dealing with OB Flashcards

aims and psych effects of custodial sentencing+recidivism, behaviour modification, anger management and restorative justice

1
Q

what is custodial sentencing

A

a decision make from court that punishment for crime should involve time being in custody/prison (incarceration) or in some other closed therapeutic+/educational institution (learn about B) eg a psych hospital

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the 4 purposes of custodial sentencing

A

deterrence, incapacitation, retribution, rehabilitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is deterrence (purpose of CS)

A

unpleasant prison exp > put off individuals from OB

2 levels

general: aims to send a BROAD MESSAGE to soc that crime will not be tolerated

individual: preventing individuals from repeating same offences in light of their exp

based on behaviourist ideas of conditioning- vicarious reinforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is incapacitation (purpose of CS)

A

taking offender out of society to prevent reoffending as a form of PROTECTION to the public, the need for this will depend on the severity of the offence/nature of offender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is retribution (purpose of CS)

A

where soc takes “revenge” for offence by making offender suffer, level of suffering should be proportional to seriousness of offence, any alts to prison seen by many as a soft alt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is rehabilitation (purpose of CS)

A

prison as a way for offender to be able to reform so when released they should be better adjusted within soc

opportunity to partake in training and develop skills or access to treatment programmes for eg addiction and anger and give them a chance to reflect on their offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the 3 psych effects of CS

A

stress and depression
institutionalisation
prisonisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is stress and depression as a psych effects of cs

A

there are high levels of suicide, self mutilation and self harm more than in the normal pop

incr likelihood of developing psych disorders following release

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is institutionalisation as a psych effect of cs

A

once adapted to norms and routines of prison E, inmates may not be able to adjust to the function in outside world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is prisonisation as a psych effect of cs

A

prisoners are socialised in adapting to “inmate code” B is considered unacceptable in soc but may be rewarded and encouraged within prison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is recidivism

A

reoffending, a tendency to relapse into a previous condition or mode of B

eg when a convicted offender repeatedly reoffends, a recidivist is one how has a persistent pattern of criminal reoffending

recidivism rates tell us to what extent prison acts an effective deterrent

approx 45% but difficult to measure
20% in norway which focuses on rehab and skills development

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what could reoffending be a result of …. (4 things)

A

age of offender (young may stop offending)
type of offence committed
time of release date (whats happening att)
country

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

limitation of cs: curt bartol prison E is brutal, demeaning and devastating, a record of…

A

119 people kts in prisons in england and wales in 2016, an increase in 29 people (32%) from 2015, 1 every 3 days, 9x higher than gen pop, most at risk are young single men during first 24hrs of confinement (>panic), a study by prison reform trust found that 25% of women and 15% of men in prison reported symptoms of psychosis.

although this data doesnt take into account inmates who experienced psychotic symptoms before being incarcerated. the importation model argues that prisoners may import some psych issues, therefore it is difficult to establish whether prisoners may import or trauma of exp prison > symp

therefore the oppressive prison regime may be detrimental to psych to psych health which could impact rehab, however there may be confounding variables that could influence the link between prison and psych effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

strength of CS: practical application eg rehab

A

provides opportunity enabling offenders to improve their character and lead a crime free life upon release.

often offenders have the opp to take part in education and training whilst in prison incr the possibility they will find employment upon release, it was found that offenders who take part in college education are 43% less likely to reoffend following release

therefore prison could be worthwhile for offenders if they are offered the opportunity to taking part in various forms of training and treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

limitation of CS: a risk of cs is offenders could learn to become … (school of crime)

A

learn to become better offenders, incarceration with lt offenders may provide younger inmates the opportunity to learn “tricks of the trade” from more experienced prisoners.

there is also the risk of criminal contacts being established that may be used upon release.

therefore this form of education could risk the increase of reoffending B rather than using prisons to offer rehab

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

s/l of SC: purpose of prison inc cp

A

onepoll found that 47% of responders saw the primary purpose of prison regimes as being “too soft” which does not deter existing or potential offenders

although 40% of respondents held the view that the main purpose of prisons is to reform and rehabilitate and prison should provide access to training and treatment so offenders can be effectively reintegrated back into soc

cp: one issue is overcrowding and lack of funding which decreased the opportunity for r+r and t+t to take place

therefore prison can be an opp for offenders to improve and reform their B using rehab however there is a lack of funding and too many offenders to cater for all to have this opp, resulting in the risk of prisoners not improving on their B

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what is behaviour modification

A

an app of the behaviourist approach to treatment (eg management of offender is penal institutions) (all B is learned therefore can unlearn)

inc principles of OC

general aim to replace undesirable B with more desirable ones through selective use of +/- reinforcement ie token econ (reinforce obedient b and punish disobedient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

apply token econ to Bmod

A

desirable B may inc avoiding confrontation, following prison rules, keeping cell clean

then offenders are given a token each time they perform a desirable B

do not apply or disobedient then token will be withheld or withdrawn as punishment

token are secondary reinforcers are get their value from association with reward/not direct, tokens can be exchanged for eg phone call with loved one, gym, cigarettes, food which are primary reinforcers as direct reward

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what are the 3 things needed when designing and using a token econ for bmod

A

operationalising target Bs
scoring system
training staff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

what is operationalising target Bs for token econ as bmod

A

break b down into components that needs to be objective, measureable and agreed with prison staff and inmates in advance.

eg desirable b is improved interaction with inmates so operationalised = speaking politely to others, not touching another prisoner as you pass them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what is a scoring system as a component of token econ for bmod

A

prisoners and staff need to be aware of how much each b is worth

Bs are hierarchical as some are more demanding than others eg get a greater reward so eg awards more token

could be points towards tokens or tokens directly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what is training staff for token econ for bmod

A

staff should be given full training to implement tokecon successfully, eg several hours for several weeks, aiming to standardise the procedures so that all staff are rewarding the same Bs in the same way.

staff should record when they reward tokens so the process of individuals can be assessed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

strength of bmod: research support from 2 studies, hobbs and holt and then field

A

hobbs and holt- introduced tokecon with groups of young offenders across 3 behavioural units and another for control

findings suggested a signif diff in positive B compared to non tokecon group

then field found with young offenders it was mainly successful however there were several young people who did not respond, they were then placed on a special programme where rewards became more immediate and frequent and the results became more successful.

therefore both studies support that tokecons are successful for bmod in custody

24
Q

limitation of bmod: number of prison staff, basset and blanchard found any …

A

benefits were lost if staff applied the techniques inconsistently. it was suggested this was because of a lack of relevant staff training and a high staff turnover

therefore bmod systems must ensure all staff are consistently engaging in the programme for such to work

25
strength of bmod: it is relatively easy to set up as there is no need for ...
specialist professionals unlike for eg anger management, wmt econ systems can be designed and implemented by anyone in any institution. they are also cost effective and easy to follow once workable methods of reinforcement are established therefore bmod techniques can be established in most prisons > accessed by most prisoners
26
limitation of bmod: it doesnt really affect lt B as there is "little ...
rehabilitative value" and any +changes in B may occur whilst in prison but may be quickly lost when released. eg cog based treatment eg anger management may be more likely to lead to permanent B change , focuses offender on understanding cause of offending and take responsibility, may go along with rewards but not actually permanently change B therefore 1 lim with te is that once offenders leave prison they may go back to their ob
27
s/l of bmod: ethics
s- can decrease conflict and allow for more successful management of prison pop > staff has less stress but can dehumanise offenders because scheme is compulsory, removal of tokens and "privileges eg exercise and contact with loved ones is unethical therefore evidence suggests bmod programmes can reduce prison staff stress but it can be seen as unethical for the offenders who have to oblige to the programme to receive rewards
28
what is anger management? a form of .... which involves ... focuses.... facilitates ...
a form of therapy which involves identifying the signs that trigger anger, alongside learning techniques to calm down and deal with the situation in a positive way. focuses on managing anger rather then preventing OB/B can be offered in prison to facilitate rehab and increase self awareness
29
how does AM link to cbt
cus its argued that cog factors trigger emotional arousal which often precedes aggressive acts. eg some individuals display anger in situations that are perceived as threatening. in cbt the individual is taught to recognise the cognitive factors that trigger their anger and loss of control and then encouraged to develop techniques which bring about CONFLICT RESOLUTION without requiring violence
30
what are the 3 stages of cbt for anger management
cognitive preparation skill acquisition application practice
31
what is cognitive preparation as a stage of cbt for anger management inc eg
offender reflects on past experiences and considers typical pattern of their anger, identify situations that act as triggers and if interpretation of event is irrational, therapist needs to make it clear. eg offender views someone looking at them as confrontational, redefine sitch as non threatening, therapist attempts to break what may be an automatic response
32
what is skill acquisition as a stage of cbt for anger management inc egs of cog, beh, phys
techniques and skills that help manage anger provoking situations in a more rational way cognitive: +self talk to increase calmness eg counting to 10 behavioural: training of how to communicate more effectively, which becomes an auto response when regularly practiced. physiological: deals with phys reaction to anger eg relaxation training or meditation, control emotions not be controlled by them
33
what is application practice as a stage of cbt for anger management
offenders attempt to use skills and practice them in a controlled E with therapist, eg re-enacting scenarios that may have once escalated anger/violence, offender has to be committed and see practice as real in order to be effective. therapist needs to be confident as they need to elicit anger in order to monitor progress. if successful then therapist provides positive reinforcement
34
eg of research into AM
keen
35
explained eg of research into AM- Keen investigated the effectiveness ...
of AM with offenders aged between 17 and 21. recommended course of 8 2hr sessions, the first 7 within 1 week with the rest 1 sessions a month later. found: its suggested an increased awareness of their anger management difficulties and an increased capacity to exercise self control
36
strength of AM: better compared to bmod
bmod aims to deal with surface B rather than the underlying causal processes. AM focuses on tackling the root cause of offending through acknowledging the cognitive processes that trigger anger > OB experience of AM could give cause of criminality and could then discover ways of managing their B once released from prison therefore AM is more likely to provide PERMANENT change of bmod
36
limitation of AM: blackburn argued that AM can have a noticeable effect st BUT ...
there is very little evidence that it reduces recidivism lt. one exp for this is that this form of therapy relies on role play during the app phase which may not represent all the triggers that could occur in a real-life setting therefore AM may be limited because it does not reduce reoffending
37
limitation of AM: howells looked at AM with australian offenders, findings suggested that there was an overall...
improvement in B when compared to controls with no treatment. those who had high levels of anger before the programme displayed the most improvement as well as offenders who were motivated to change their B therefore AM may be limited to certain individuals who have high levels of anger/motivation to change such B
38
limitation of AM: they are expensive to run because they require...
highly trained specialists who are used to dealing with violent offenders. consequently, several prisons may not be able to fund AMPs as well as offenders must be committed which would be unsuccessful if they are apathetic, it also takes a long time - many HOURS therefore AMP are limited because they are expensive to implement
39
s/l of AM: causal relationship
AM proposes a causal relationship between anger and offending due to producing an emotional state needing to conduct a crime cp: although loza and loza-fanous found NO DIFF in the levels of anger between violent and nonviolent offenders also said that offenders can use AM as a way of justifying behaviour therefore AM might not be a caus rel with offending when evidence suggests there is no difference between vio/non vio offender
40
what are restorative justice programmes? a system of dealing ...
dealing with OB which focuses on the rehab or offender through reconciliation with victims > enabling them to see the impact of their crimes and serves to empower survivor by giving them a voice (ask Qs about why they acted a certain way)
41
what 2 things does RJPs focus on and what does it NOT focus on
the survivor/victim and the offender focuses on reparation (repairing harm causes) NOT retribution (punishing the offender)
42
when might RJP take place
before the trial and so acknowledgement of participation may be considered in sentencing > reduced/ may happen during incarceration > reduced sentence
43
in RJPs how may it benefit victim/what can offender do as part of restitution
offender may provide financial restitution to victim which may reflect the psych damage or physical damaged caused eg ay repair broken window or damaged property, or may replace stolen goods
44
what positive impact can RJPs have on the victims emotions
support their healing process by repairing their confidence, self esteem eg if burgled they may fear someone breaking into their house again
45
what is the rwa of RJPs/what does the restorative justice council say it can be implemented in
schools, work places, hospitals, communities, childrens services, prevention and management of conflict
46
strength of RJPs: positive impact on survivors, the RJ council reported the results of a 7yr research project. %%% of survivors ...
85% reported satisfaction when meeting offender face to face 78% recommended the exp to people in a similar situation 60% felt better about the situation as it provided an opportunity to move forward 2% felt worse therefore RJPs can be beneficial for the survivors involved in helping them to manage and cope after the incident
47
lim of RJPs: cp to research support from RJ council: wood and suzuki suggested despite satisfaction surveys the RJPs are not...
not survivor focused. in fact the survivors are used to help the rehab of offenders rather than themselves therefore it may argued that restorative processes are focused on rehabing offenders rather than focusing on the needs of the survivors involved
48
strength of RJPs: meta analysis by strang compared offenders who had RJ with
compared to offenders who just had custodial sentencing. findings suggest that those within RJ group were significantly less likely to reoffend, this was larger for violent crimes rather than against property bain found lowered reoffending rates with adult with 1to1 contact rather than community involvement therefore RJPs can be supported because it provides a positive impact on receidivism dependent on the type of offence and approaches used
49
lim of RJPs Gijseghem argued that offenders may use RJ for all kinds of reasons such as to ...
avoid punishment ie take pride in their relationship with the survivor and or play down their faults therefore the evidence suggests that some offenders may abuse the system when engaging in restorative processes and are then at risk of reoffending
50
50
s/l of RJPs it can be useful
the national police chiefs council does not support the use of RJ within odmestic violence liebman argues that is because of the power imbalance between the abuser and the abused puts pressure of the survivors who may feel they have to go along with their partner/ex during mediation, the reason being because they fear the worst could happen otherwise, when released they offend again despite this it is suggested that pre trial mediation in domestic violence cases produces positive results for the survivors, it is useful with intimate partner violence (the couple are still together) because they can address the harm caused and avoid the reoccurrence in the future
51
what are some benefits to the victim of RJPs
they can put the crime behind them, acts as closure, empowerment in the sense of personal power, develop understanding of why the crime was committed, gives greater voice in the criminal justice system
52
what are some benefits to the offender of RJPs
opportunity to address and heal underlying issues and opp to change, develop understanding of the effect of their actions, opp to apologise and accept responsibility, opp to repair harm done as a result of their crime
53
what are some benefits to the wider community and econ of RJPs
reduces frequency of reoffending so community is safer, saves money, opp to rebuild sense of community and mutual accountability, shows community that offenders are making up for their actions so gives a sense of retribution
54