Week 4 Flashcards

(54 cards)

1
Q

What are the three levels of scientific understanding?

A

Description
Prediction
Control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Description

A

level of scientific understanding

systematic observation enables scientists to describe natural phenomena accurately

yields a collection of facts that can be quantified and classified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

yields a collection of facts that can be quantified and classified

A

Description

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

prediction

A

level of scientific understanding

achieved when repeated observation shows two events consistently covary–correlation

can be used to predict the probability that one even will occur based on the presence of the other event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

can be used to predict the probability that one even will occur based on the presence of the other event

A

prediction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

control

A

level of scientific understanding

highest level of scientific understanding

comes from establishing experimental control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

comes from establishing experimental control

A

control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

behavior is best analyzed by measuring behavior ______ produced by imposed _______ on the environment

A

change, variations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Experimental Control

A

achieved when predictable change in behavior is produced by the systematic manipulation of the environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

achieved when predictable change in behavior is produced by the systematic manipulation of the environment

A

Experimental Control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

An analysis of behavior has been achieved when…

A

a reliable functional relation between the behavior and some aspect of the environment has been demonstrated convincingly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

internal validity

A

experimental control

the degree to which an experiment shows that changes in the dependent variable are a function of the independent variable and not the result of uncontrolled or unknown variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

experimental control

the degree to which an experiment shows that changes in the dependent variable are a function of the independent variable and not the result of uncontrolled or unknown variables

A

internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

confounding variable

A

uncontrolled variable known or suspected to exert an influence on the dependent variable

experimental control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

uncontrolled variable known or suspected to exert an influence on the dependent variable

experimental control

A

confounding variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

external validity

A

experimental control

the degree to which a study’s results are generalizable to other subjects/settings/behaviors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

experimental control

the degree to which a study’s results are generalizable to other subjects/settings/behaviors

A

external validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Experimental methods in ABA are guided by two defining features of behavior:

A
  1. behavior is an individual phenomenon

2. behavior is dynamic and continuous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Experimental methods in ABA are guided by two assumptions concerning its nature:

A
  1. behavior is determined (determinism is an assumption but ABA loves it)
  2. behavioral variability is extrinsic to the organism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

The components of ABA Experiments

A
research question
participant
behavior (dependent variable)
setting
measurement system and ongoing visual analysis
intervention (ind variable)
experimental design
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

research question

A

specifies what the investigator wants the experiment to answer

four types of questions:

  1. demonstration: change the behavior of interest?
  2. parametric: does more or less of the intervention work better?
  3. component: how effective is the intervention when various components are added or subtracted?
  4. comparative: does one intervention work better than another?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

specifies what the investigator wants the experiment to answer

A

research question

23
Q

participant

A

experiments in ABA are referred to as single-subject or single-case designs

  • does not mean all studies have one subject
  • denotes experimental logic that each participant as their own control
  • other terms include within-subject design, intrasubject design, and repeated-measures design
24
Q

behavior: dependent variable

A

the measurable dimensional quantity of the target behavior

-it is so labeled because the experiment is designed to determine whether the behavior is dependent on the independent variable

25
the measurable dimensional quantity of the target behavior
behavior: dependent variable
26
intervention or treatment: independent variable
behavior analysts seek functional relations between behavior change and environmental variables ind variable - sometimes called experimental variable, intervention, or treatment
27
behavior analysts seek functional relations between behavior change and environmental variables
intervention or treatment: independent variable
28
ind variable sometimes called
experimental variable, intervention, or treatment
29
experimental design
refers to the particular arrangement of conditions in a study so that meaningful comparisons of the effects of the presence, absence, or different values of the independent variable can be made can add, remove, increase, decrease, combine across behaviors, settings, or subjects (concerning ind variable) to see what happens
30
At a given point in time in a given setting, an experimenter can make only two basic kinds of independent variable changes:
introduce anew condition or reinstate an old condition
31
steady state responding
a pattern of responding that exhibits relatively little variation in its measured dimensional quantities over a period of time provides the basis for a powerful form of experimental reasoning called baseline logic
32
a pattern of responding that exhibits relatively little variation in its measured dimensional quantities over a period of time provides the basis for a powerful form of experimental reasoning called baseline logic
steady state responding
33
baseline logic
entails three elements (prediction, verification, and replication) each of which depends on an overall experimental approach called steady stat strategy
34
entails three elements (prediction, verification, and replication) each of which depends on an overall experimental approach called steady stat strategy
baseline logic
35
steady state strategy
entails exposing a subject to a given condition while trying to eliminate or control any extraneous influences on the behavior and obtaining a stable pattern of responding before introducing the next condition
36
entails exposing a subject to a given condition while trying to eliminate or control any extraneous influences on the behavior and obtaining a stable pattern of responding before introducing the next condition
steady state strategy
37
Baseline
data collected in the absence of the independent variable serves as a control condition does not necessarily mean the absence of instruction or treatment, only the absence of the independent variable
38
types of baseline data patterns
stable ascending descending variable
39
stable baseline
no evidence of upward or downward trend all measures fall within a small range of values
40
no evidence of upward or downward trend all measures fall within a small range of values
stable baseline
41
ascending baseline
an increasing trend in the behavior over time
42
an increasing trend in the behavior over time
ascending baseline
43
descending baseline
a decreasing trend in the behavior over time
44
a decreasing trend in the behavior over time
descending baseline
45
variable baseline
the data points do not fall within a narrow range of values, nor do they suggest any clear trend
46
the data points do not fall within a narrow range of values, nor do they suggest any clear trend
variable baseline
47
prediction (baseline)
the anticipated outcome of a presently unknown or future measurement throughout any experimental condition, predictions are made and confirmed until there is reason to believe that the response measure will not change appreciably under the present conditions
48
the anticipated outcome of a presently unknown or future measurement
prediction (baseline)
49
affirmation of the consequent
it is a true antecedent-consequence (if-A-then-B) statement such as... if A is true, then B is true. B is found to be true. Therefore, A is true.
50
it is a true antecedent-consequence (if-A-then-B) statement such as... if A is true, then B is true. B is found to be true. Therefore, A is true.
affirmation of the consequent
51
verification
increases the probability that a change in behavior was functionally related to the introduction of the independent variable by verifying the original prediction accomplished by showing the prior level of baseline responding would not have changed if the intervention was not implemented
52
increases the probability that a change in behavior was functionally related to the introduction of the independent variable by verifying the original prediction
verification
53
replication (fig 7.5 p 168)
repeating independent variable manipulations conducted previously in the study and obtaining similar outcomes two purposes: - reduces the probability that some factors other than independent variable is responsible for behavior change - demonstrates the reliability of the behavior change
54
repeating independent variable manipulations conducted previously in the study and obtaining similar outcomes
replication