Conformity Flashcards

(35 cards)

1
Q

what are the 3 types of conformity

A
  • compliance
  • identification
  • internalisation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

explain what compliance is

A
  • when an individual agrees publicly but their private beliefs remain in disgareement
  • the individual changes their behaviour to be accepted by a group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

explain what identification is

A
  • private and public acceptance but is generally temporary
  • individuals adjust their behaviour because membership of that group is desirable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

explain what internalisation is

A
  • individual agrees publicly and privately
  • deepest type of conformity where and individual permantly changes thei r beliefs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the key study for research into conformity

A

asch

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

explain the procedure of aschs study

A
  • 123 male participants
  • the participants was in a group of 6 to 8 people and thought all people were like himself
  • there was only one real participant and the others were conferderates
  • participants asked to judge which of the three comparison lines was equal in length to the standard line
  • the confederates gave wrong answers on 12 out of the 18 trials
  • particpants was usually second to last to answer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what were the findings of aschs study

A
  • average conformity rate was 36.8%
  • 25% did not conform once
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the 3 situational variables that affect conformity

A
  • size of group
  • unanimity
  • task difficulty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what were the findings of aschs study when he varied the number of confederates

A
  • when there was one real particpant and one confederate, only 3% conformed
  • when the number of confederates increased to three, conformity rose to 32%
  • confderate level of 15 led to lower levels of conformity because participants became suspicious
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what were the findings of aschs study when he changed the unanimity of the confederates

A
  • asch disrupted the unanimity by including a dissenter (confederate who went against the majority view) and found conformity dropped from 36.8% to 5.5%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what were the findings of aschs study when he increases the task difficulty

A
  • aschs made the comparison lines more similar to eachother
  • this made participants more likely to conform
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are some weaknesses of aschs experiment

A
  • social desirability
  • ethical issues
  • artificial environment - lacks mundane realism
  • demand characteristics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are some strengths of aschs experiment

A
  • controlled
  • support from other studies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the two explanations for conformity

A
  • normative social influence
  • informational social influence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

explain what normative social influence is

A
  • based on the desire to be liked - an individual conforms because they have the need to be accepted
  • involves compliance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how was normative social influence shown in aschs study

A
  • some particpants later admitted that they knew the confederates answers were wrong but they didnt want to be the odd one out
17
Q

explain what informational social influence is

A
  • based on the desire to be right
  • this often occurs when an individual is unaare of hw to behave in a social situation so look to other for guidance
18
Q

explain research that supports the role of informational social influence

A

jennes

  • participants asked to make independant judgements about the number of beans contained in a jar
  • they then discussed their estimates in a group
  • participants then made a second estimate
  • it was found this second estimate moved closer to the group estimate
19
Q

what did asch change to his study to support normative social influence and what were the findings

A
  • he asked the participants to write their answers down
  • conformity dropped to 12.5%
  • this demonstrates they were conforming to win social approval
20
Q

what is the key study into research of social roles

21
Q

what is dispositional

A

they have sadistic personalities

22
Q

what is situational

A

the situation creates behaviour

23
Q

explain the procedure of zimbardos study

A
  • mock prison in stanford university
  • 21 male student volunteers randomly assigned role of guard or prisoner
  • prisoners spend 23 hours a day locked in their cells for two weeks
  • guards had a uniform with handcuffs, wooden club and mirror shades. The guards had complete power over the prisoners
24
Q

how were the social roles strictly divided in zimbardos study

A
  • prisoners were given 16 rules to follow
  • prisoners only referred to by number
  • guards had complete power
25
what were the findings of zimbardos study
* study was stopped after 6 days instead of the intended 14 because the guards behaviour became a threat to the prisoners health * guards, prisoners and researches all conformed to their social roles * prisoners rebelled within 2 days * one prisoner went on a hunger strike
26
explain a study that discredits zimbardos research
movahedi * argued participants were just play acting * behaviours were based on sterotypes suggesting the findings tell us little about conformity to social roles
27
explain a study that supports zimbardos research
mcdermott * argues the participants behaved as if the prison was real * 90% of the prisoners onversations were about prison life * this suggests the study did replicate social roles
28
what are some strengths of zimbardos study
* supporting research * practical applications - prison systems
29
what are some limitations of zimbados study
* ethical issues * demand characteristics * male sample * small sample * lack of realism
30
# strength give a PEELH for explanations of conformity | ISI
* P - supporting evidence for ISI * Eg - Jennes conducted a study where participants made indepednant guesses about the number of beans in a jar. they then discussed this with a group and made a second estimate. It was found the second estimate became closer to the group estimate * Ex - This shows that when people arent asure how to act in a social situation they lok to others for guidance, supporting the idea we conform to be right * L - therefore, thisa increases the validity for the explanation * H - artifical task had no real consequence so may lack ecological validity
31
# strength give a PEELH for explanations of conformity | NSI
* P - supporting evidence for NSI * Eg - asch asked some of the particiopants in his study why they conformed and some of them admitted it was because they didnt want to be the odd one out * Ex - this shows the desire to be liked and fit into a group made the indiviudal hide their real beliefs * L - therefore, this increases the validity for the NSI explanation * H - the use of an artifical task may lack ecological validity so the findings may not be able to be applied to a real life situation
32
# strength give a PEELH for aschs research
* P - lab experiment with controlled conditions * Eg - variab;es likle group size ad unanimity were carefully manipulated * Ex - allowed asch yo isolate the effects of these variables whihc improves the internal validity of the findings * L - the study provides stromg evidence for how specific social pressurs influence behaviour * H - because the study took part in the 1950s america, a place known for strong conformity norms, the findings may not reflect how people behave today. Decreasing temporal validity
33
# limitation give a PEELH for aschs research
* P - lacks ecological validity * Eg - the task of judging line lengths was trivial and had no real consequences * Ex - in real life, conformity usually happens in situations involving moral or social stakes * L - the study may underestimate or overestimate how people conform in real life settings * H - the simplicity of the task allowed researchers to focus purely on social pressure which was the aim of the study
34
# strength give a PEELH for zimbardos research
* P - supporting research * Eg - mcdermott re analysed partcipants conversations during the study and found that many believed the prison was real, with 90% of conversations involving prison life * Ex - this suggests particpants behaved as if the situation was real, rather than acting * L - this increases the validity of the research as the particpants displayed real confomrity to social roles * h - some behaviours may have been exaggerated due to demand characterisitics as participants knew it was an experiment
35
# limitation give a PEELH for zimbardos research
* P - challenged by other research * Eg - movahedit argued participants may have simply been acting in line with sterotypes of how guards and prisoners are expected to behave * Ex - this means participants werent truly conmforming to social roles but were performing based on what the researchers wanted * L - this challenges the internal validity of the study meaning the findings may tell us little about conformity to social roles in real life * H - the emotional reactions in the participants suggest at least some level of genuine psychological effect