72. MS neoplasia_Limbspare Flashcards
(35 cards)
the most common primary bone tumor in dogs
OSA 85% bone tumors in dogsappendicular vs axial
T/Fin Rottweilers, an inverse relationship has been documented with length of gonadal hormonal expression and the risk of developing OSA
TRUEearly OHE/neuter may actually increase risk OSA
the biological behavior of axial OSA in dogs is similar to appendicular OSA with the exception of OSA in what location
MANDIBLE OSA
difference btwn axial and appendicular OSA
BOTH act similarly (except mandibular OSA)axial die from local disease vs appendicular die from metastatic disease
where is the predilection of appendicular OSA
metaphyseal area of long bonesaway from elbowtoward the kneedistal radius and proximal humerus are the two most common sites
types of OSA
endosteal (most common–in medullary cavity)periosteal (invades into medullary cavity from outside)parosteal (does not invade underlying cortex)
bone biopsy
michelle trephine (larger, more diagnostic, risk fx, single)vs jamshidi (smaller, less risk fx, less diagnostic, multiple)RO sarcoma, other neoplasia, osteomyelitis–bacterial or fungal, bone cystcenter of radiographic abN recommended; caution biopsy tract and do NOT penetrate both corticesaccuracy 80-90%
diagnostic accuracy of FNA
FNA overall accuracy 71%up to 92% when a neoplastic lesion was Id’dcan use US guided 20 gauge FNA
mets and OSA
need fully screening (rads, bone scintigraphy, CT)rads nodule 7-9 mmCT <3 mmall patients have micro metastasisonly 15% will have macromets at time of diagnosis of appendicular OSAmost common location - other bones, lungs
Jankowski et al evaluated 399 dogs with OSA staged with scintigraphy, with what conclusions
8% had evidence of up take on scintigraphy that were highly suspicious of bone mets
MST for OSA with or without LN mets following amputation and chemotherapy
with LN mets 60 dayswithout LN mets 320 dayssignificantly shorter with LN mets
ALP in OSA prognosis
bALP increase in total ALP and b ALP has been documented indicator of POOR prognosis in dogs with OSAfailure of bALP to decrease post op was also associated with shorter survival and disease free interval
best candidate for appendicular OSA limb spare sx
distal radius OSArads/CT may underestimate marginMRI was more accurate with marginscintigraphy may overestimate margin variation within studies existed so no clear answer on best screening/staging imaging modality
VSSO retrospective study on OSA related pathologic fractures fixed with internal fixation concluded what
bone plating, ILN, ESFMST 166
fracture associated OSA
comminuted fracture >5 yrs prior with complicated healing, implant loosening, and or infectionmalignant transformation OSAtypically diaphyseal (not routine metaphyseal)associated with Jonas spring loaded IM pin (made of multiple types of metal and corrode easily)
partial, subtotal, total scapulectomy
partial= removal of proximal scapula with preservation of acromion, acromial head of deltoid, and distal infra/supraspinatussubtotal = removes most of scapula but preserves glenoid and glenohumeral jointtotal = removes entire scapula including glenoid
4 types of hemipelvectomies (differs from VSSO)
- total2. mid to caudal : preserves cranial ilium/SI3. mid to cranial: includes SI and acetabulum4. caudal: preserves limb and acetabulumaim for 2-3 cm
limb sparing techniques for distal radial OSA
- cortical allograft/cement/plate2. pasteurized autograft/plate3. intraoperative radiation (autograft)–no resection, not recommended 4. endoprosthesis** most common5. vascularized autograft ulnar transposition/plate (ulnar rollover)6. stereotatic radiosurgery–no resection7. bone transport osteogenesis (DO–intramem ossification)8. ITAP (partial amputation with endoprothestic)tumors should inovle < 50% radial length; obtain 3 cm margins
infection rate of cortical allograft limb spare
50% infection rateallograft does not incorporate into host bone during pets life therefor acts as a sequestrum and infection is a high risk complication of this procedure
compare allograft vs endoprosthesis for limb spare distal radius
no difff in infection rate, infection severity, surgical time, limb use, implant failure rate or oncologic outcomeendoprosthesis failed at proximal screwallograft failed at distal screwother biomechanics studies show that endoprosthesis is superior
three major complications of limb sparing surgery
- infection 40-75%2. recurrence 25%3. implant failure 40%OTHER4. impaired venous/lymphatic drainage—swelling
what positive finding is associated with infection and implant failure following limb sparing techniques
those patients with infection and implant failure had an INCREASED survival time
T/Fappendicular chrondrosarcoma is associated with a lower metastatic rate and longer survival time than appendicular OSA
TRUEBUT survival time of patients with chondrosarcoma was significantly associated with tumor grade (decreased survival time with increasing grade)
metastatic rate for cats with appendicular OSA
MUCH LOWER than dog appendicular OSAMST amputation alone = 17 -64 monthsMST amputation alone in dogs = 5 months