CHP 11 - WSD Flashcards

(46 cards)

1
Q

Subjects are assigned to more than one treatment condition.

A

Within-Subject Design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Power is an experiment’s ability to detect the independent variable’s effect on the dependent variable.

A

Statistical Concept of Power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

is an experiment’s ability to detect the independent variable’s effect on the dependent variable.

A

Power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Is desirable when it allows us to detect practically significant differences between the experimental conditions.

A

Statistical Power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Where excessive power detects meaningless differences between treatment conditions.

A

Point of diminishing returns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In a within-subjects experiment, researchers measure subjects on the dependent variable after each treatment.

A

Repeated-Measure Design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Subjects participate in more than one treatment condition and serve as their own control.

A

Within-Subjects Design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

We compare their performance on the dependent variable across conditions to determine whether there is a treatment effect.

A

Within subject Design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

assigns subjects to all levels of two or more independent variables.

A

Within-Subject Factorial Design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Is an experiment where there is at least one between subjects and one within-subjects variable.

A

Mixed Design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the advantages of within-subjects designs?

A

▪ use fewer subjects
▪ save time on training
▪ greater statistical power
▪controls extraneous subject variables
▪ more complete record of subjects’ performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the disadvantages of within-subjects designs?

A

▪ subjects participate longer
▪ resetting equipment may consume time
▪ treatment conditions may interfere with
each other
▪ treatment order may confound results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Two major counterbalancing strategies:

A

subject-by-subject counterbalancing

across-subjects counterbalancing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

when one treatment condition precludes another due to interference

A

Within Subject Design can’t be used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

are positive (practice) and negative (fatigue) performance changes due to a condition’s position in a series of treatments

A

Order effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

encompasses both positive and negative order effects.

A

Progressive Error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

a method of controlling order effects by distributing progressive error across different treatment conditions.

A

Counterbalancing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

which controls progressive error for each subject

A

subject-by-subject counterbalancing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

which distributes progressive error across all subjects

A

Across-subjects counterbalancing

20
Q

form of progressive error where performance declines on the DV due to tiredness, boredom, or irritation.

A

Fatigue effect

21
Q

A fatigue effect is form of_________________ where performance declines on the DV due to tiredness, boredom, or irritation

A

progressive error

22
Q

Subject performance on the dependent variable may improve across the conditions of a within-subjects experiment and these positive changes are called?

A

Practice effects

23
Q

may be due to relaxation, increased familiarity with the equipment or task, development of problem-solving strategies, or discovery of the purpose of the experiment.

A

Practice effect

24
Q

We can’t eliminate this because there is an order as soon as we present two or more treatments.

A

order effects

25
controls progressive error for each subject by presenting all treatment conditions more than once.
Subject by subject counterbalancing
26
Two subject-by-subject counterbalancing techniques:
Reverse counterbalancing Block randomization
27
we administer treatments twice in a mirror-image sequence, for example, ABBA.
Reverse counterbalancing
28
When this is linear, it progressively changes across the experiment so that A and B have the same amount of this
Progressive error
29
which can be curvilinear (inverted-U) or nonmonotonic (changes direction), cannot be graphed as a straight line.
Nonlinear progressive error
30
only controls for linear progressive error
Reverse counterbalancing
31
When progressive error increases in a straight line, this method actually?
Confounds the experiment
32
is a subject-by-subject counterbalancing technique where researchers assign each subject to several complete blocks of treatments.
Block randomization
33
consists of a random sequence of all treatments, so that each of this presents the treatments in a different order.
Block
34
presents each treatment several times, this can result in long-duration, expensive, or boring procedures. This problem is compounded as the experimenter increases the number of treatment
subject-by-subject counterbalancing
35
techniques present each treatment once and controls progressive error by distributing it across all subjects
Across-subjects counterbalancing
36
Two techniques:
Complete and partial counterbalancing
37
uses all possible treatment sequences an equal number of times. Researchers randomly assign each subject to one of these sequences.
Complete counterbalancing
38
is a form of across-subjects counterbalancing, where we present only some of the possible (N!) orders.
Partial counterbalancing
39
Two partial counterbalancing techniques are:
randomized partial counterbalancing Latin square counterbalancing
40
usually preferable when you need to control large individual differences or have a small number of subjects. However, it may not be feasible if the experiment is long or there is a risk of asymmetrical carryover.
Within-subject design
41
it may not be feasible if the experiment is long or there is a risk of?
asymmetrical carryover
42
These occur when the treatment condition affect each other.
Carryover Effects
43
can be controlled adequately by using within subjects design or complete counterbalancing
Carryover Effects
44
A mixed design contains at least one_______________ and one _______________ variable
Between-subject; within subject
45
Why can’t reverse counterbalancing control for nonlinear progressive error?
It assumes changes in performance are linear
46
A design approach used when complete counterbalancing is not feasible, involving only some of the possible sequen
Partial counterbalancing