Cultural Variations Flashcards
(12 cards)
what is meant by culture
the norms and values that exist within any group of people
what was the aim of van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s research
to look at the proportions of secure, insecure avoidant and insecure resistant attachments across countries
what was the procedure of van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s research
- meta analysis of 32 studies of attachment using the strange situation
- these were conducted in 8 countries
- 15 of the studies were in the USA
- 1,990 children
what were the findings of van IJzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s research
- secure attachment - 75% in britain, 50% china
- individualist cultures - rates of insecure resistant was under 14%
- collectivist cultures - rates were above 25%
who conducted the italian study
simonella et al
what was the procedure and the findings of the italian study
simonella et al
- assessed 76 babies using the strange situation
- 50% were secure
- 36% insecure avoidant
what do the reseachers suggest that is the cause of the findings in the italian study
increasing number of mothers of very young children worl long hours and use childcare
who conducted the korean study
jin et al
what was the procedure and the findings of the korean study
jin et al
- assessed 87 babies using the syrange situation
- proportions of insecure and secure babies were similiar to those in most countries
what do the cultural variations studies tell us
cultural practices have an influence on attachment type
strength
evaluate van Ijzendoorn
- P - large sample sizes
- Eg - the meta analysis included nearly 2000 infants across 32 studies in 8 different countries
- Ex - increases the internal validity by reducing the impact of anomalous results
- L - the conclusions drawn about attachment type are more likely to be reliable
- H - some countries were overrepresented (15 of the 32 were from the USA), which may bias the findings
limitation
evaluate van Ijzendoorn
- P - comparison in cultural variation studies may be based on countries not actual cultures
- Eg - compared attachment types across countries like USA and china but within each country there may be multiple subcultures
- Ex - thid means the variation within a coiuntry can be as significant as the variation between countries
- L - generalising findings from one area could be misleading
- H - Even so, their meta-analysis is still valuable because it revealed a clear global pattern: secure attachment was the most common style everywhere. Spotting that universal trend suggests a strong biological underpinning for attachment that cuts across cultural differences