Class 5,6 Flashcards
(43 cards)
Function x is disrupted by lesion to brain region Y, than Y supports function x (ex. fineas gage, HM, Broach (patient TAN))
Brain lesioning logic
Function x is disrupted by lesion to brain region Y, than Y supports function x
suggests a causal role of brain region Y in function X
(ex. fineas gage, HM, Broach (patient TAN))
Human vs non-human lesion studies

Limitations of Lesioning
Is the brain region critical for the task?
Disconnection syndrome
Disconnection syndrome
brain region X may not directly participate in function A, but may disconnect two brain regions that are critical for function A
Ex. Split brain patient - Severing the fibers of the corpus callosum leads to certain cognitive impairments BUT the corpus callosum does not carry out those
cognitive functions
Split-brain patients and saying what see (and why)
Most people have language centers in left
hemisphere
The visual system is contralaterally organized:
left field of vision is represented in right hemisphere
Shown in L hemisphere, r Hem process, but language in L (cannot say what see) but can pick up (motor control is on R side)
Logic/Issue of lesioning studies
Functions may be unrelated to brain region X itself, but related to keeping brain region X intact
Neuroplasticity, reorganizes and compensates for damage
Double Dissociation
determine if 2 factors are independent
ex. Brochas area - speach production NOT comp
Werinchek - imarirs speach comp but NOT production
Conduction aphasa
damage to arcutate fasciculus (white matter bundle of axions that connect brocha and wernicke;s area)
TMS
most common, figure 8 looking, area stimulating in middle
Use localized magnetic field pulses to alter electrical activity of neurons
- TMS coils can activate or deactivate regions of neurons depending on stimulation frequency
- Can be used to determine causal role of brain region

tDCS
Trancranial direct current stimulaiton
weak electral currnent between two patch electrodes
stimulation lower than TMS so can avoid adverse side effects
Can INC or DEC activity not compleet inhibit or stumulate
not as regonaly specific as TMS
Anodal (tDCS)
Inc activity
Cathodal (tDCS)
dec activity
tACS
A varation of tDCS that also involves an oscillating current
EEG
Measure voltage fluctuations from electrical activity of groups of neurons
NOT action potentals
electral activty through scalp
electroencephalogram
ERPs: brief changes in EEG time-locked to a stimulus event
Individual trials all have lots of background oscillation activity (noise), Take average of many trials to remove noise and get clean ERP signal
Betta Band
higher freq
Time-frequency analysis
amount of activity for a given frequency band
Pro EEG
- Excellent temporal resolution
- ERPs associated with cognitive processes
- Much more affordable than fMRI or MEG
Different frequency bands have been correlated with
different cognitive functions
Con EEG
- Poor spatial localization
- Not entirely solved with source modeling
- Poor access to deeper brain structures (e.g. MTL)
ECoG
Intracranial recording
• Electrode contact grids placed directly on the cortex
• Electrocorticography (ECoG)
- Cleaner signal than EEG, better spatial specificity
- However, invasive technique: recorded in epileptic patients who have grids implanted for medical purposes

MEG
Functional brain imaging
• Records magnetic fields generated by electrical currents using SQUIDs (Superconducting quantum interfering devices)
• Excellent temporal resolution, good spatial resolution
• Magnetic signals less distorted by skull
• Can also see ERP-type responses using MEG
• Event-related (magnetic) fields
• To best use spatial information of MEG, structural information needed
• MRI scan used to localize MEG
• Requires a special magnetically shielded room
• Magnetic fields being measured are very small
• Set-up can be quite expensive

In what ways are EEG and MEG similar?
- Both measure surface/scalp-level activity of groups of neurons
- Data can be analyzed similarly (e.g. with the event-related potential averaging method)
- Both have high temporal resolution for neural responses
what are some considerations for when you’d use EEG over MEG?
- EEG is more portable and not as sensitive to small disruptions in magnetic field, so you can take it for more ‘field studies’
- EEG is also way cheaper, so if you’re strapped for a budget and still want time sensitive data




