Chapter 63 - Autogenous grafts Flashcards
(46 cards)
First use of autogenous vein for occlusive arterial disease
1944 Dos Santos
Difference between vein and arterial wall
Endothelium - cuboidal with poor interendothelial tight junctions Internal elastic lamina - not well developed, large fenestrations Medial - type I collagen dominate; sparse elastin fragments only External elastic lamina - not well developped Adventitia - loose connection matrix with sparse vasa vasorum
New name for the saphenofemoral junction
Confluence of superficial inguinal veins
Proper names for the saphenous veins
Great saphenous Small saphenous
Where does the small saphenous join popliteal in relation to knee crease
5 cm proximal
Where does the femoral vein join the deep femoral in relation to inguinal ligament
9 cm below
Median cubital vein course
start at apex of antecubital fossa branch of cephalic ascends medially to join basilic vein
Origin of the axillary vein
brachial vein + basilic vein
Which never runs with basilic vein
Medial cutaneous nerve of the forearm paresthesia along medial portion of forearm
Probe frequency to use for vein mapping
> 8 MHz
Reference zones of the lower extremity
Zone 2-4 = proximal, middle distal thigh Zone 5-7 = proximal middle distal calf same with upper extremity
Minimal usable vein diameter
2-3 mm
Improved patency of the pedicle harvest technique
90% vs 76% after 8.5 years due to less touch or actually due to more NO from the surrounding adipose tissue
Irrigation for the harvested vein solution type
crystalloid. buffered chrystalloid or blood no clear difference but buffered solution suggested
Concentration of papaverine to be used
120 mg/L
Other vasodilators to use intraop for vein dilatation
Trinitrate 8.3 mg/L Verapamil 16.7 mg/L
Vein dilation maximum pressure
100-150 mmHg
Wound complication with skip incisions vs open filet
9.6 vs 28%
Factors that dictate saving the contralateral GSV for future revasc
1) Age < 70 2) DM 3) CAD 4) ABI < 0.7 if 3/4 then risk of needing it is 25-43% in 5 years
Project of ex-vivo vein graft engineering via transfection PREVENT III database on vein type and size
>3.5 GSV as reference 3.0-3.5 = 1.5x primary failure < 3.0 mm = 2.4x primary failure (63% secondary patency 1 year) composite vein = 1.5x failure arm vein = 1.6x failure
Valves in the reversed vein graft
1) lysis decreases 15% hydrodynamic resistance 2) lysis increases flow rate 15-30%
Reversed vein valves in long term how often stenosis and critical stenosis
10% > 50% stenosis 2.5% critical stenosis some demodynamic significant valves also regress with time
Nonreversed graft after lysis vs reversed grafts in flow rate
nonreversed with lysis 20% better flow rate more pronounced in smaller veins 2-2.5mm where leaflets can take up 45% of lumen
Valvulotome types
1) Mills 2) Lemaitre expandable 3) fixed uresil

