CHUNG AND NAYA (2000)- ffectiveness of Electrically Measuring Adherence and compliance Flashcards

(11 cards)

1
Q

What was the aim of Chung and Naya (2000) study?

A

To investigate the effectiveness of electronically measuring medication adherence and compliance in asthma patients using a TrackCap.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How was adherence operationalised in this study?

A

(% of days in which both tablets were taken approx. 12 hours a part as instructed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How was compliance operationalised in the study?

A

% of days in which correct medication dosage/ amount is taken

the correct medication is taken but not exactly 12 hours a part as instructed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What medication were the ppts taking?

A

Zafirlukast (oral medication for asthma)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What method did Chung and Naya (2000) use?

A
  • Clinical trial- but in a naturalistic setting (patients took medication at home)
  • Longitudinal (12 week trial)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was the duration of the clinical trial?

A

12 weeks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a MEMS device?

A

A device that records the time and date of every time the medicine cap is removed and replaced (TrackCap was the brand used in the study).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How much ppts were in the sample?

A

57 asthma patients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Summarise the procedure?

A
  1. Medication distribution
  2. Supervision and physical asssessents
  3. Adherence rates assessed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the procedure of Chung and Naya (2000) study?

A
  1. Medication- ppts were given 3 weeks of Zafirlukast and were instructed to take 1 tablet in the morning and 1 in the evening (approx 12 hours a part). Patients were told their compliance was being measured, but they were not told how it would be measured.
  2. Supervision- ppts attended the clinic every 3 weeks for a physical assessment. They were instructed to return any unused tablets and have the bottle replaced for another 3 weeks supply.
  3. Measuring adherence- adherence was assessed based on 4 classifications
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What 4 classifications was used to measure adherence and compliance?

A
  • Insufficient interval adherence: Days in which medication was taken twice, with less than 8 hours between both times.
  • Undercompliance: Days in which medication was only taken once (one event)
  • No compliance: Days in which NO medication was taken.
  • Over-compliance: Days in which medication was taken more than the recommended 2 times.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly