week 7 Flashcards

(27 cards)

1
Q

importance of the individual subject in behavior analysis research

A

behavior analysis research methods feature direct and repeated measures of the behavior of individual organisms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

why use between-groups approach to experimental design to compare groups of subjects

A

the assumption that averaging the measures of many subjects’ performance controls for intersubject variability
- enables the belief that any changes in performance are broughth about by the independent variable

increasing the number of subjects increases the study’s external validity
- a treatmetn variable found effective with the subjets in the experimental group will also be effective with other subjects in the population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

average performance of a group of subjects reveal ______ about the performance of individual subjects

A

nothing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

group data mask variabiltiy

A

the mean performance of a grouop of subjects hides variability in the data

when repeated measurement reveals significant levels of variability, an experimental search of identifying and controlling the factors responsible for the variability is in order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

group data do not represent real _______ ______

A

behavioral processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

component analysis

A

any experiment designed to identify the active elements of a treatment package, the relative contributions of different components in a treatment package, and/or the necessity and sufficiency of treatment components

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

any experiment designed to identify the active elements of a treatment package, the relative contributions of different components in a treatment package, and/or the necessity and sufficiency of treatment components

A

component analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

two methods for conducting component analyses:

A

drop-out component analysis

  • the investigator presents the treatment package and then systematically removes components
  • if the treatment’s effectiveness wanes when a component is removed, the researcher has identified a necessary component

add-in component analysis assesses component individually or in combination before the complete treatment package is presented
- can identify sufficient components

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

internal validitiy

A

experiments that demonstrate a clear functional relation have a high degree of internal validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

an experimental design’s strength his determiend by the extent to which it

A

demonstrates a reliable effect

eliminates or reduces the likelihood that factors other than the independent variable produced the behavior change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

experimental control is often used to…

A

signify a researcher’s ability to reliably produce a specified behavior change by manipulating an independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

the level of experimental control obtained by a researcher refers to the extent to which she…

A

controls all relevant in a given experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

confounding variables

A

uncontrolled factors known or suspected to have exerted influence on the dependent variable are called confounding variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

uncontrolled factors known or suspected to have exerted influence on the dependent variable are called confounding variables

A

confounding variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

confounding variables can be viewed as related primarily to one of four elements of an experiment

A

subject
setting
measurement of the dependent variable
independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

subject confounds

A

maturation, subject’s behavior influenced by events outside the experiment, characteristics of one or more subjects may confound an experiment’s results (not an issue with single-case experiments)

17
Q

setting confounds

A

most aba studies are conducted in NATURAL SETTINGS

more prone to confounding by uncontrolled events that are studies conducted in laboratories where extraneous variables can be eliminated or held consistent

“bootleg” reinforcement: when, unbeknownst to the experimenter, subjects have access to the same items or events to be used as putative reinforcers in the study

18
Q

measurement confounds

A

numerous sources of confounding may exist within a well-planned measurement system

data might be confounded by:

  • observer drift
  • the influence of the experimenter’s behavior on observers
  • observer bias
19
Q

independent variable confounds

A

most independent variables are multifacted
- more to a treatmetn condition than the specific variable of interest

placebo control: separates effects that may be produced by a subject’s perceived expectations of improvement

when neither the subject(s) nor the observers know whetehr the independent variable is present or absent from session to session, this typs of contorl procedure is called a double-blind contorl

20
Q

treatment integrity

A

refers to the extent to which the independent variable is implemented as planned

low treatment integrity invites a major source of confounding into an experiment, making it difficult, if not impossible, to interpret the results with confidence

21
Q

______ ______ refers to the extent to which procedures in all conditions of an experiment, including baseline, are correctly implemented

A

procedural fidelity

22
Q

threats to treatment integrity

A

experimenter bias

treatment drift

23
Q

experimenter bias

A

influence the researcher to administer the independent variable in such a way that it enjoys an unfair advantage over baseline or comparative conditions

24
Q

treatment drift

A

the application of the independent variable differs from the way it was applied at the study’s outset

25
social validity
should be assessed in three ways - social significance of the behavior change goals - appropriateness of the intervention - social importance of the results
26
two major types of repliccaiton
direct | systematic
27
evaluating aba research external validity
generality of a behavior-environmente relation can be established only through the active process of systematic replication compare the study's resutls with those of other published studies sharing relevant features examine previous studies in teh lilterature and compare the results of these studies with those of the current experiment