Intro
Agree -patronage undermines legitimacy
P- patronage continues to distort the peerage system, reducing public trust.
E- In March 2025, Guardian revealed that members of Lords donated combined £109 million to political parties, with nearly £50 million donated before their appointments. This strongly suggests that peerages are still being used as rewards for political donations, rather than being awarded on merit.
A- This undermines integrity of appointments process and creates the perception that access to legislative power can be bought. Less peerages awarded on merit but political favour.
Counter
Agree democratic deficit and lack of accountability
P- lacks democratic legitimacy due to unelected nature (members are unelected).
E- highlighted in October 2024 when HOL (Hereditary Peers) Bill passed its 2nd reading in the HOC. Aimed to abolish o2 hereditary peers. Bill failed to progress further.
A- fact they still sit in Lords shows the chamber is outdated and resistant to democratic change.
A- deeply supports reforms needed : unelected individuals continue to shape laws w/o public consent.
Remains outdated + reform needed to align with democratic norms.