than if and only if X then Y The dependencies our probabilistic
Contingency
74
1. Have effects on behavior and on functional relations between environmental events and behavior
1. Contingencies
75
• The stronger the contingent relation between a stimulus class and the response class the more probable that we will find an ...
....orderly, reliable, predictable functional relation between the two
76
* , when in a contingency Relation with other stimuli, also have effects on other stimuli. * These other NEUTRAL stimuli probably will have an effect on the response class that were…”Functionally related” to the previously effective stimulus Examples... * The effect of differential consequences on developing discriminative stimuli * The affect of motivating operations and consequences and on discriminative stimuli… * The effect of pairing a reinforcer with a neutral stimulus
Stimuli
77
When functionally related to. Operant Behavior, they are covered by specific terms depending on the specific type Of a relation to RESPONSES and other STIMULI such as CONSEQUENCES These functional relations are established by strong____
Antecedents ....contingencies
78
1. Effects of antecedents are dependent on…..
1. Consequences
79
Basic operant 4 - term contingency
MO - SD - R - SR
80
Derive their effect on behavior due to a past history of differential availability of members of a consequence class contingent on the occurrence of members of a response class
Discriminative Stimuli
81
Derive their effect on behavior due to their establishing or abolishing effect on specific consequences which have reinforced or punished a response class in the past. Last name refers to the consequence whose value is being altered
Motivating operations
82
That last name of each type refers to the type of consequence which lead to the development of that Discriminative stimulus
Eg.,Discriminative stimulus for positive reinforcement. A discriminative stimulus for positive reinforcement, SDR + evokes a response as, in the past, positive reinforcement has followed that response in the presence of that SDR +.
83
If in a descriptive assessment one identifies the CONTEXT(s) under which the problem behavior occurs MOST frequently and the context under which it occurs LEAST frequently, one can make HYPOTHESES about contingencies and functional relations which can be verified EXPERIMENTALLY Then we can solve the problem by manipulating MO’s discriminative stimuli and consequences based on the ACTUAL Contingencies and functional relations We can use evidence-based practices but, instead of using a cookbook approach, we can better Individualized treatment protocols
**Practical implications for assessment and teaching** ... … I
84
Simplistic functional statements tend to fail to identify and analyze Complex competing
.. contingencies
85
The stronger the contingent relationship between two or more Stimulus classes, the more probable that a new functional relationship will develop between a ______. _______. _____. and the RESPONSE CLASS That was previously functionally related to The other stimulus
neutral stimulus class
86
With the exception of attention, other types of socially mediated reinforcement (EG., Tangible, activities, escape) can be directly accessed by the person.....
......Without Social mediation
87
Lead to The development of functional relations but not Vaisa versa
Contingencies
88
2. Operant antecedents never function independently of…
consequences
89
3. The effects of antecedents depend upon their relation to…
Consequences
90
They have last names
Antecedents
91
2. Are established and observed but it would be incorrect to say that a functional relation had an effect
2. Contingencies